Reinforcement in applied settings: figuring out ahead of time what will work.

This article reviews the practical value of conceptual attempts to specify the circumstances of reinforcement ahead of time. Improvements are traced from the transituational-reinforcer approach of Meehl (1950), through the probability-differential model of Premack (1959, 1965), to the response deprivation and disequilibrium approach (Timberlake, 1980, 1984; Timberlake & Allison, 1974). The application value of each approach is evaluated on the grounds of simplicity, accuracy, and adaptability. The article shows that the disequilibrium approach accounts for and extends current empirically driven techniques of reinforcement control and examines some of its limitations. The disequilibrium approach clarifies how current knowledge can be used to predict more accurately the circumstances of reinforcement and invites the collaboration of applied and basic research in its further development.

[1]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[2]  A. M. Dickinson.  The Detrimental Effects of Extrinsic Reinforcement on “Intrinsic Motivation” , 1989, The Behavior analyst.

[3]  María G. Cisneros-Solís,et al.  MEDICAL ANNUAL , 1958, Journal of The Royal Naval Medical Service.

[4]  R. Van Houten,et al.  Movement suppression time-out for undesirable behavior in psychotic and severely developmentally delayed children. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance , 1974 .

[6]  G. Birchler.  Marital Therapy: Strategies Based on Social Learning and Behavior Exchange Principles , 1981 .

[7]  P. J. Krantz,et al.  A modified incidental-teaching procedure for autistic youth: acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. , 1983, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  R. Bootzin,et al.  The token economy: an evaluative review. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  M. Dougher.  Clinical effects of response deprivation and response satiation procedures , 1983 .

[10]  C. Crowell,et al.  The use of response deprivation to increase the academic performance of EMR students. , 1985, Applied research in mental retardation.

[11]  C. Crowell,et al.  Response deprivation, reinforcement, and instrumental academic performance in an EMR classroom , 1982 .

[12]  J. Dattilo.  Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals. , 1986, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  W. Timberlake.  A Molar Equilibrium Theory of Learned Performance1 , 1980 .

[14]  J. Allison.  Contrast, induction, facilitation, suppression, and conservation. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  Holburn Cs,et al.  Effects of response satiation procedures in the treatment of aerophagia. , 1986 .

[16]  J. Kagel,et al.  Maximization theory in behavioral psychology , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Beha Vior Regula Tion and Learned Performance: Some Misapprehensions and Disagreements , 2022 .

[18]  D. Reid,et al.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences. , 1988, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  D. Wacker,et al.  Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[20]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Hidden costs of reward : new perspectives on the psychology of human motivation , 1978 .

[21]  B. Hart,et al.  Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. , 1975, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[22]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation? , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Michael D. Zeiler,et al.  Predictability, correlation, and contiguity , 1981 .

[24]  D. Premack,et al.  Rate differential reinforcement in monkey manipulation. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  D. Premack.  Toward empirical behavior laws. I. positive reinforcement. , 1959, Psychological review.

[26]  D. Premack.  Prediction of the Comparative Reinforcement Values of Running and Drinking , 1963, Science.

[27]  M. Dougher,et al.  Effects of response satiation procedures in the treatment of aerophagia. , 1986, American journal of mental deficiency.

[28]  C. Crowell,et al.  An alternative approach to reinforcement for applied researchers: Response deprivation , 1981 .

[29]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Reversibility of reinforcement between eating and running by schedule changes: A comparison of hypotheses and models , 1979 .

[30]  J J McDowell,et al.  The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. , 1982, The American psychologist.

[31]  W. Timberlake,et al.  System-specific differences in behavior regulation: overrunning and underdrinking in molar nondepriving schedules. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  J V Brady,et al.  Motivational effects of smoked marijuana: behavioral contingencies and low-probability activities. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[33]  P. Meehl.  On the circularity of the law of effect. , 1950 .

[34]  R. L. Michael,et al.  The utility of verbal and behavioral assessments of value. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[35]  J. Allison,et al.  Bliss points, stop lines, and performance under schedule constraint. , 1987 .

[36]  W. Timberlake,et al.  On the distinction between open and closed economies. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  M. Medland,et al.  Good-behavior game: a replication and systematic analysis. , 1972, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[38]  B. Hart,et al.  Establishing use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. , 1968, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  A. Kazdin.  The token economy: a decade later. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[40]  J. Staddon.  Operant behavior as adaptation to constraint. , 1979 .

[41]  Stephen José Hanson,et al.  Regulation during challenge: A general model of learned performance under schedule constraint. , 1983 .

[42]  A. Logue.  Research on self-control: An integrating framework , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[43]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Reinforcement and substitution in humans: a multiple-response analysis. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[44]  R. Gardner,et al.  Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to the law of effect , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  B. Iwata,et al.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[46]  C. Crowell,et al.  Response deprivation and reinforcement in applied settings: A preliminary analysis. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[47]  B. L. Hopkins,et al.  The effects of access to a playroom on the rate and quality of printing and writing of first and second-grade students. , 1971, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[48]  E. Konarski.  Effects of response deprivation on the instrumental performance of mentally retarded persons. , 1987, American journal of mental deficiency.

[49]  J. E. Mazur.  The matching law and quantifications related to Premack's principle. , 1975 .

[50]  Peter Secretan.  Learning , 1965, Mental Health.

[51]  R. Gallimore,et al.  Contingency counseling by school personnel: an economical model of intervention. , 1970, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[52]  P. J. Krantz,et al.  The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[53]  M. Wolf,et al.  Good behavior game: effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[54]  N. Jacobson,et al.  Marital Therapy , 1986 .

[55]  B. Bucher,et al.  Identifying the educative and suppressive effects of positive practice and restitutional overcorrection. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[56]  Response deprivation and instrumental performance in the controlled-amount paradigm ☆ , 1975 .

[57]  H. Terrace,et al.  OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT " ERRORS " ' , 2005 .

[58]  J. Kavanau.  Compulsory Regime and Control of Environment in Animal Behavior I. Wheel-Running , 1963 .

[59]  K. Lattal.  Contingency management of toothbrushing behavior in a summer camp for children. , 1969, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[60]  Howard V. Smith,et al.  Some tests of molar models of instrumental performance. , 1987 .

[61]  R. Epstein,et al.  The positive side effects of reinforcement: a commentary on Balsam and Bondy (1983). , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[62]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Behavior Systems and Learning: From Misbehavior to General Principles , 2019, Contemporary Learning Theories.

[63]  Barbara Burkhard,et al.  The temporal triangle: Response substitution in instrumental conditioning , 1978 .

[64]  G A Lucas,et al.  Time horizons in rats foraging for food in temporally separated patches. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[65]  M. Kelley,et al.  Contingency contracting with disadvantaged youths: Improving classroom performance. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[66]  S. Klein,et al.  Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning , 2014 .

[67]  Schedule constraint on the average drink burst and the regulation of wheel running and drinking in rats. , 1986 .

[68]  A. L. Egel,et al.  Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children. , 1981, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[69]  C. Heth,et al.  Response deprivation and response satiation as determinants of instrumental performance: Some data and theory , 1978 .

[70]  T. Risley,et al.  A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment. , 1989, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[71]  A. E. Kazlxn,et al.  Behavior Modification in Applied Settings , 1975 .

[72]  W. Timberlake,et al.  Instrumental and contingent saccharin-licking in rats: Response deprivation and reinforcement , 1973 .