The Relationship Between Friction and Film Thickness in EHD Point Contacts in the Presence of Longitudinal Roughness

This study investigates friction and film thickness in elastohydrodynamic contacts of machined, rough surfaces, where roughness is dominated by longitudinal ridges parallel to the rolling/sliding direction. A ball-on-disc tribometer was used to simultaneously measure friction and film thickness in rough contacts as well as with nominally smooth specimens for comparison. The studied rough surfaces were selected so that the influence of the root-mean-square roughness and roughness wavelength can be assessed. Friction and film measurements were taken over a range of slide–roll ratios and speeds and with two lubricating oils with different viscosities, hence covering a wide range of specific film thicknesses. The measurements with the nominally smooth specimens show that friction is strongly influenced by thermal effects at high SRRs and that the transition from mixed/boundary to full EHD lubrication occurs at lambda ratios greater than three. At low speeds, the rough specimens are found to generate higher friction than the smooth ones for all the roughness structures considered, and this is shown to be related to the thinner minimum film thickness. Comparison of friction in rough and smooth contacts shows that the total friction in rough contacts can be divided into two components: one that is equivalent to friction in smooth contacts under the same conditions and is dependent on the slide–roll ratio, and the other that is due to the presence of roughness and is independent of the slide–roll ratio under the conditions tested. Further analysis of the minimum film thickness on tops of roughness ridges indicates that even after the full lift-off, an effect of the roughness on friction persists and is most likely related to the local shear stress in the micro-EHD contacts on the top of roughness ridges. At even higher speeds, the difference in friction between the rough and smooth specimens vanishes.

[1]  J. F. Archard,et al.  The temperature of rubbing surfaces , 1959 .

[2]  K. Johnson,et al.  First Paper: Sliding Friction between Lubricated Rollers: , 1967 .

[3]  E. G. Trachman,et al.  Traction in elastohydrodynamic line contacts for two synthesized hydrocarbon fluids , 1974 .

[4]  A. Jackson,et al.  An Interferometric Study of the EHL of Rough Surfaces , 1976 .

[5]  J. A. Greenwood,et al.  Thermal analysis of an Eyring fluid in elastohydrodynamic traction , 1980 .

[6]  Ward O. Winer,et al.  Regimes of Traction in Concentrated Contact Lubrication , 1982 .

[7]  W W Clements,et al.  The Influence of Diffuser Channel Geometry on the Flow Range and Efficiency of a Centrifugal Compressor , 1987 .

[8]  K. Johnson,et al.  The Influence of Surface Roughness on Elastohydrodynamic Traction , 1987 .

[9]  R. Bosma,et al.  The Influence of Longitudinal and Transverse Roughness on the Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication of Circular Contacts , 1988 .

[10]  K. Johnson,et al.  Determination of gear tooth friction by disc machine , 1991 .

[11]  Hugh Spikes,et al.  Prediction of traction in elastohydrodynamic lubrication , 1998 .

[12]  Henry Peredur Evans,et al.  Effect of Surface Finish on Gear Tooth Friction , 2000 .

[13]  Hugh Spikes,et al.  The development and application of the spacer layer imaging method for measuring lubricant film thickness , 2001 .

[14]  H. A. Spikes,et al.  The Elastohydrodynamic Traction of Synthetic Base Oil Blends , 2001 .

[15]  Influence of longitudinal roughness on friction in EHL contacts , 2004 .

[16]  M. Kano,et al.  The effect of surface texture on traction performance in a traction drive , 2003 .

[17]  Michael M. Khonsari,et al.  The Stribeck Curve: Experimental Results and Theoretical Prediction , 2006 .

[18]  Hugh Spikes,et al.  The Influence of Longitudinal Roughness in Thin-Film, Mixed Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication , 2006 .

[19]  Kenshi Ushijima,et al.  Increase of Traction Coefficient due to Surface Microtexture , 2008 .

[20]  Hugh Spikes,et al.  History, Origins and Prediction of Elastohydrodynamic Friction , 2014, Tribology Letters.

[21]  Wang-Long Li,et al.  Grip Performance Affected by Water-Induced Wrinkling of Fingers , 2015, Tribology Letters.

[22]  H. Spikes,et al.  A Study of the Lubrication of EHL Point Contact in the Presence of Longitudinal Roughness , 2015, Tribology Letters.

[23]  Hugh Spikes,et al.  Reply to the Comment by Scott Bair, Philippe Vergne, Punit Kumar, Gerhard Poll, Ivan Krupka, Martin Hartl, Wassim Habchi, Roland Larson on “History, Origins and Prediction of Elastohydrodynamic Friction” by Spikes and Jie in Tribology Letters , 2015, Tribology Letters.