Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning

Multimedia learning occurs when students build mental representations from words and pictures that are presented to them (e.g., printed text and illustrations or narration and animation). The promise of multimedia learning is that students can learn more deeply from well-designed multimedia messages consisting of words and pictures than from more traditional modes of communication involving words alone. This article explores a program of research aimed at determining (a) research-based principles for the design of multimedia explanations—which can be called methods, and (b) the extent to which methods are effective across different learning environments—which can be called media. A review of research on the design of multimedia explanations conducted in our lab at Santa Barbara shows (a) a multimedia effect—in which students learn more deeply from words and pictures than from words alone—in both book-based and computer-based environments, (b) a coherence effect—in which students learn more deeply when extraneous material is excluded rather than included—in both book-based and computer-based environments, (c) a spatial contiguity effect—in which students learn more deeply when printed words are placed near rather than far from corresponding pictures—in both book-based and computer-based environments, and (d) a personalization effect—in which students learn more deeply when words are presented in conversational rather than formal style—both in computer-based environments containing spoken words and those using printed words. Overall, our results provide four examples in which the same instructional design methods are effective across different media.  2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[2]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training , 1997 .

[3]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learningwith media: Restructuring the debate , 1994 .

[4]  J. Bruer Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom , 1993 .

[5]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[6]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Research-based principles for the design of instructional messages: The case of multimedia explanations , 1999 .

[7]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[8]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[9]  R. Mayer Systematic Thinking Fostered by Illustrations in Scientific Text , 1989 .

[10]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[11]  Otto Jelsma,et al.  Training for reflective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills , 1992 .

[12]  M. Wittrock Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[13]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures , 1989 .

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? , 1997 .

[15]  K. Scherer,et al.  How Seductive Details Do Their Damage : A Theory of Cognitive Interest in Science Learning , 2004 .

[16]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[17]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[18]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text , 1995 .

[20]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[21]  Malcolm L. Fleming,et al.  Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences , 1993 .

[22]  R. Kozma Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .

[23]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[24]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer , 1999 .

[25]  G. Salomon Interaction of media, cognition and learning , 1979 .

[26]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  A reply: Media and methods , 1994 .

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. , 2001 .

[28]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[29]  R. Clark Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[30]  R. Mayer,et al.  The Role of Interest in Learning From Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction Between Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest , 1997 .

[31]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[32]  J. Bransford How people learn , 2000 .

[33]  Lawrence J. Najjar Principles of Educational Multimedia User Interface Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.