Who's Afraid of the Virtual World? Anxiety and Computer-Mediated Communication

This study integrates the literature on computer anxiety and communication apprehension to determine their joint impact upon individual attitudes toward using and use of computer mediated communication (CMC). We introduce the application-specific CMC anxiety, defined as an individual’s level of fear or apprehension associated with actual or anticipated use of information technology to communicate with others. Furthermore, we advance a new nomological structure that positions CMC anxiety as a proximal mediating construct between the more general constructs of computer anxiety, communication apprehension, and CMC familiarity, and the dependent constructs of CMC attitudes and use. We develop and empirically test this nomological structure, finding that computer anxiety, oral communication apprehension, and CMC familiarity contribute to CMC anxiety, while written communication apprehension does not. CMC anxiety fully mediates the relationship between the general constructs and attitude toward using CMC. CMC anxiety explains 34% of the variance in attitudes, while attitudes, coupled with familiarity, explain 14% of the variance in CMC use.

[1]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[2]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[3]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations , 1997 .

[5]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The etiology of computerphobia , 1990 .

[6]  J. Todman,et al.  Qualitative differences in computer experience, computer anxiety, and students' use of computers: A path model , 1994 .

[7]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Myths and realities of computerphobia: A meta-analysis , 1990 .

[8]  Charles D. Spielberger,et al.  Chapter 14 – CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN ANXIETY RESEARCH , 1972 .

[9]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy - An Empirical Assessment , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[11]  Gary Hackbarth,et al.  Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: mediating influences of self-deception and self-efficacy. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View , 1995, MIS Q..

[16]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[17]  Matthew M. Maurer,et al.  Computer anxiety correlates and what they tell us: A literature review , 1994 .

[18]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[21]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[22]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[23]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Michael D. Scott,et al.  Measuring Communication Apprehension. , 1978 .

[25]  Jacob E. Hautaluoma,et al.  Anxiety management training as a strategy for enhancing computer user performance , 1990 .

[26]  R. Sitgreaves Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[27]  Marcus Childress,et al.  Explaining and Predicting Resistance to Computer Anxiety Reduction among Teacher Education Students , 2002 .

[28]  Karen Kangas Dwyer,et al.  Communication Apprehension and Learning Style Preference: Correlations and Implications for Teaching. , 1998 .

[29]  Mark Srite,et al.  Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS , 2002, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  M. Feldman,et al.  Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying Hi Really Matter? , 1998 .

[33]  M. Brosnan Modeling technophobia: a case for word processing , 1999 .

[34]  Virginia P. Richmond,et al.  Communication: Apprehension, Avoidance, and Effectiveness , 1985 .

[35]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[36]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[37]  Juline E. Mills,et al.  Cyberslacking! , 2001 .

[38]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[39]  R. Carlson,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Communication Apprehension: Relationship and Introductory College Course Effects , 1993 .

[40]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[42]  M. Patterson,et al.  Social and Communicative Anxiety: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[44]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[45]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Patterns of Social Interaction and Learning to Write , 1991 .

[46]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  A comparison of leading theories for the prediction of goal‐directed behaviours , 1995 .

[47]  John A. Daly,et al.  Occupational Desirability and Choice as a Function of Communication Apprehension , 1975 .

[48]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[49]  Dianne H. Jordan,et al.  Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: technologies, tools and techniques , 2000 .

[50]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  The Effects of Information System User Expectations on Their Performance and Perceptions , 1993, MIS Q..

[51]  Robert D. Smith,et al.  Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? , 1986, CACM.

[52]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[53]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model* , 1991 .

[55]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[56]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[57]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[58]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy , 2002, MIS Q..

[59]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[60]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Computer Anxiety and Computer Attitudes: An Investigation of Construct and Predictive Validity Issues , 1990 .

[61]  Michael D. Miller,et al.  The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writing Apprehension. , 1975 .

[62]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[63]  M. Markus Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[64]  Steven C. Rhodes,et al.  Writing Apprehension and Writing Intensity in Business and Industry , 1988 .

[65]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[66]  Mike Allen,et al.  The relationship of communication apprehension to communication behavior: A meta‐analysis , 1996 .

[67]  R. Kanfer Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[68]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[69]  Rajesh V. Manchanda,et al.  The Impact of Compute Anxiety On The Evaluation of Prices On The Internet , 2002 .

[70]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[71]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  The Effects of Sex, Age, and Computer Experience on Computer Attitudes. , 1984 .

[72]  Steven C. Rockwell,et al.  The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies , 1997 .

[73]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[74]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety and Attitudes toward Microcomputers , 1989 .

[75]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[76]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[77]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences , 2003 .

[78]  T. E. Dinero Scale development. , 1996, Journal of health & social policy.

[79]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[80]  Richard S. Lazarus,et al.  EMOTION AND COGNITION: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ANXIETY , 1972 .

[81]  James T. Brown,et al.  Attitudes Toward Computers , 1991 .

[82]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[83]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[84]  John A. Daly,et al.  Writing apprehension and occupational choice , 1976 .

[85]  A. Buss,et al.  Shyness and sociability. , 1981 .

[86]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[87]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[88]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The Relationship Between Communication Apprehension and Academic Achievement Among College Students. , 1976 .

[89]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[90]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Chapter 11 – EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO TEST ANXIETY: ATTENTION AND THE USES OF INFORMATION , 1972 .

[91]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[92]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[93]  Barbara A. Gutek,et al.  Attitudes toward computers: when do they predict computer use? , 1992, Inf. Manag..

[94]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[95]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Computer anxiety and attitudes towards microcomputer use , 1990 .

[96]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[97]  Ritu Agarwal Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies , 2000 .

[98]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[99]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[100]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Social anxiety and self-presentation: a conceptualization and model. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[101]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[102]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  Chapter 8 – THE NATURE OF ANXIETY WITH EMPHASIS UPON ITS RELATIONSHIP TO EXPECTANCY1 , 1972 .

[103]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  The Computerphobia Reduction Program: Year 1. Program development and preliminary results , 1987 .

[104]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. , 1994 .

[105]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[106]  B. Wellman,et al.  Social Impacts of Electronic Mail in Organizations: A Review of the Research Literature , 1995 .

[107]  Charles D. Spielberger,et al.  Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research , 1972 .

[108]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[109]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Treating technophobia: A longitudinal evaluation of the computerphobia reduction program , 1993 .