Tomographic inversion of S-SKS times for shear velocity heterogeneity in D″: Degree 12 and hybrid models

Differential travel times between S (or diffracted S) and SKS were measured to study the global distribution of shear wave velocity heterogeneity in the lowermost 250 km of the mantle (the D″ region). Commencing with ∼3000 S-SKS times with variable qualities, we minimize uneven path coverage by thinning redundantly sampled regions (e.g., the Fiji-Tonga to North America corridor) and collect additional data for sparsely sampled areas, especially in the Southern Hemisphere. About 1500 paths were retained, distributed to reconcile both high-density and homogeneous sampling. We compare (1) spherical harmonic and (2) equal-area block parameterizations of D″ shear velocity heterogeneity for identical minimum resolving lengths and mean model errors. We show that the two parameterizations result in indistinguishable patterns of heterogeneity and power distribution for resolution down to a block size of 4.5°×4.5° and maximum spherical harmonic degree of 40. We demonstrate synthetically that a high-degree (L) inversion followed by a lower-degree (Ls) spherical harmonic synthesis effectively circumvents model contamination from expansion truncation effects. Tomographic inversion of this data set yields a global distribution of D″ heterogeneity robust up to degree 12. In our preferred model (L = 40, Ls = 12, rms ∼ 1%), surface hotspots and estimated lower mantle plume roots are located in or at edges of low-velocity regions (δVs< −2%), for both the Atlantic-Indian low-velocity corridor as well as the low velocities beneath the central Pacific. Although the above parameterizations entail no intrinsic difference in resolvability, higher resolution is regionally achieved by removing the derived degree 12 model from the data then inverting the corrected residuals using 4.5°×4.5° blocks. This hybrid method prevents power loss at intermediate to long wavelengths from otherwise severe damping and recovers smaller-scale structure where constraints are better than the global average, such as beneath the Pacific and Eurasia. A synthetic recovery test yields resolvability maps that reflect both the path geometry and the quality of data, which help to identify robust features in both the degree 12 and the hybrid D″ models.

[1]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Evidence for anisotropy in the deep mantle beneath Alaska , 1996 .

[2]  K. Bullen Compressibility-Pressure Hypothesis and the Earth's Interior , 1949 .

[3]  M. Weber P- and S-wave reflections from anomalies in the lowermost mantle , 1993 .

[4]  J. Kendall,et al.  Lateral variations in D″ below the Caribbean , 1996 .

[5]  Romanowicz,et al.  Three-dimensional structure at the base of the mantle beneath the central pacific , 1998, Science.

[6]  Harmen Bijwaard,et al.  Tomographic evidence for a narrow whole mantle plume below Iceland , 1999 .

[7]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Seismic evidence that the source of the Iceland hotspot lies at the core–mantle boundary , 1998, Nature.

[8]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Evidence for deep mantle circulation from global tomography , 1997, Nature.

[9]  P. Shearer,et al.  On the structure of the lowermost mantle beneath the southwest Pacific, southeast Asia and Australasia , 1995 .

[10]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Three‐dimensional Fréchet differential kernels for seismicdelay times , 2000 .

[11]  J. Woodhouse,et al.  Complex Shear Wave Velocity Structure Imaged Beneath Africa and Iceland. , 1999, Science.

[12]  C. Young,et al.  Evidence for a shear velocity discontinuity in the lower mantle beneath India and the Indian Ocean , 1987 .

[13]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite‐frequency traveltimes—II. Examples , 2000 .

[14]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Preliminary evidence for a lower mantle shear wave velocity discontinuity beneath the central Pacific , 1993 .

[15]  P. Stark,et al.  Bumps on the core‐mantle boundary: Are they facts or artifacts? , 1993 .

[16]  Williams,et al.  A correlation between ultra-Low basal velocities in the mantle and hot spots , 1998, Science.

[17]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Model Estimations Biased by Truncated Expansions: Possible Artifacts in Seismic Tomography , 1996, Science.

[18]  David J. Stevenson,et al.  Limits on lateral density and velocity variations in the Earth's outer core , 1987 .

[19]  J. Vidale,et al.  Evidence for partial melt at the core–mantle boundary north of Tonga from the strong scattering of seismic waves , 1998, Nature.

[20]  B. Kennett,et al.  Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification , 1991 .

[21]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Modelling D″ structure beneath Central America with broadband seismic data , 1997 .

[22]  B. Kuo Amplitude of Sdiff across Asia: effects of velocity gradient and Qs in the D” region and the asphericity of the mantle , 1999 .

[23]  E. Garnero,et al.  Seismic Evidence for Partial Melt at the Base of Earth's Mantle , 1996, Science.

[24]  Marcelo Assumpção,et al.  Seismic evidence for a fossil mantle plume beneath South America and implications for plate driving forces , 1995, Nature.

[25]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  The fate of slabs inferred from seismic tomography and 130 million years of subduction , 1995 .

[26]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Global mantle shear velocity model developed using nonlinear asymptotic coupling theory , 1996 .

[27]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[28]  T. Lay,et al.  A strongly negative shear velocity gradient and lateral variability in the lowermost mantle beneath the Pacific , 1997 .

[29]  Y. Hamano,et al.  “Skewness” of S‐wave velocity in the mantle , 1999 .

[30]  B. Kuo,et al.  Global shear velocity heterogeneities in the D″ layer: Inversion from Sd‐SKS differential travel times , 1997 .

[31]  G. Laske,et al.  A shear - velocity model of the mantle , 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Thorne Lay,et al.  Seismic evidence for small-scale dynamics in the lowermost mantle at the root of the Hawaiian hotspot , 1998, Nature.

[33]  Norman H. Sleep,et al.  Hotspots and Mantle Plumes' Some Phenomenology , 1990 .

[34]  D. Vasco,et al.  Whole Earth structure estimated from seismic arrival times , 1998 .

[35]  T. Lay,et al.  Effects of D″ anisotropy on seismic velocity models of the outermost core , 1998 .

[36]  C. Young,et al.  Multiple phase analysis of the shear velocity structure in the D″ region beneath Alaska , 1990 .

[37]  B. Kennett,et al.  ELLIPTICITY CORRECTIONS FOR SEISMIC PHASES , 1996 .

[38]  Frank D. Stacey,et al.  The thermal boundary-layer interpretation of D″ and its role as a plume source , 1983 .

[39]  M. Sylvander,et al.  Mapping S-velocity heterogeneities in the D″ region, from SmKS differential travel times , 1996 .

[40]  T. Lay,et al.  Investigation of laterally heterogeneous shear velocity structure in D″ beneath Eurasia , 1992 .

[41]  Wen,et al.  Ultra-Low velocity zones near the core-mantle boundary from broadband PKP precursors , 1998, Science.

[42]  G. Masters,et al.  Lower-mantle structure from ScS–S differential travel times , 1991, Nature.

[43]  G. Mueller,et al.  The reflectivity method; a tutorial , 1985 .

[44]  M. Wysession,et al.  Correction to “Mapping the lowermost mantle using core‐reflected shear waves” by M.E. Wysession, L. Bartkó, and J.B. Wilson , 1995 .

[45]  T. Lay,et al.  A lower mantle S-wave triplication and the shear velocity structure of D" , 1983 .

[46]  Joseph S. Resovsky,et al.  A degree 8 mantle shear velocity model from normal mode observations below 3 mHz , 1999 .

[47]  T. Tanimoto Long-wavelength S-wave velocity structure throughout the mantle , 1990 .

[48]  A. Morelli,et al.  Evidence for an S‐velocity discontinuity in the lowermost mantle beneath the South Eastern Pacific Basin , 1997 .

[49]  McSween Hy,et al.  Evidence for Life in a Martian Meteorite , 1997 .

[50]  H. Nataf,et al.  Seismological detection of a mantle plume? , 1993, Nature.

[51]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  Global Images of the Earth's Interior , 1987, Science.

[52]  R. Parker Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[53]  R. Hilst,et al.  High resolution global tomography : a snapshot of convection in the Earth , 1997 .

[54]  P. Silver SEISMIC ANISOTROPY BENEATH THE CONTINENTS: Probing the Depths of Geology , 1996 .

[55]  B. Steinberger Plumes in a convecting mantle: Models and observations for individual hotspots , 2000 .

[56]  Michael E. Wysession,et al.  Mapping the lowermost mantle using core‐reflected shear waves , 1994 .

[57]  Michael E. Wysession,et al.  Large-scale structure at the core–mantle boundary from diffracted waves , 1996, Nature.

[58]  Wei-jia Su,et al.  Degree 12 model of shear velocity heterogeneity in the mantle , 1994 .

[59]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Seismic detection of a thin laterally varying boundary layer at the base of the mantle beneath the central‐Pacific , 1996 .

[60]  Paul G. Silver,et al.  Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations , 1998 .

[61]  D. Helmberger,et al.  Travel times of S and SKS: Implications for three‐dimensional lower mantle structure beneath the central Pacific , 1993 .

[62]  Adam M. Dziewonski,et al.  Mapping the lower mantle: Determination of lateral heterogeneity in P velocity up to degree and order 6 , 1984 .