Adaptive Sensor Fault Detection and Identification Using Particle Filter Algorithms

Sensor fault detection and identification (FDI) is a process of detecting and validating sensor's fault status. Because FDI guarantees system reliable performance, it has received much attention recently. In this paper, we address the problem of online sensor fault identification and validation. For a physical sensor validation system, it contains transitions between sensor normal and faulty states, change of system parameters, and a fusion of noisy readings. A common dynamic state-space model with continuous state variables and observations cannot handle this problem. To circumvent this limitation, we adopt a Markov switch dynamic state-space model to simulate the system: we use discrete-state variables to model sensor states and continuous variables to track the change of the system parameters. Problems in Markov switch dynamic state-space model can be well solved by particle filters, which are popularly used in solving problems in digital communications. Among them, mixture Kalman filter (MKF) and stochastic M-algorithm (SMA) have very good performance, both in accuracy and efficiency. In this paper, we plan to incorporate these two algorithms into the sensor validation problem, and compare the effectiveness and complexity of MKF and SMA methods under different situations in the simulation with an existing algorithm - interactive multiple models.

[1]  Brian C. Williams,et al.  Hybrid estimation of complex systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[2]  P. Djurić,et al.  Particle filtering , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[3]  Ann E. Nicholson,et al.  Dynamic Belief Networks for Discrete Monitoring , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst..

[4]  Yaakov Bar-Shalom,et al.  Multitarget-Multisensor Tracking , 1995 .

[5]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Bayesian detection for BLAST , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  Ann E. Nicholson,et al.  Sensor Validation Using Dynamic Belief Networks , 1992, UAI.

[8]  Yuji Matsumoto,et al.  Particle Filter , 2022 .

[9]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Auxiliary particle filter robot localization from high-dimensional sensor observations , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[10]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Detection and diagnosis of sensor and actuator failures using IMM estimator , 1998 .

[11]  C. L. Philip Chen,et al.  Design of Intelligent Acceleration Schedules for Extending the Life of Aircraft Engines , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[12]  Yufei Huang,et al.  Joint symbol detection and timing estimation with stochastic M-algorithm , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  Guanzhong Dai,et al.  Fault Detection and Identification of Dynamic Systems using Multiple Feedforward Neural Networks , 1996 .

[14]  Alan S. Willsky,et al.  A survey of design methods for failure detection in dynamic systems , 1976, Autom..

[15]  Frédéric Kratz,et al.  Sensor fault detection using fuzzy logic and neural networks , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference - SMC.

[16]  Mario Innocenti,et al.  Kalman filters and neural-network schemes for sensor validation in flight control systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[17]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo methods for dynamic systems , 1997 .

[18]  Alf Isaksson,et al.  A parametric statistical approach to FDI for the industrial actuator benchmark , 1995 .

[19]  Paul M. Frank,et al.  Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy: A survey and some new results , 1990, Autom..

[20]  Timo Sorsa,et al.  Neural networks in process fault diagnosis , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[21]  Xiao Xu,et al.  Sensor Validation and Fault Detection Using Neural Networks , 1999 .

[22]  Visakan Kadirkamanathan,et al.  Particle filtering based likelihood ratio approach to fault diagnosis in nonlinear stochastic systems , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[23]  John B. Anderson,et al.  Sequential Coding Algorithms: A Survey and Cost Analysis , 1984, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[24]  Y. Bar-Shalom,et al.  The interacting multiple model algorithm for systems with Markovian switching coefficientsY. Bar-Shalom , 1988 .

[25]  C. L. Philip Chen,et al.  Model-Based Sensor Validation for a Turbofan Engine Using Auto-Associative Neural Networks , 2003 .

[26]  Silvio Simani,et al.  Diagnosis techniques for sensor faults of industrial processes , 2000, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[27]  A. Doucet,et al.  Adaptive MAP multi-user detection for fading CDMA channels , 2000, Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing (Cat. No.00TH8496).

[28]  Boutaieb Dahhou,et al.  A combined analytical and knowledge based method for fault detection and isolation , 2003, EFTA 2003. 2003 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8696).

[29]  D. Magill Optimal adaptive estimation of sampled stochastic processes , 1965 .

[30]  Rong Chen,et al.  Adaptive joint detection and decoding in flat-fading channels via mixture Kalman filtering , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[31]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Adaptive real-time particle filters for robot localization , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[32]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Extending expectation propagation for graphical models , 2005 .

[33]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Mixture Kalman filters , 2000 .

[34]  Simon J. Godsill,et al.  Monte Carlo smoothing with application to audio signal enhancement , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..