An Integrated Approach for Enhancing the Quality of the Product by Combining Robust Design and Customer Requirements

Enhancing the quality of the product has always been one considerable concern of production process management, and this subject gave way to implementing so many methods including robust design. In this paper, robust design utilizes response surface methodology (RSM) considering the mean and variance of the response variable regarding system design, parameter design, and tolerance design. In this paper, customer requirements and robust design are regarded simultaneously to achieve enriched quality. Subsequently, with a non-linear programming, a novel method for integrating RSM and quality function deployment has been proposed to achieve robustness in design. The customer requirements are regarded in every stage of product development process meaning system design, parameter design and tolerance design. To validate the applicability of the proposed approach, it has been implemented in a real case of chemical industry. Research findings show that the proposed method is much better than other existing methods including MSE and dual response methods. According to this method, the resulted mean is better than MSE method, and more importantly, the variance of the process is approximately 14% and 10% lesser than dual response and MSE method. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Development of a highly efficient and resistant robust design , 2007 .

[2]  M. Bashiri,et al.  Optimization of probabilistic multiple response surfaces , 2012 .

[3]  André I. Khuri,et al.  Response surface methodology , 2010 .

[4]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Alternatives to the Taguchi Robust Parameter Design Approach , 1992 .

[5]  André I. Khuri,et al.  Response surface methodology: 1966–1988 , 1989 .

[6]  Eiji Nakamachi,et al.  Development of optimum process design system by numerical simulation , 1996 .

[7]  G. Box,et al.  On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions , 1951 .

[8]  William J. Hill,et al.  A Review of Response Surface Methodology: A Literature Survey* , 1966 .

[9]  Mahdi Bashiri,et al.  An Extension of Multi-Response Optimization in MADM View , 2009 .

[10]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Robust Parameter Design Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models , 2006 .

[11]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach , 2006 .

[12]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  A multivariate robust parameter design approach for optimization of AISI 52100 hardened steel turning with wiper mixed ceramic tool , 2012 .

[13]  Dennis K. J. Lin,et al.  Dual Response Surface Optimization: A Fuzzy Modeling Approach , 1998 .

[14]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Robust design modeling and optimization with unbalanced data , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  R Mead,et al.  A review of response surface methodology from a biometric viewpoint. , 1975, Biometrics.

[16]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Studies on a biobjective robust design optimization problem , 2009 .

[17]  Daniele Romano,et al.  Robust design via simulation experiments: a modified dual response surface approach , 2008, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[18]  X X S H E N,et al.  The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data , 2001 .

[19]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Development of a censored robust design model for time‐oriented quality characteristics , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[20]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Development of a sequential optimization procedure for robust design and tolerance design within a bi-objective paradigm , 2008 .

[21]  Li Lin,et al.  Methods for processing and prioritizing customer demands in variant product design , 2004 .

[22]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Bias-specified robust design optimization and its analytical solutions , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[23]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[24]  Byung Rae Cho,et al.  Integrating the Lambert W Function to a Tolerance Optimization Problem , 2005 .

[25]  L. Tang,et al.  A Unified Approach for Dual Response Surface Optimization , 2002 .

[26]  Semiha Kiziltas,et al.  Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry , 2005 .

[27]  Hao-Tien Liu,et al.  Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches , 2011 .

[28]  S. Chengzhi,et al.  Determining the optimum variable blank-holder forces using adaptive response surface methodology (ARSM) , 2005 .

[29]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .