Control and Autonomy—The SAIs in Norway, Denmark, and Germany as Watchdogs in an NPM-Era?

New public management (NPM) reforms have weakened the direct steering capacity within state bureaucracy. This article looks into how supreme audit institutions in three countries (Norway, Denmark, and Germany) assess these types of reforms. The analysis shows that all three SAIs have taken on an evaluative role when judging NPM instruments. At the same time their emphasis on legality and compliance can be at odds with some of the operating principles in NPM. All in all the German SAI seems to be the most radical critic. This may be linked to the lack of openness of the German SAIs results that makes it more internally focused within a mindset of administrative accountability.

[1]  K. Reichborn-Kjennerud.  Performance audit and the importance of the public debate , 2014 .

[2]  F. Sowa,et al.  Accounting in der Arbeitsverwaltung: Vermittlungsfachkräfte zwischen Steuerungsimperativen und autonomem Vermittlungshandeln , 2014 .

[3]  Tom Willems,et al.  DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY IN PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: THE CURIOUS CASE OF FLEMISH SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE , 2014 .

[4]  R. Goodin,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability , 2014 .

[5]  Amanda M. Girth.  A Closer Look at Contract Accountability: Exploring the Determinants of Sanctions for Unsatisfactory Contract Performance , 2014 .

[6]  R. Craig,et al.  Perverse Audit Culture and Accountability of the Modern Public University , 2014 .

[7]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Why Reforms So Often Disappoint , 2014 .

[8]  W. Jann,et al.  Mapping accountability changes in labour market administrations: from concentrated to shared accountability? , 2013 .

[9]  Kristin Reichborn‐ Kjennerud.  POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE AUDIT: THE CASE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL IN NORWAY , 2013 .

[10]  C. Hood.  Public Management by Numbers as a Performance‐Enhancing Drug: Two Hypotheses , 2012 .

[11]  Louise Bringselius.  The Dissemination of Results from Supreme Audit Institutions: Independent Partners with the Media? , 2012 .

[12]  Arnfrid Arthur,et al.  The User Perspective in Performance Auditing—A Case Study of Norway , 2012 .

[13]  L. H. Pedersen,et al.  ONE-STOP SHOPS FOR SOCIAL WELFARE: THE ADAPTATION OF AN ORGANIZATIONAL FORM IN THREE COUNTRIES , 2011 .

[14]  W. Funnell.  Keeping secrets? Or what government performance auditors might not need to know , 2011 .

[15]  Peter Wilkins,et al.  Performance Auditing: Contributing to Accountability in Democratic Government , 2011 .

[16]  Livingston Armytage,et al.  Evaluating aid: An adolescent domain of practice , 2011 .

[17]  J. Boston.  Basic NPM Ideas and their Development , 2010 .

[18]  S. Goldfinch,et al.  TWO MYTHS OF CONVERGENCE IN PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REFORM , 2010 .

[19]  Peter Skærbæk.  Public sector auditor identities in making efficiency auditable: The National Audit Office of Denmark as independent auditor and modernizer , 2009 .

[20]  Lars Holtkamp,et al.  Das Scheitern des Neuen Steuerungsmodells , 2008, dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management.

[21]  F. Larsen,et al.  Quasi-Markets in Employment Policy: Do They Deliver on Promises? , 2008, Social Policy and Society.

[22]  Vando Borghi,et al.  New modes of governance in activation policies , 2007 .

[23]  M. Bovens.  Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework , 2007 .

[24]  L. English.  Performance Audit of Australian Public Private Partnerships: Legitimising Government Policies or Providing Independent Oversight? , 2007 .

[25]  Paul G. Roness,et al.  Performance Management in Practice: the Norwegian Way , 2006 .

[26]  R. Mulgan.  Government Accountability For Outsourced Services , 2006 .

[27]  A. Kemmerling,et al.  ‘New politics’ in German labour market policy? The implications of the recent Hartz reforms for the German welfare state , 2006 .

[28]  C. Hood,et al.  The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? , 2004 .

[29]  C. Pollitt.  Public Management Reform: Reliable Knowledge and International Experience , 2003 .

[30]  J. Keen.  New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice , 2003 .

[31]  Danielle Morin.  Controllers or catalysts for change and improvement: would the real value for money auditors please stand up? , 2003 .

[32]  Richard T. Green.  Common Law, Equity, and American Public Administration , 2002 .

[33]  Ralph Hambrick,et al.  Rethinking Democratic Accountability , 2002 .

[34]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  CLARIFYING CONVERGENCE. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform , 2001 .

[35]  Yves Gendron,et al.  In the name of accountability ‐State auditing, independence and new public management , 2001 .

[36]  G. Vinten.  Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[37]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Performance or Compliance , 1999 .

[38]  Frans L. Leeuw,et al.  Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and answers , 1996 .

[39]  J. Grand.  Quasi-markets and social policy , 1991 .

[40]  C. Hood.  A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[41]  D. Reinharth.  The quality of care: how can it be assessed? , 1989, JAMA.

[42]  H. R. Balls.  The watchdog of Parliament: the centenary of the legislative audit , 1978 .

[43]  Kenneth F. Warren.  Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or Why It's Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All . By Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron B. Wildavsky. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973. Pp. xviii, 182. $7.50.) , 1974 .

[44]  H. Wollmann,et al.  Verwaltung und Verwaltungsreformen in Europa : Einführung in die vergleichende Verwaltungswissenschaft , 2013 .

[45]  H. Wollmann,et al.  Verwaltung und Verwaltungsreformen in Europa , 2013 .

[46]  R. Berkel,et al.  The governance of active welfare states in Europe , 2011 .

[47]  J. Boston,et al.  Joint or Shared Accountability: Issues and Options , 2011 .

[48]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Increased Complexity in Public Organizations — the Challenges of Combining NPM and Post-NPM , 2010 .

[49]  Per Lægreid,et al.  Governance of Public Sector Organizations , 2010 .

[50]  D. Cooper,et al.  The construction of auditing expertise in measuring government performance , 2007 .

[51]  Oliver Bruttel.  Privatisierung der öffentlichen Arbeitsvermittlung? Ein Alternativvorschlag zur gegenwärtigen Reformstrategie , 2005 .

[52]  Jane Broadbent,et al.  Control and Legitimation in Government Accountability Processes: The Private Finance Initiative in the UK , 2001 .

[53]  G. Bramley.  Quasi-markets and social policy , 1993 .