Changes in brain activation associated with backlash magnitude: a step toward quantitative evaluation of maneuverability

In recent years, there have been many studies on human–machine cooperative systems. Studies evaluating human maneuverability by questionnaire and operating performance have been reported; however, quantitative analyses of human perception when operating a machine have not been conducted. The present study focuses on mechanical backlash to evaluate maneuverability quantitatively. The purpose of this study is to propose a method to quantitatively evaluate the perception of mechanical backlash. To evaluate the degree of backlash perception, biological information of subjects was measured while they used the fingertips of their right hand to rotate a mechanism under different magnitudes of backlash: 1.3, 1.0, 0.7, and 0.4 mm. Biological information including higher brain functions and surface potential signals were measured using near-infrared spectroscopy and surface electromyography, respectively. On a questionnaire after each trial, the subjects reported if they could perceive the mechanical backlash using a four-point scale (1: hardly; 2: a little; 3: somewhat; 4: clearly). The results of the questionnaire on the magnitude of the backlash indicated that subjects were able to perceive all of the backlash conditions at nearly the same level. We confirmed that changing the magnitude of the backlash changed the brain activation state.

[1]  Zhiwei Luo,et al.  On NIRS-based brain-robot interface , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[2]  P. Bawa,et al.  Bilateral responses of upper limb muscles to transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Yoji Yamada,et al.  Proposal of Skill-Assist: a system of assisting human workers by reflecting their skills in positioning tasks , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[4]  Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad,et al.  Experimental performance evaluation of a haptic training simulation system , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Human power extender: an example of human-machine interaction via the transfer of power and information signals , 1998, AMC'98 - Coimbra. 1998 5th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control. Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8354).

[6]  Hyeon-Min Bae,et al.  Efficient Data Extraction Method for Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) Systems With High Spatial and Temporal Resolution , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[7]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Five-dimensional neuroimaging: Localization of the time–frequency dynamics of cortical activity , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  Hendrik Van Brussel,et al.  Human-inspired robot assistant for fast point-to-point movements , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  N. Carlson Physiology of behavior , 1977 .

[11]  Masakatsu G. Fujie,et al.  Brain activation in parietal area during manipulation with a surgical robot simulator , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[12]  N. Kuboyama,et al.  Changes in ipsilateral motor cortex activity during a unilateral isometric finger task are dependent on the muscle contraction force , 2014, Physiological measurement.

[13]  P. Magistretti,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of brain energy metabolism and their relevance to functional brain imaging. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  Affect-sensitive human-robot cooperation - theory and experiments , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[15]  Hikaru Inooka,et al.  Subjective Evaluation for Maneuverability of a Robot Cooperating with Humans , 2002, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[16]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[17]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[18]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  David G. Simons,et al.  Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction : The Trigger Point Manual , 1992 .

[20]  Eiko Hatakeyama,et al.  A comparison of cerebral activity in the prefrontal region between young adults and the elderly while driving. , 2007, Journal of physiological anthropology.

[21]  Atsushi Maki,et al.  Non-invasive brain-function imaging by optical topography , 2005 .