Persistence of activity in threshold contact processes, an “Annealed approximation” of random Boolean networks

We consider a model for gene regulatory networks that is a modification of Kauffmann's (1969) random Boolean networks. There are three parameters: $n =$ the number of nodes, $r =$ the number of inputs to each node, and $p =$ the expected fraction of 1's in the Boolean functions at each node. Following a standard practice in the physics literature, we use a threshold contact process on a random graph on $n$ nodes, in which each node has in degree $r$, to approximate its dynamics. We show that if $r\ge 3$ and $r \cdot 2p(1-p)>1$, then the threshold contact process persists for a long time, which correspond to chaotic behavior of the Boolean network. Unfortunately, we are only able to prove the persistence time is $\ge \exp(cn^{b(p)})$ with $b(p)>0$ when $r\cdot 2p(1-p)> 1$, and $b(p)=1$ when $(r-1)\cdot 2p(1-p)>1$.

[1]  Ilya Shmulevich,et al.  Eukaryotic cells are dynamically ordered or critical but not chaotic. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Random Boolean network models and the yeast transcriptional network , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[4]  K. Athreya,et al.  Large Deviation Rates for Branching Processes--I. Single Type Case , 1994 .

[5]  Henrik Flyvbjerg,et al.  Exact solution of Kauffman's model with connectivity one , 1988 .

[6]  L. Hood,et al.  Gene expression dynamics in the macrophage exhibit criticality , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  L. Kadanoff,et al.  Boolean Dynamics with Random Couplings , 2002, nlin/0204062.

[8]  R. Durrett Random Graph Dynamics: References , 2006 .

[9]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Q. Ouyang,et al.  The yeast cell-cycle network is robustly designed. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Madalena Chaves,et al.  Robustness and fragility of Boolean models for genetic regulatory networks. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  J. Berestycki,et al.  Large deviations for Branching Processes in Random Environment , 2008, 0810.4991.

[13]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Contact Process on a Finite Set. II , 1988 .

[15]  B. Derrida,et al.  Random networks of automata: a simple annealed approximation , 1986 .

[16]  T. Liggett,et al.  Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes , 1999 .

[17]  T. Mountford A Metastable Result for the Finite Multidimensional Contact Process , 1993, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin.