Using a Design of Experiments Approach to Inform the Design of Hybrid Synthetic Yeast Promoters.

Hybrid promoter engineering takes advantage of the modular nature of eukaryotic promoters by combining discrete promoter motifs to confer novel regulatory function. By combinatorially screening sequence libraries for trans-acting transcriptional operators, activators, repressors and core promoter sequences, it is possible to derive constitutive or inducible promoter collections covering a broad range of expression strengths. However, combinatorial approaches to promoter design can result in highly complex, multidimensional design spaces, which can be experimentally costly to thoroughly explore in vivo. Here, we describe an in silico pipeline for the design of hybrid promoter libraries that employs a Design of Experiments (DoE) approach to reduce experimental burden and efficiently explore the promoter fitness landscape. We also describe a software pipeline to ensure that the designed promoter sequences are compatible with the YTK assembly standard.

[1]  Harold Fellermann,et al.  Design of experiments and the virtual PCR simulator: An online game for pharmaceutical scientists and biotechnologists , 2019, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[2]  Rajesh Mehrotra,et al.  Towards combinatorial transcriptional engineering. , 2017, Biotechnology advances.

[3]  Joseph H. Davis,et al.  Design, construction and characterization of a set of insulated bacterial promoters , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  Eric J Alm,et al.  Metagenomic mining of regulatory elements enables programmable species-selective gene expression , 2018, Nature Methods.

[5]  Jay D. Keasling,et al.  Engineering of synthetic, stress-responsive yeast promoters , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  R. Hector,et al.  A Synthetic Hybrid Promoter for Xylose-Regulated Control of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces Yeasts , 2016, Molecular Biotechnology.

[7]  Peter Urbach,et al.  Randomization and the Design of Experiments , 1985, Philosophy of Science.

[8]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Engineering biological systems using automated biofoundries. , 2017, Metabolic engineering.

[9]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  A Synthetic Biology Framework for Programming Eukaryotic Transcription Functions , 2012, Cell.

[10]  J Craig Venter,et al.  One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  S. Hahn,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transcription Factor Regulation and Function, Mechanisms of Initiation, and Roles of Activators and Coactivators , 2011, Genetics.

[12]  Xinyao Lu,et al.  A synthetic hybrid promoter for D-xylonate production at low pH in the tolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes , 2017, Bioengineered.

[13]  Andrew Phillips,et al.  Characterization of Intrinsic Properties of Promoters , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[14]  Douglas C. Friedman,et al.  Building a global alliance of biofoundries , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  William C. Deloache,et al.  A Highly Characterized Yeast Toolkit for Modular, Multipart Assembly. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[16]  James Alastair McLaughlin,et al.  SynBioHub: A Standards-Enabled Design Repository for Synthetic Biology. , 2018, ACS synthetic biology.

[17]  Ting Wang,et al.  An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  David R. McMillen,et al.  Design and characterization of a dual-mode promoter with activation and repression capability for tuning gene expression in yeast , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Rational Diversification of a Promoter Providing Fine-Tuned Expression and Orthogonal Regulation for Synthetic Biology , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Ribozyme-based insulator parts buffer synthetic circuits from genetic context , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Design, implementation and practice of JBEI-ICE: an open source biological part registry platform and tools , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Modularity, context-dependence, and insulation in engineered biological circuits , 2015 .

[23]  Drew Endy,et al.  Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements , 2013, Nature Methods.

[24]  Jay D. Keasling,et al.  A combinatorial approach to synthetic transcription factor‐promoter combinations for yeast strain engineering , 2017, Yeast.

[25]  Rishi Garg,et al.  Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  Hal S. Alper,et al.  Promoter engineering: Recent advances in controlling transcription at the most fundamental level , 2013, Biotechnology journal.

[27]  S. Aves,et al.  Design of Experiments Methodology to Build a Multifactorial Statistical Model Describing the Metabolic Interactions of Alcohol Dehydrogenase Isozymes in the Ethanol Biosynthetic Pathway of the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2018, ACS synthetic biology.

[28]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Genetic circuit design automation , 2016, Science.

[29]  Thomas Lux,et al.  Rapid, Heuristic Discovery and Design of Promoter Collections in Non-Model Microbes for Industrial Applications. , 2019, ACS synthetic biology.

[30]  Patrick Fickers,et al.  New inducible promoter for gene expression and synthetic biology in Yarrowia lipolytica , 2017, Microbial Cell Factories.

[31]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Highly-efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming , 2015, Nature Methods.

[32]  T. Lu,et al.  Tunable and Multifunctional Eukaryotic Transcription Factors Based on CRISPR/Cas , 2013, ACS synthetic biology.

[33]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  RNA processing enables predictable programming of gene expression , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  T. Ellis,et al.  Construction of hybrid regulated mother-specific yeast promoters for inducible differential gene expression , 2018, PloS one.

[35]  J. Fernández-López,et al.  Taguchi design-based enhancement of heavy metals bioremoval by agroindustrial waste biomass from artichoke. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[36]  Hal S. Alper,et al.  The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters , 2015, Nature Communications.

[37]  S Wold,et al.  Quantitative sequence-activity models (QSAM)--tools for sequence design. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  Anurag S Rathore,et al.  Design of experiments applications in bioprocessing: Concepts and approach , 2014, Biotechnology progress.

[39]  John Love,et al.  Synthetic promoter design for new microbial chassis , 2016, Biochemical Society transactions.

[40]  Xianjun Chen,et al.  Synthetic dual-input mammalian genetic circuits enable tunable and stringent transcription control by chemical and light , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[41]  Krešimir Josić,et al.  Tuning the dynamic range of bacterial promoters regulated by ligand-inducible transcription factors , 2018, Nature Communications.

[42]  M. Blenner,et al.  Engineering Promoter Architecture in Oleaginous Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. , 2016, ACS synthetic biology.

[43]  Ernst Oberortner,et al.  Streamlining the Design-to-Build Transition with Build-Optimization Software Tools. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.