Exposed! CS Faculty Caught Lecturing in Public: A Survey of Instructional Practices

Many research studies show students benefit from instructional practices that promote student interaction within the classroom. However, recent prominent reports suggest many instructors still rely on lecture as their dominant classroom activity. This paper reports on a survey of U.S. computer science teaching practices. Responses indicate many CS instructors use student-centered instructional practices but evidence suggests students would benefit from additional use of these practices. Twenty percent of CS instructors report "student-centered activities" are prominent in their classroom. CS instructors are more likely to use student-centered practices than those in other science disciplines but less likely to do so than colleagues in non-science fields. Female CS instructors are more likely to structure their courses around student-centered practices than their male colleagues.

[1]  Sue Fitzgerald,et al.  Pair programming in education: a literature review , 2011, Comput. Sci. Educ..

[2]  References , 1971 .

[3]  C. Manduca,et al.  Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of U.S. Faculty , 2005 .

[4]  Mary Jo White,et al.  Caffeine, Cajoling, and Other Strategies to Maximize Clinician Survey Response Rates , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[5]  D. Linton,et al.  Where ' s the evidence that active learning works ? , 2006 .

[6]  Leland L. Beck,et al.  Cooperative learning instructional methods for CS1: Design, implementation, and evaluation , 2013, TOCE.

[7]  Susanne E. Hambrusch,et al.  Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science , 2009, SIGCSE '09.

[8]  Emily M. Walter,et al.  Introducing the Postsecondary Instructional Practices Survey (PIPS): A Concise, Interdisciplinary, and Easy-to-Score Survey , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  C. Henderson,et al.  Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature , 2011 .

[10]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States , 2009 .

[11]  Nancy Kober,et al.  Reaching Students: What Research Says about Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2015 .

[12]  Susan R. Singer,et al.  Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2012 .

[13]  Clifton Kussmaul,et al.  Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) for computer science , 2012, SIGCSE '12.

[14]  Catherine H. Crouch,et al.  Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom , 2006 .

[15]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[16]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments , 2010 .

[17]  M. Waldrop,et al.  Why we are teaching science wrong, and how to make it right , 2015, Nature.

[18]  Robert McCartney,et al.  A Multi-institutional Study of Peer Instruction in Introductory Computing , 2016, SIGCSE.

[19]  David C. Haak,et al.  Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology , 2011, Science.

[20]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Jessica Watkins,et al.  Retaining Students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors , 2013 .

[22]  Scott Grissom Introduction to special issue on alternatives to lecture in the computer science classroom , 2013, TOCE.

[23]  J. Michael Where's the evidence that active learning works? , 2006, Advances in physiology education.