Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game

In the Ultimatum Game, a proposer suggests how to split a sum of money with a responder. If the responder rejects the proposal, both players get nothing. Rejection of unfair offers is regarded as a form of punishment implemented by fair-minded individuals, who are willing to impose the cooperation norm at a personal cost. However, recent research using other experimental frameworks has observed non-negligible levels of antisocial punishment by competitive, spiteful individuals, which can eventually undermine cooperation. Using two large-scale experiments, this note explores the nature of Ultimatum Game punishers by analyzing their behavior in a Dictator Game. In both studies, the coexistence of two entirely different sub-populations is confirmed: prosocial punishers on the one hand, who behave fairly as dictators, and spiteful (antisocial) punishers on the other, who are totally unfair. The finding has important implications regarding the evolution of cooperation and the behavioral underpinnings of stable social systems.

[1]  W. Güth,et al.  An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , 1982 .

[2]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Serotonin Modulates Behavioral Reactions to Unfairness , 2008, Science.

[3]  Angel Sánchez,et al.  Altruism may arise from individual selection. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  David G. Rand,et al.  Anti-social Punishment Can Prevent the Co-evolution of Punishment and Cooperation , 2010 .

[5]  James H. Fowler,et al.  Egalitarian motives in humans , 2007, Nature.

[6]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[7]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Equality versus self-interest in the brain: Differential roles of anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Reinikka,et al.  Making Services Work for Poor People , 2004 .

[9]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  Corruption drives the emergence of civil society , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms , 2002, Human nature.

[11]  S. Gächter,et al.  The Long-Run Benefits of Punishment , 2008, Science.

[12]  D. Filmer.  Determinants of Health and Education Outcomes Background Note for World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People , 2003 .

[13]  S. Israel,et al.  Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene Associated with Fairness Preference in Ultimatum Game , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  R. Boyd,et al.  Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Yang Li,et al.  Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J. Horowitz,et al.  Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments , 1994 .

[17]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  The Sunny Side of Fairness , 2008, Psychological science.

[18]  Florian Artinger,et al.  In Others' Shoes: Do Individual Differences in Empathy and Theory of Mind Shape Social Preferences? , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Diminishing Reciprocal Fairness by Disrupting the Right Prefrontal Cortex , 2006, Science.

[20]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Leaving the loners alone: evolution of cooperation in the presence of antisocial punishment. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Lorena R. R. Gianotti,et al.  A Neural Marker of Costly Punishment Behavior , 2010, Psychological science.

[22]  E. Fehr,et al.  Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Suzanne Sadedin,et al.  Evolving Righteousness in a Corrupt World , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Simon Gächter,et al.  The limits of self-governance when cooperators get punished: Experimental evidence from urban and rural Russia , 2011 .

[25]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Emergence of responsible sanctions without second order free riders, antisocial punishment or spite , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Reasons for Conflict: Lessons from Bargaining Experiments , 2003 .

[28]  David G. Rand,et al.  The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. , 2011, Nature communications.

[29]  R. Nagel,et al.  Experimental results on ultimatum games with incomplete information , 1993 .

[30]  J. Henrich,et al.  Costly Punishment Across Human Societies , 2006, Science.

[31]  Hawaii,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S6 Tables S1 and S2 Database S1 Antisocial Punishment across Societies , 2022 .

[32]  D. Levine.  Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments , 1998 .

[33]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[34]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments , 2000 .

[35]  A. Riedl,et al.  The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  H. Gintis,et al.  Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical , 2007 .

[37]  Fumitoshi Kodaka,et al.  Honesty mediates the relationship between serotonin and reaction to unfairness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[39]  Ulrich Müller,et al.  Serotonin Modulates Striatal Responses to Fairness and Retaliation in Humans , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[41]  J. Henrich,et al.  Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment , 2010, Science.

[42]  G. Szabó,et al.  Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[43]  J. Bryson,et al.  Homo homini lupus? Explaining antisocial punishment , 2013 .

[44]  Keith Jensen,et al.  Punishment and spite, the dark side of cooperation , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Experimental subjects are not different , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[46]  A. Roth,et al.  Considerations of Fairness and Strategy: Experimental Data from Sequential Games , 1992 .

[47]  David G. Rand,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Delia Baldassarri,et al.  Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Georg Kirchsteiger,et al.  The role of envy in ultimatum games , 1994 .

[50]  A. Espín,et al.  Accepting zero in the ultimatum game does not reflect selfish preferences , 2013 .

[51]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Disentangling self- and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: an fMRI study. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[52]  M. Kocher,et al.  Social background, cooperative behavior, and norm enforcement , 2012 .

[53]  H. Gintis,et al.  A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution , 2011 .

[54]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game , 2003, Science.