Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans

Transcranial electric stimulation is a non-invasive tool that can influence brain activity; however, the parameters necessary to affect local circuits in vivo remain to be explored. Here, we report that in rodents and human cadaver brains, ~75% of scalp-applied currents are attenuated by soft tissue and skull. Using intracellular and extracellular recordings in rats, we find that at least 1 mV/mm voltage gradient is necessary to affect neuronal spiking and subthreshold currents. We designed an ‘intersectional short pulse’ stimulation method to inject sufficiently high current intensities into the brain, while keeping the charge density and sensation on the scalp surface relatively low. We verify the regional specificity of this novel method in rodents; in humans, we demonstrate how it affects the amplitude of simultaneously recorded EEG alpha waves. Our combined results establish that neuronal circuits are instantaneously affected by intensity currents that are higher than those used in conventional protocols.Though transcranial electric stimulation has been used to influence brain activity, it is debated whether neuronal spiking activity is directly affected by commonly-used protocols. Here, the authors quantify the voltage gradients necessary to instantaneously affect neuronal spiking and show that they are higher than commonly-used protocols.

[1]  C. D. Geisler,et al.  A stochastic model of the repetitive activity of neurons. , 1966, Biophysical journal.

[2]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[3]  D. York,et al.  Motor evoked potentials from transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in humans. , 1984, Neurosurgery.

[4]  A. Turner Biochemistry and the central nervous system (fifth edition): By H. McIlwain and H S Bachelard. pp 660. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. 1985. £40 ISBN 0‐443‐01961‐4 , 1986 .

[5]  I. Watkins Advances in nutrition research volume 6: Edited by H Draper. pp 335. plenum press, New York. 1984. $49.50 ISBN 0‐306‐41811‐8 , 1986 .

[6]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Modulation by applied electric fields of Purkinje and stellate cell activity in the isolated turtle cerebellum. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D B McCreery,et al.  Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[8]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Nonsynaptic modulation of neuronal activity in the brain: electric currents and extracellular ions. , 1995, Physiological reviews.

[9]  J. Latikka,et al.  Conductivity of living intracranial tissues. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  B. Sakmann,et al.  In vivo, low-resistance, whole-cell recordings from neurons in the anaesthetized and awake mammalian brain , 2002, Pflügers Archiv.

[11]  A. Priori Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitability , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Live Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[13]  N. Saito,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation through screw electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials. Technical note. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  J. Jefferys,et al.  Effects of uniform extracellular DC electric fields on excitability in rat hippocampal slices in vitro , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Three-dimensional head model Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Lynn Hazan,et al.  Klusters, NeuroScope, NDManager: A free software suite for neurophysiological data processing and visualization , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  N. Logothetis,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Cortical Impedance Spectrum in Monkeys: Implications for Signal Propagation , 2007, Neuron.

[18]  A. Antal,et al.  Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[19]  Caspar M. Schwiedrzik,et al.  Retina or Visual Cortex? The Site of Phosphene Induction by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2009, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[20]  M. Bikson,et al.  Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[21]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[22]  D. McCormick,et al.  Endogenous Electric Fields May Guide Neocortical Network Activity , 2010, Neuron.

[23]  L. Parra,et al.  Low-Intensity Electrical Stimulation Affects Network Dynamics by Modulating Population Rate and Spike Timing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Sean M Montgomery,et al.  The Effect of Spatially Inhomogeneous Extracellular Electric Fields on Neurons , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[26]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of “return” electrode’s position and size , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  C. Koch,et al.  Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Hallett,et al.  A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  P. Schyns,et al.  Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non-Invasive Rhythmic Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[31]  Christof Koch,et al.  Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Lucas C Parra,et al.  The point spread function of the human head and its implications for transcranial current stimulation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  J. Karhu,et al.  tDCS possibly stimulates glial cells , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  M. Belluscio,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Epilepsy by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation , 2012, Science.

[35]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[36]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Accelerates Human Sleep Homeostasis , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Lisa Marshall,et al.  Contribution of transcranial oscillatory stimulation to research on neural networks: an emphasis on hippocampo-neocortical rhythms , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A computer based high-resolution modeling study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  L. Parra,et al.  Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  Christof Koch,et al.  Theta Phase Segregation of Input-Specific Gamma Patterns in Entorhinal-Hippocampal Networks , 2014, Neuron.

[43]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[44]  Eran Stark,et al.  Large-scale, high-density (up to 512 channels) recording of local circuits in behaving animals. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  O. Carter,et al.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[46]  William J. Tyler,et al.  Transdermal neuromodulation of noradrenergic activity suppresses psychophysiological and biochemical stress responses in humans , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Cyrille Rossant,et al.  Spike sorting for large, dense electrode arrays , 2015 .

[48]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in human and nonhuman primates , 2016 .

[50]  J. Winawer,et al.  Linking Electrical Stimulation of Human Primary Visual Cortex, Size of Affected Cortical Area, Neuronal Responses, and Subjective Experience , 2016, Neuron.

[51]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Mapping entrained brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2016, NeuroImage.

[52]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Assessment of polygenic effects links primary open-angle glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[53]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[54]  H. Hirase,et al.  Calcium imaging reveals glial involvement in transcranial direct current stimulation-induced plasticity in mouse brain , 2016, Nature Communications.

[55]  M. Cecchini,et al.  Ultrastructural Characterization of the Lower Motor System in a Mouse Model of Krabbe Disease , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[56]  Christian Keitel,et al.  Flicker-Driven Responses in Visual Cortex Change during Matched-Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[57]  Su Golder,et al.  Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence based update 2016 , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[58]  Marom Bikson,et al.  Extending the parameter range for tDCS: Safety and tolerability of 4 mA stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[59]  Nathanael S Gray,et al.  MELK is not necessary for the proliferation of basal-like breast cancer cells , 2017, eLife.

[60]  Kohitij Kar,et al.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Limitations of ex vivo measurements for in vivo neuroscience , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Suhasa B. Kodandaramaiah,et al.  Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields , 2017, Cell.

[63]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[64]  L. Parra,et al.  Low frequency transcranial electrical stimulation does not entrain sleep rhythms measured by human intracranial recordings , 2017, Nature Communications.