Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units

Objective To evaluate drug interaction software programs and determine their accuracy in identifying drug-drug interactions that may occur in intensive care units. Setting The study was developed in Brazil. Method Drug interaction software programs were identified through a bibliographic search in PUBMED and in LILACS (database related to the health sciences published in Latin American and Caribbean countries). The programs’ sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined to assess their accuracy in detecting drug–drug interactions. The accuracy of the software programs identified was determined using 100 clinically important interactions and 100 clinically unimportant ones. Stockley’s Drug Interactions 8th edition was employed as the gold standard in the identification of drug-drug interaction. Main outcome Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values. Results The programs studied were: Drug Interaction Checker (DIC), Drug-Reax (DR), and Lexi-Interact (LI). DR displayed the highest sensitivity (0.88) and DIC showed the lowest (0.69). A close similarity was observed among the programs regarding specificity (0.88–0.92) and positive predictive values (0.88–0.89). The DIC had the lowest negative predictive value (0.75) and DR the highest (0.91). Conclusion The DR and LI programs displayed appropriate sensitivity and specificity for identifying drug–drug interactions of interest in intensive care units. Drug interaction software programs help pharmacists and health care teams in the prevention and recognition of drug–drug interactions and optimize safety and quality of care delivered in intensive care units.

[1]  J. A. Hammes,et al.  Potential drug interactions prevalence in intensive care units. , 2008, Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva.

[2]  T Molina,et al.  Quality of interaction database management systems , 2009, Farmacia Hospitalaria (English Edition).

[3]  P Pandhi,et al.  Drug Utilization Pattern in the Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital , 2006, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[4]  Hyla H. Polen,et al.  Clinical Decision Support Tools: Performance of Personal Digital Assistant versus Online Drug Information Databases , 2007, Pharmacotherapy.

[5]  A. Wilmer,et al.  Mini-series: II. Clinical aspects. Clinically relevant CYP450-mediated drug interactions in the ICU , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  R. Barrons,et al.  Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. , 2004, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[7]  B. S. Ramos,et al.  Relevancia clínica de las interacciones medicamentosas , 2008 .

[8]  M Francis Dallenbach,et al.  Detecting drug interactions using personal digital assistants in an out-patient clinic. , 2007, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[9]  S. Krähenbühl,et al.  Evaluation of frequently used drug interaction screening programs , 2008, Pharmacy World & Science.

[10]  E. Wittbrodt,et al.  Identifying Drug Usage Patterns in the Intensive Care Unit , 1993, PharmacoEconomics.

[11]  Daniel C Malone,et al.  Evaluation of the Performance of Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Software in Community and Hospital Pharmacies , 2006, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[12]  H. Mann,et al.  Drug-associated disease: cytochrome P450 interactions. , 2006, Critical care clinics.

[13]  T. Albertson,et al.  Drug interactions in the intensive care unit. , 1999, Clinics in chest medicine.

[14]  P A Pham,et al.  Drug–Drug Interaction Programs in Clinical Practice , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[15]  C. Meune,et al.  Mini-series: I. Basic science. Uncertainty and inaccuracy of predicting CYP-mediated in vivo drug interactions in the ICU from in vitro models: focus on CYP3A4 , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[16]  W. Paul Nichol,et al.  Research Paper: Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  W P McKinney,et al.  Pharmacist recognition of potential drug interactions. , 1999, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[18]  Daniel C Malone,et al.  Performance of Drug–Drug Interaction Software for Personal Digital Assistants , 2006, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[19]  P. Amariles,et al.  Interacciones medicamentosas: aproximación para establecer y evaluar su relevancia clínica , 2007 .

[20]  N. Williams Medication administration through enteral feeding tubes. , 2008, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[21]  黄亚明 MedScape , 2009 .

[22]  A. Rodríguez-Terol,et al.  Calidad estructural de las bases de datos de interacciones , 2009 .

[23]  I. Stockley,et al.  Stockley's Drug Interactions , 2007 .

[24]  Diane L. Seger,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Tiering Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts by Severity Increases Compliance Rates , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  R. Kapp Stockley’s Drug Interactions, 6th Edition , 2004 .

[26]  Minh V. Lam,et al.  An Assessment of Free, Online Drug-Drug Interaction Screening Programs (DSPs) , 2003 .