Relationship between indentation size effect and material properties in the microhardness measurement of some cobalt-based alloys

Abstract The load dependence of the Vickers microhardness of some cobalt-based alloys subjected to heat treatment at different temperatures for various durations, investigated using Hanemann’s method and a PMT-3 hardness tester, has been discussed. The experimental results show that: (1) the indentation size effect is best revealed by the proportional specimen resistance model of Li and Bradt, and (2) the plot of the ratio of indentation load P to indentation diagonal d against d for a sample exhibits two different slopes b with a transition in the slopes occurring at an indentation diagonal d lying between 9 and 20 μm. Analysis of the results revealed that: (1) the origin of indentation size effect is associated with the processes of relaxation of indentation stresses, (2) the load-dependent quantity a and load-independent quantity b for cobalt-based alloys are intimately connected with the grain size and defect structure of the alloys, and the grain-size dependence of their microhardness qualitatively agrees with the modified Hall–Petch relation, (3) in the range of high indentation loads the microhardness of cobalt-based alloys, as determined by using the proportional specimen resistance model, is practically independent of the applied load, and (4) the origin of a critical indentation diagonal d c * ≈15 μm, when a change in the slope of the plot of a against b occurs, is associated with the value of indentation diagonal d when frictional resistance begins to contribute to the values of a .

[1]  A. Razdan,et al.  Load and directional effects on microhardness and estimation of toughness and brittleness for flux-grown LaBO3 crystals , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[2]  R. Bradt,et al.  Knoop microhardness of single crystal sulphur , 1994, Journal of Materials Science.

[3]  J. H. Westbrook,et al.  The Science of hardness testing and its research applications : based on papers presented at a symposium of the American Society for Metals, October 18 to 20, 1971 , 1973 .

[4]  G. F. Vander Voort,et al.  Microindentation hardness testing , 1998 .

[5]  Wolfgang Grellmann,et al.  Performance and analysis of recording microhardness tests , 1977 .

[6]  D. Tabor Hardness of Metals , 1937, Nature.

[7]  D. Clarke,et al.  Size dependent hardness of silver single crystals , 1995 .

[8]  E. G. Kendall,et al.  An analysis of Knoop microhardness , 1973 .

[9]  R. Bradt,et al.  The microhardness indentation load/size effect in rutile and cassiterite single crystals , 1993, Journal of Materials Science.

[10]  H. Miao,et al.  Load-dependence of Knoop hardness of Al2O3-TiC composites , 2000 .

[11]  T. Page,et al.  The deformation behavior of ceramic crystals subjected to very low load (nano)indentations , 1992 .

[12]  T. Page,et al.  An explanation of the indentation size effect in ceramics , 1989 .

[13]  Jianghong Gong,et al.  Examination of the indentation size effect in low-load vickers hardness testing of ceramics , 1999 .

[14]  J. Gong,et al.  An energy-balance analysis for the size effect in low-load hardness testing , 2000 .

[15]  L. Trusov,et al.  Size effects in micromechanics of nanocrystals , 1993 .