SEQUENCE EVOLUTION OF THE SPERM LIGAND ZONADHESIN CORRELATES NEGATIVELY WITH BODY WEIGHT DIMORPHISM IN PRIMATES

Abstract Sexual selection has repeatedly been shown to be the probable driving force behind the positive Darwinian evolution of genes affecting male reproductive success. Here we compare the sequence evolution of the sperm ligand zonadhesin with body mass dimorphism in primates. In contrast to previous related studies, the present approach takes into account not only catarrhine primates, but also platyrrhines and lemurs. In detail, we analyze the sequence evolution of concatenated zonadhesin fragments (555 bp) of four Lemuroidea, five Platyrrhini, and seven Catarrhini, using the rate ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dn/ds = ω). Unexpectedly, subsequent regression analyzes between ω estimates for the terminal branches of a primate phylogeny and residual male body mass reveal that sequence evolution of zonadhesin decreases with increasing sexual dimorphism in body weight. Mapping published mating system classifications onto these results illustrates that unimale breeding species show a tendency for rather slow sequence evolution of zonadhesin and comparably pronounced sexual dimorphism in body weight. Female choice and sperm competition can be assumed to drive the evolution of zonadhesin. We speculate that the level of sperm competition is lower in more sexually dimorphic primates because males of these species monopolize access to fertile females more successfully. Thus, variation in sperm competition may be driving the observed negative correlation of sequence evolution and sexual dimorphism in body weight.

[1]  D. Garbers,et al.  A Sperm Membrane Protein That Binds in a Species-specific Manner to the Egg Extracellular Matrix Is Homologous to von Willebrand Factor (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  H. Zischler,et al.  Sequence evolution, processing, and posttranslational modification of zonadhesin D domains in primates, as inferred from cDNA data. , 2005, Gene.

[3]  Sexual dimorphism in primate evolution. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  F. Colmenares,et al.  One‐male units and clans in a colony of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas hamadryas): effect of male number and clan cohesion on feeding success , 2006, American journal of primatology.

[5]  Carel P. van Schaik,et al.  The Social Organisation of a Population of Sumatran Orang-Utans , 2002, Folia Primatologica.

[6]  Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond,et al.  HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies , 2005, Bioinform..

[7]  P. Kappeler Intrasexual selection in Mirza coquereli : evidence for scramble competition polygyny in a solitary primate , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  A. Dixson,et al.  Male dominance and genetically determined reproductive success in the mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx) , 1993, Primates.

[9]  Yong Wang,et al.  An index of substitution saturation and its application. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[10]  N. Goldman,et al.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. , 2000, Genetics.

[11]  T. A. Hall,et al.  BIOEDIT: A USER-FRIENDLY BIOLOGICAL SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT EDITOR AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR WINDOWS 95/98/ NT , 1999 .

[12]  P. Garber,et al.  Ontogenetic variation in small-bodied New World primates: implications for patterns of reproduction and infant care. , 1997, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[13]  Peter M. Kappeler,et al.  Mouse lemurs in space and time: a test of the socioecological model , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. , 1998, Genetics.

[15]  D. Garbers,et al.  Species Diversity in the Structure of Zonadhesin, a Sperm-specific Membrane Protein Containing Multiple Cell Adhesion Molecule-like Domains* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  H. Kishino,et al.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  G. Parker The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in fish , 1992 .

[18]  A. Dixson,et al.  Sperm competition: Motility and the midpiece in primates , 2002, Nature.

[19]  M. Solignac,et al.  Mating System in Mouse Lemurs: Theories and Facts, Using Analysis of Paternity , 2003, Folia Primatologica.

[20]  P. Ladurner,et al.  Bigger testes do work more: experimental evidence that testis size reflects testicular cell proliferation activity in the marine invertebrate, the free-living flatworm Macrostomum sp. , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  X. Xia,et al.  DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[22]  Bruce T Lahn,et al.  Rate of molecular evolution of the seminal protein gene SEMG2 correlates with levels of female promiscuity , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[23]  J. Plavcan Sexual Selection in Primates: Sexual selection, measures of sexual selection, and sexual dimorphism in primates , 2004 .

[24]  A. Fuentes Hylobatid communities: Changing views on pair bonding and social organization in hominoids. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  H. Zischler,et al.  Tandem Repetitive D Domains of the Sperm Ligand Zonadhesin Evolve Faster in the Paralogue Than in the Orthologue Comparison , 2006, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[26]  M. O'Rand,et al.  Zonadhesin: Characterization, Localization, and Zona Pellucida Binding1 , 2001, Biology of reproduction.

[27]  W. Swanson,et al.  The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  J. Fietz Mating system of Microcebus murinus , 1999, American journal of primatology.

[29]  S. Larson,et al.  Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates , 1981, Nature.

[30]  J. Mitani,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism, the Operational Sex Ratio, and the Intensity of Male Competition in Polygynous Primates , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[31]  C. Nunn,et al.  Females drive primate social evolution , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond,et al.  A genetic algorithm approach to detecting lineage-specific variation in selection pressure. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  N. Goldman,et al.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[34]  S. Muse,et al.  A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  N. Wedell Ejaculate size in bushcrickets: the importance of being large , 1997 .

[36]  P. Lindenfors Sexually antagonistic selection on primate size , 2002 .

[37]  D. Hosken,et al.  Sperm competition in bats , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  N. Rowe The Pictorial Guide to the Living Primates , 1996 .

[39]  Gerald J. Wyckoff,et al.  Rapid evolution of male reproductive genes in the descent of man , 2000, Nature.

[40]  V. Winfrey,et al.  Processing, localization and binding activity of zonadhesin suggest a function in sperm adhesion to the zona pellucida during exocytosis of the acrosome. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[41]  L. A. Whittingham,et al.  Sperm competition and the evolution of testes size in birds , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[42]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Scaling of Sexual Dimorphism in Body Mass: A Phylogenetic Analysis of Rensch's Rule in Primates , 2002, International Journal of Primatology.

[43]  U. Reichard,et al.  Rethinking monogamy: the gibbon case , 2000 .

[44]  H. Zischler,et al.  Identification of a positively evolving putative binding region with increased variability in posttranslational motifs in zonadhesin MAM domain 2. , 2005, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[45]  E. Ranta,et al.  Reinventing the wheel: analysis of sexual dimorphism in body size , 1994 .

[46]  J. Zhang,et al.  Rapid evolution of a primate sperm protein: relaxation of functional constraint or positive Darwinian selection? , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.

[47]  A. Dixson,et al.  Sexual behavior, reproductive physiology and sperm competition in male mammals , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[48]  J. V. Hooff,et al.  Sexual Selection in Primates: Alternative male reproductive strategies: male bimaturism in orangutans , 2004 .

[49]  P. Lindenfors,et al.  Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection , 1998 .

[50]  R. Nielsen,et al.  Pervasive adaptive evolution in mammalian fertilization proteins. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[51]  M W Bruford,et al.  Philopatry and reproductive success in Bornean orang‐utans (Pongo pygmaeus) , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[52]  P. M. Kappeler Patterns of sexual dimorphism in body weight among prosimian primates. , 1991, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[53]  C. Wiklund,et al.  Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae , 1991 .