Interdependent Construal of Self and the Endorsement of Conflict Resolution Strategies in Interpersonal, Intergroup, and International Disputes

Intergroup relations are more competitive and discordant than relations between interacting individuals. Social identity theory suggests that this discontinuity should be greatest among individuals who identify strongly with their in-group. To test this prediction, students from countries with collectivistic and individualistic cultures completed a measure of self-construal. They were then asked to identify how they would respond to a conflict, either with another individual, between their group and another group or between their country and another country. Participants responded more negatively to intergroup and international conflicts than to interpersonal conflicts. Self-construal, however, moderated this effect. Controlling for country of origin, students who were high in interdependence endorsed threat more and acceptance of the others’ demands less in an international conflict versus an interpersonal conflict. Those low in interdependence differed less in their endorsement of conflict resolution strategies in an international versus an interpersonal conflict.

[1]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[2]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Individual-Group Discontinuity as a Function of Fear and Greed , 1990 .

[3]  Steve Hinkle,et al.  Recognizing group diversity: Individualist‐collectivist and autonomous‐relational social orientations and their implications for intergroup processes , 1992 .

[4]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[5]  Shinobu Kitayama,et al.  A Collective Fear of the Collective: Implications for Selves and Theories of Selves , 1994 .

[6]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  The Discontinuity Effect in Interpersonal and Intergroup Relations: Generality and Mediation , 1992 .

[7]  Barbara M. Masser,et al.  Life on the Ocean Wave: Testing Some Intergroup Hypotheses in a Naturalistic Setting , 2001 .

[8]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[9]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[11]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[12]  J. Duckitt,et al.  Group identification and intergroup attitudes: a longitudinal analysis in South Africa. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  D. Oyserman.  The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. , 1993 .

[14]  C. Hui.  Measurement of individualism-collectivism , 1988 .

[15]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[16]  T. Singelis,et al.  Some Thoughts on the Future of Cross-Cultural Social Psychology , 2000 .

[17]  E. Lind,et al.  Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. , 1986 .

[18]  J. Howard.  Social Psychology of Identities , 2000 .

[19]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  Unpackaging Culture’s Influence on Self-Esteem and Embarrassability , 1999 .

[20]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[21]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Perceptions of Social Behavior , 1989 .

[22]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social identity, personality, and the self-concept: A self-categorizing perspective. , 1999 .

[23]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[24]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[25]  Ç. Kâğıtçıbaşı.  A critical appraisal of individualism and collectivism: Toward a new formulation. , 1994 .

[26]  K. Leung.  Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. , 1987 .

[27]  J. Fernández-Dols,et al.  Preference for Methods of Conflict Processing in Two Collectivist Cultures , 1992 .

[28]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Differential distrust of groups and individuals. , 1998 .

[29]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Some Determinants of Conflict Avoidance , 1988 .

[30]  W. Fry,et al.  The Role of Group Schema in the Selection of Influence Attempts , 1995 .

[31]  E. Kelly.  Individualism and collectivism , 1901 .

[32]  Andrew F. Simon,et al.  Categorical and dynamic groups: Implications for social perception and intergroup behavior. , 1998 .

[33]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  The Psychology of the Social Self , 2001 .

[34]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement , 1995 .

[35]  M. Bond,et al.  Effects of cultural femininity on preference for methods of conflict processing: A cross-cultural study , 1990 .

[36]  James T. Gire,et al.  Dealing with Disputes: The Influence of Individualism-Collectivism , 1993 .