In vivo contact areas of the knee in patients with patellar subluxation.

OBJECTIVE Ex vivo studies have suggested that cartilage contact areas and pressure are of high clinical relevance in the etiology of osteoarthritis in patients with patellar subluxation. The aims of this study were therefore to validate in vivo measurements of contact areas with 3D open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to study knee joint contact areas in patients with patellar subluxation at different angles of knee flexion in comparison with healthy subjects. METHODS 3D-MRI data sets of 12 healthy volunteers and eight patients with patellar subluxation were acquired using a standard clinical (1.5 T) and an open (0.2 T) MRI scanner. We compared femoro-patellar and femoro-tibial contact areas obtained with two different sequences from open MRI [dual-echo-steady-state (DESS) and fast-low-angle-shot (FLASH) sequences] with those derived from standard clinical 1.5 T MRI. We then analyzed differences in joint contact areas between healthy subjects and patients with patellar subluxation at 0 degree, 30 degrees, and 90 degrees of knee flexion using open MRI. RESULTS The correlation of the size of contact areas from open MRI with standard clinical MRI data ranged from r = 0.52 to 0.92. Open-MRI DESS displayed a smaller overestimation of joint contact areas (+21% in the femoro-patellar, +12% in the medial femoro-tibial, and +19% in the lateral femoro-tibial compartment) than FLASH (+40%, +37%, +30%, respectively). The femoro-patellar contact areas in patients were significantly reduced in comparison with healthy subjects (-47% at 0 degree, -56% at 30 degrees, and -42% at 90 degrees of flexion; all p < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in femoro-tibial contact areas. CONCLUSIONS Open MRI allows one to quantify joint contact areas of the knee with reasonable accuracy, if an adequate pulse sequence is applied. The technique permits one to clearly identify differences between patients with patellar subluxation and healthy subjects at different flexion angles, demonstrating a significant reduction and lateralization of contact areas in patients. In the future, application of this in vivo technique is of particular interest for monitoring the efficacy of different types of surgical and conservative treatment options for patellar subluxation.

[1]  H Graichen,et al.  A new in vivo technique for determination of 3D kinematics and contact areas of the patello-femoral and tibio-femoral joint. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  F Eckstein,et al.  Validation of cartilage volume and thickness measurements in the human shoulder with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  Samuel R Ward,et al.  Quantification of patellofemoral joint contact area using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  R Huiskes,et al.  The biomechanics of the human patella during passive knee flexion. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  T Stammberger,et al.  Optimization and validation of a rapid high-resolution T1-w 3D FLASH water excitation MRI sequence for the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage volume and thickness. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  O. Karaoğlan,et al.  Kinematic and dynamic axial computed tomography of the patello-femoral joint in patients with anterior knee pain , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  S. Tennant,et al.  Meniscal movement. An in-vivo study using dynamic MRI. , 1999 .

[8]  J. Andrish,et al.  Articular Cartilage Contact Pressure after Tibial Tuberosity Transfer , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  W Herzog,et al.  Joint contact mechanics in the early stages of osteoarthritis. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  D. Wilson,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of a pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  C. Maganaris,et al.  In vivo measurement-based estimations of the moment arm in the human tibialis anterior muscle-tendon unit. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  M. Axe,et al.  1998 Basmajian Student Award Paper: Movement patterns after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a comparison of patients who compensate well for the injury and those who require operative stabilization. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[13]  D. Witoński,et al.  Patellar motion analyzed by kinematic and dynamic axial magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior knee pain syndrome , 1999, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  M. S. Hefzy,et al.  A three-dimensional anatomical model of the human patello-femoral joint, for the determination of patello-femoral motions and contact characteristics. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[15]  Eugene Ozhinsky,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of patellofemoral kinematics with weight-bearing. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Y Yamano,et al.  Kinematics of the Patella in Deep Flexion: Analysis with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  F Eckstein,et al.  Femoro‐tibial and menisco‐tibial translation patterns in patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament deficiency—a potential cause of secondary meniscal tears , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  V C Mow,et al.  A stereophotogrammetric method for determining in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joints, and a comparison with other methods. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Louis F Draganich,et al.  The Effects of Removal and Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on the Contact Characteristics of the Patellofemoral Joint , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient and Reconstructed Knee during Walking * , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[22]  W C Hayes,et al.  Patellofemoral contact pressures. The influence of q-angle and tendofemoral contact. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  H Fukatsu,et al.  Analysis of knee movement with low-field MR equipment--a normal volunteer study. , 1994, Radiation medicine.

[24]  I. Tulikoura,et al.  Diagnostic performance of low field MRI in acute knee injuries. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  N. Fukui,et al.  A modified system of stress radiography for patellofemoral instability. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  F Eckstein,et al.  A non-invasive technique for 3-dimensional assessment of articular cartilage thickness based on MRI. Part 2: Validation using CT arthrography. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  Gretchen B Salsich,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Patellofemoral Joint Contact Area in Individuals Who are Pain Free , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.