Characterization and evaluation of a modified local lymph node assay using ATP content as a non-radio isotopic endpoint.

INTRODUCTION The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is an accepted and widely used method for assessing the skin-sensitizing potential of chemicals. Here, we describe a non-radio isotopic modified LLNA in which adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content is used as an endpoint instead of radioisotope (RI); the method is termed LLNA modified by Daicel based on ATP content (LLNA-DA). METHODS Groups of female CBA/JNCrlj mice were treated topically on the dorsum of both ears with test chemicals or a vehicle control on days 1, 2, and 3; an additional fourth application was conducted on day 7. Pretreatment with 1% sodium lauryl sulfate solution was performed 1 h before each application. On day 8, the amount of ATP in the draining auricular lymph nodes was measured as an alternative endpoint by the luciferin-luciferase assay in terms of bioluminescence (relative light units, RLU). A stimulation index (SI) relative to the concurrent vehicle control was derived based on the RLU value, and an SI of 3 was set as the cut-off value. RESULTS Using the LLNA-DA method, 31 chemicals were tested and the results were compared with those of other test methods. The accuracy of LLNA-DA vs LLNA, guinea pig tests, and human tests was 93% (28/30), 80% (20/25), and 79% (15/19), respectively. The estimated concentration (EC) 3 value was calculated and compared with that of the original LLNA. It was found that the EC3 values obtained by LLNA-DA were almost equal to those obtained by the original LLNA. DISCUSSION The SI value based on ATP content is similar to that of the original LLNA as a result of the modifications in the chemical treatment procedure, which contribute to improving the SI value. It is concluded that LLNA-DA is a promising non-RI alternative method for evaluating the skin-sensitizing potential of chemicals.

[1]  I. Kimber,et al.  Cytokine endpoints for the local lymph node assay: consideration of interferon‐γ and interleukin 12 , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[2]  Shuzo Matsumoto,et al.  Evaluation of the proliferative response of lymphocytes by measurement of intracellular ATP , 1984 .

[3]  D A Basketter,et al.  Contact allergy: the local lymph node assay for the prediction of hazard and risk , 2003, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[4]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  I Kimber,et al.  Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay. , 1999, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[6]  J Hilton,et al.  Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. , 1996, Toxicology.

[7]  I. Kimber,et al.  Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  J Hilton,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  P. Ulrich,et al.  Intralaboratory validation of alternative endpoints in the murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergic potential: primary ear skin irritation and ear-draining lymph node hyperplasia induced by topical chemicals , 2001, Archives of Toxicology.

[10]  G F Gerberick,et al.  Phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in lymph nodes draining the ear following exposure to contact allergens and irritants. , 1996, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  Kenji Idehara,et al.  Development of a Modified Local Lymph Node Assay using ATP Measurement as an Endpoint , 2005 .

[12]  B H Margolin,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[13]  I. Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation , 1989, Contact dermatitis.

[14]  Jae H Park,et al.  A nonradioisotopic endpoint for measurement of lymph node cell proliferation in a murine allergic contact dermatitis model, using bromodeoxyuridine immunohistochemistry. , 2002, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[15]  J Hilton,et al.  Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation. , 1998, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[16]  D A Basketter,et al.  Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[17]  N. Tsutsui,et al.  Local lymph node assay with non-radioisotope alternative endpoints. , 2002, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[18]  A. Kligman,et al.  The Identification of Contact Allergens by Animal Assay. the Guinea Pig Maximization Test , 1969 .

[19]  I Kimber,et al.  Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[20]  T. Tsuchiya,et al.  Differences of draining lymph node cell proliferation among mice, rats and guinea pigs following exposure to metal allergens. , 1992, Toxicology.

[21]  W S Stokes,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. The ICCVAM review process. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  M Hatao,et al.  Development of a non-radioactive endpoint in a modified local lymph node assay. , 1999, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[23]  Masahiro Takeyoshi,et al.  Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non‐radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay , 2005, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[24]  G Frank Gerberick,et al.  Use of a B cell marker (B220) to discriminate between allergens and irritants in the local lymph node assay. , 2002, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[25]  I Kimber,et al.  Development of non-radio isotopic endpoint of murine local lymph node assay based on 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation. , 2001, Toxicology letters.

[26]  W S Stokes,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[27]  Miguel Cámara,et al.  Development of a bioluminescent ATP assay to quantify mammalian and bacterial cell number from a mixed population. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[28]  I. Kimber,et al.  Examination of a vehicle for use with water soluble materials in the murine local lymph node assay. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[29]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[30]  H. van Loveren,et al.  An European inter-laboratory validation of alternative endpoints of the murine local lymph node assay: first round. , 2005, Toxicology.

[31]  W. D. de Jong,et al.  Determination of the sensitising activity of the rubber contact sensitisers TMTD, ZDMC, MBT and DEA in a modified local lymph node assay and the effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate pretreatment on local lymph node responses. , 2002, Toxicology.

[32]  E. Buehler,et al.  DELAYED CONTACT HYPERSENSITIVITY IN THE GUINEA PIG. , 1965, Archives of dermatology.

[33]  H. Schuppe,et al.  An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions. , 1998, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[34]  W Slob,et al.  A quantitative method for assessing the sensitizing potency of low molecular weight chemicals using a local lymph node assay: employment of a regression method that includes determination of the uncertainty margins. , 2000, Toxicology.

[35]  D. Basketter,et al.  The skin sensitization potential of resorcinol: experience with the local lymph node assay , 2007, Contact dermatitis.

[36]  Ian Kimber,et al.  A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin‐sensitization testing , 2004, Contact dermatitis.