Load following of Small Modular Reactors (SMR) by cogeneration of hydrogen: A techno-economic analysis

Load following is the possibility for a power plant to adjust its power output according to the demand and electricity price fluctuation throughout the day. In nuclear power plants, the adjustment is usually done by inserting control rods into the reactor pressure vessel. This operation is inherently inefficient as nuclear power cost structure is composed almost entirely of sunk or fixed costs; therefore, lowering the power output, does not significantly reduce operating expenses and the plant is thermo-mechanical stressed. A more attractive option is to maintain the primary circuit at full power and use the excess power for cogeneration. This paper aims to present the techno-economic feasibility of nuclear power plants load following by cogenerating hydrogen. The paper assesses Small Modular nuclear Reactors (SMRs) coupled with: alkaline water electrolysis, high-temperature steam electrolysis, sulphur-iodine cycle. The analysis shows that in the medium term hydrogen from alkaline water electrolysis can be produced at competitive prices. High-temperature steam electrolysis and even more the sulphur-iodine cycle proved to be attractive because of their capability to produce hydrogen with higher efficiency. However, the coupling of SMRs and hydrogen facilities working at high temperature (about 800 °C) still requires substantial R&D to reach commercialisation.

[1]  A. Dutton,et al.  Experience in the design, sizing, economics, and implementation of autonomous wind-powered hydrogen production systems , 2000 .

[2]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Generation IV nuclear reactors: Current status and future prospects , 2013 .

[3]  D. H. Bradhurst,et al.  HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND STORAGE , 1981 .

[4]  S. A. Sherif,et al.  Wind energy and the hydrogen economy—review of the technology , 2005 .

[5]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Load following with Small Modular Reactors (SMR): A real options analysis , 2015 .

[6]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Investment and risk appraisal in energy storage systems: A real options approach , 2016 .

[7]  Ram B. Gupta.  Hydrogen Fuel : Production, Transport, and Storage , 2008 .

[8]  M. Balat.  Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems , 2008 .

[9]  E. Sirtori,et al.  Guide to Cost-benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020 , 2014 .

[10]  J. Mcgowan,et al.  Opportunities for economies of scale with alkaline electrolyzers , 2013 .

[11]  José Manuel Martínez Duart,et al.  Updated hydrogen production costs and parities for conventional and renewable technologies , 2010 .

[12]  Jianli Hu,et al.  An overview of hydrogen production technologies , 2009 .

[13]  F. Mueller-Langer,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes for the hydrogen economy for the short and medium term , 2007 .

[14]  Kazuhiko Kunitomi,et al.  JAEA'S VHTR FOR HYDROGEN AND ELECTRICITY COGENERATION : GTHTR300C , 2007 .

[15]  Hisashi Ninokata,et al.  The design and safety features of the IRIS reactor , 2004 .

[16]  Shusaku Shiozawa,et al.  Development Status on Hydrogen Production Technology using High-temperature Gas-cooled Reactor at JAEA, Japan , 2006 .

[17]  Pablo Sanchis,et al.  Stand-alone operation of an alkaline water electrolyser fed by wind and photovoltaic systems , 2013 .

[18]  A. Shenoy,et al.  H2-MHR conceptual designs based on the sulphur–iodine process and high-temperature electrolysis , 2006 .

[19]  S. Makino,et al.  Hydrogen Production by High Temperature Electrolysis with Nuclear Reactor , 2008 .

[20]  H. Rogner,et al.  Nuclear Power and Sustainable Development , 2010 .

[21]  J. O’Brien,et al.  High-temperature electrolysis for large-scale hydrogen production from nuclear energy – Experimental investigations , 2010 .

[22]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Assessing the economics of large Energy Storage Plants with an optimisation methodology , 2015 .

[23]  Mauro Mancini,et al.  Competitiveness of Small-Medium, New Generation Reactors: A Comparative Study on Capital and O&M Costs , 2008 .

[24]  Sara Boarin,et al.  Cogeneration: An option to facilitate load following in Small Modular Reactors , 2017 .

[25]  Andrea Trianni,et al.  Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe : Lessons learnt from Finland , 2017 .

[26]  Thomas Hamacher,et al.  State-of-the-art of commercial electrolyzers and on-site hydrogen generation for logistic vehicles in South Carolina , 2015 .

[27]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Load Following by Cogeneration: Options for Small Modular Reactors, GEN IV Reactor and Traditional Large Plants , 2017 .