Marrying Step Feed with Secondary Clarifier Improvements to Significantly Increase Peak Wet Weather Treatment Capacity: An Integrated Methodology

The need to increase the peak wet weather secondary treatment capacity of the City of Akron, Ohio, Water Reclamation Facility (WRF) provided the opportunity to test an integrated methodology for maximizing the peak wet weather secondary treatment capacity of activated sludge systems. An initial investigation, consisting of process modeling of the secondary treatment system and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of the existing relatively shallow secondary clarifiers (3.3 and 3.7 m sidewater depth in 30.5 m diameter units), indicated that a significant increase in capacity from 416 000 to 684 000 m3/d or more was possible by adding step feed capabilities to the existing bioreactors and upgrading the existing secondary clarifiers. One of the six treatment units at the WRF was modified, and an extensive 2‐year testing program was conducted to determine the total peak wet weather secondary treatment capacity achievable. The results demonstrated that a peak wet weather secondary treatment capacity approaching 974 000 m3/d is possible as long as secondary clarifier solids and hydraulic loadings could be separately controlled using the step feed capability provided. Excellent sludge settling characteristics are routinely experienced at the City of Akron WRF, raising concerns that the identified peak wet weather secondary treatment capacity could not be maintained should sludge settling characteristics deteriorate for some reason. Computational fluid dynamics analysis indicated that the impact of the deterioration of sludge settling characteristics could be mitigated and the identified peak wet weather secondary treatment capacity maintained by further use of the step feed capability provided to further reduce secondary clarifier solids loading rates at the identified high surface overflow rates. The results also demonstrated that effluent limits not only for total suspended solids (TSS) and five‐day carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (cBOD5) could be maintained, but also for ammonia‐nitrogen and total phosphorous (TP). Although hydraulic limitations in other parts of the WRP prevent this full capacity to be realized, the City is proceeding to implement the modifications identified using this integrated methodology.

[1]  G. Daigger,et al.  Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming, and Other Solids Separation Problems , 2017 .

[2]  G. Daigger,et al.  Characterizing shallow secondary clarifier performance where conventional flux theory over-estimates allowable solids loading rate. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  G. Daigger,et al.  Using Existing Facility to Maximize the Wet Weather Treatment Capacity of the Akron, Oh Water Reclamation Facility: Optimizing Existing Secondary Clarifiers , 2014 .

[4]  G. Ekama,et al.  Assessing the applicability of the 1D flux theory to full-scale secondary settling tank design with a 2D hydrodynamic model. , 2004, Water research.

[5]  G. Daigger,et al.  Using Existing Facility to Maximize the Wet Weather Treatment Capacity of the Akron, Ohio, Water Reclamation Facility: Operating Step Feed and Improved Clarifiers to Process Peak Flow , 2016 .

[6]  G. Daigger,et al.  Using Existing Facility to Maximize the Wet Weather Treatment Capacity of the Akron, Ohio, Water Reclamation Facility: Sludge Settling Theory and State Point Analysis Do Not Characterize Ultimate Capacity of Shallow Clarifiers , 2015 .

[7]  R. Merlo,et al.  HOW MUCH CAPACITY Does It Really Have , 2010 .

[8]  Alonso Griborio,et al.  A PUBLIC DOMAIN SETTLING TANK MODEL , 2005 .

[9]  W. Hegemann Upgrading wastewater treatment plants. , 2000, Schriftenreihe des Vereins fur Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene.

[10]  Glen T. Daigger,et al.  Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants , 1998 .

[11]  Gary Newman,et al.  Design and operations experience with flocculator-clarifiers in large plants , 1996 .

[12]  G. Daigger Development of refined clarifier operating diagrams using an updated settling characteristics database , 1995 .

[13]  DataNotAvailable Discussion of Evaluation of Activated Sludge Thickening Theories by Richard I. Dick and Benjamin B. Ewing , 1968 .