Cue utilization in a numerical prediction task.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Anderson. Chapter 8 – ALGEBRAIC MODELS IN PERCEPTION* , 1974 .
[2] A. Tversky,et al. On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .
[3] B. Brehmer. Cue utilization and cue consistency in multiple-cue probability learning☆ , 1972 .
[4] A. Tversky,et al. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .
[5] Paul Slovic,et al. Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .
[6] Berndt Brehmer,et al. The relation between cue dependency and cue validity in single-cue probability learning with scaled cue and criterion variables , 1970 .
[7] W. Ducharme. Response bias explanation of conservative human inference. , 1970 .
[8] James A. Wise,et al. Sample proportions and subjective probability revisions , 1970 .
[9] N. Anderson,et al. Comment on "an analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment". , 1969, Psychological bulletin.
[10] N. Anderson,et al. Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[11] P. Slovic,et al. An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.
[12] G. Pitz,et al. Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.
[13] L. Beach,et al. Man as an Intuitive Statistician , 2022 .
[14] J. C. Naylor,et al. Characteristics of the human inference process in complex choice behavior situations , 1966 .
[15] P Slovic,et al. Cue-consistency and cue-utilization in judgment. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.
[16] L. Tucker. A SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE FORMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENTS BY HURSCH, HAMMOND, AND HURSCH, AND BY HAMMOND, HURSCH, AND TODD. , 1964, Psychological review.
[17] K. R. Hammond,et al. SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY STUDIES. , 1964, Psychological review.