Cue utilization in a numerical prediction task.

Abstract : Forty subjects were trained to use scatter plots with regression lines to make numerical predictions of one variable (criterion) from another variable (cue). The subjects were trained on two separate cues, differing in validity. Later, the two cues were presented together, simultaneously for 20 subjects, successively for the rest. Subjects were asked to use both cues to predict the criterion. Instructions emphasized that the two cues were independent of one another, but did not specify how the two should be combined. Initial analyses indicated that a regression model provided an adequate fit to the data, that the subjects showed conservatism similar to the conservatism found in previous Bayesian inference studies. However, more molecular analyses indicated patterns of behavior which consistently deviated from the optimal model. The post hoc hypothesis that subjects were regressing each cue, then averaging the regressed values, was supported by the data for most subjects. Searching for heuristic strategies, rather than relying on the apparent fit of optimal models was advocated fur future research.

[1]  N. Anderson Chapter 8 – ALGEBRAIC MODELS IN PERCEPTION* , 1974 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[3]  B. Brehmer Cue utilization and cue consistency in multiple-cue probability learning☆ , 1972 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[5]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[6]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  The relation between cue dependency and cue validity in single-cue probability learning with scaled cue and criterion variables , 1970 .

[7]  W. Ducharme Response bias explanation of conservative human inference. , 1970 .

[8]  James A. Wise,et al.  Sample proportions and subjective probability revisions , 1970 .

[9]  N. Anderson,et al.  Comment on "an analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment". , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  N. Anderson,et al.  Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  P. Slovic,et al.  An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  G. Pitz,et al.  Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  L. Beach,et al.  Man as an Intuitive Statistician , 2022 .

[14]  J. C. Naylor,et al.  Characteristics of the human inference process in complex choice behavior situations , 1966 .

[15]  P Slovic,et al.  Cue-consistency and cue-utilization in judgment. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  L. Tucker A SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE FORMULATION IN THE DEVELOPMENTS BY HURSCH, HAMMOND, AND HURSCH, AND BY HAMMOND, HURSCH, AND TODD. , 1964, Psychological review.

[17]  K. R. Hammond,et al.  SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN MULTIPLE-CUE PROBABILITY STUDIES. , 1964, Psychological review.