A proportional control scheme for high density force myography

OBJECTIVE Force myography (FMG) has been shown to be a potentially higher accuracy alternative to electromyography for pattern recognition based prosthetic control. Classification accuracy, however, is just one factor that affects the usability of a control system. Others, like the ability to start and stop, to coordinate dynamic movements, and to control the velocity of the device through some proportional control scheme can be of equal importance. To impart effective fine control using FMG-based pattern recognition, it is important that a method of controlling the velocity of each motion be developed. METHODS In this work force myography data were collected from 14 able bodied participants and one amputee participant as they performed a set of wrist and hand motions. The offline proportional control performance of a standard mean signal amplitude approach and a proposed regression-based alternative was compared. The impact of providing feedback during training, as well as the use of constrained or unconstrained hand and wrist contractions, were also evaluated. RESULTS It is shown that the commonly used mean of rectified channel amplitudes approach commonly employed with electromyography does not translate to force myography. The proposed class-based regression proportional control approach is shown significantly outperform this standard approach (ρ  <  0.001), yielding a R2 correlation coefficients of 0.837 and 0.830 for constrained and unconstrained forearm contractions, respectively for able bodied participants. No significant difference (ρ  =  0.693) was found in R2 performance when feedback was provided during training or not. The amputee subject achieved a classification accuracy of 83.4%  ±  3.47% demonstrating the ability to distinguish contractions well with FMG. In proportional control the amputee participant achieved an R2 of of 0.375 for regression based proportional control during unconstrained contractions. This is lower than the unconstrained case for able-bodied subjects for this particular amputee, possibly due to difficultly in visualizing contraction level modulation without feedback. This may be remedied in the use of a prosthetic limb that would provide real-time feedback in the form of device speed. CONCLUSION A novel class-specific regression-based approach is proposed for multi-class control is described and shown to provide an effective means of providing FMG-based proportional control.

[1]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Support Vector Machine-Based Classification Scheme for Myoelectric Control Applied to Upper Limb , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  W Craelius,et al.  A biomimetic controller for a multifinger prosthesis. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Claudio Castellini,et al.  Using a high spatial resolution tactile sensor for intention detection , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[4]  Eric Fujiwara,et al.  Development of an optical fiber FMG sensor for the assessment of hand movements and forces , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM).

[5]  D Howard,et al.  Dimensional change in muscle as a control signal for powered upper limb prostheses: a pilot study. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Ann M. Simon,et al.  A comparison of proportional control methods for pattern recognition control , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Erik Scheme,et al.  High-density force myography: A possible alternative for upper-limb prosthetic control. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Force Myography to Control Robotic Upper Extremity Prostheses: A Feasibility Study , 2016, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[10]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Towards the development of a wearable feedback system for monitoring the activities of the upper-extremities , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  Sam L. Phillips,et al.  Residual kinetic imaging: a versatile interface for prosthetic control , 2005, Robotica.

[12]  K.B. Englehart,et al.  Multiple Binary Classifications via Linear Discriminant Analysis for Improved Controllability of a Powered Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Claudio Castellini,et al.  A wearable low-cost device based upon Force-Sensing Resistors to detect single-finger forces , 2014, 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[14]  Dennis C. Tkach,et al.  Study of stability of time-domain features for electromyographic pattern recognition , 2010, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  M. Ahmad,et al.  Clench force estimation by surface electromyography for neural prosthesis hand , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV).

[16]  K. Englehart,et al.  Classification of the myoelectric signal using time-frequency based representations. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  Carlo Menon,et al.  Continuous Prediction of Finger Movements Using Force Myography , 2016 .

[18]  Richard T. Johnson,et al.  Development of the Utah Artificial Arm , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Jie Liu,et al.  Feature dimensionality reduction for myoelectric pattern recognition: a comparison study of feature selection and feature projection methods. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[21]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Support Vector Regression for Improved Real-Time, Simultaneous Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Confidence-Based Rejection for Improved Pattern Recognition Myoelectric Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  T. Kuiken,et al.  EMG pattern recognition control of multifunctional prostheses by transradial amputees , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Nan Li,et al.  Hand motion recognition based on pressure distribution maps and LS-SVM , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Mechatronics and Control (ICMC).

[25]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Motion Normalized Proportional Control for Improved Pattern Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[26]  W. Craelius,et al.  Pressure signature of forearm as predictor of grip force. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  Gautam P. Sadarangani,et al.  Force Myography for Monitoring Grasping in Individuals with Stroke with Mild to Moderate Upper-Extremity Impairments: A Preliminary Investigation in a Controlled Environment , 2017, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol..

[28]  H. H. Sears,et al.  PROPORTIONAL MYOELECTRIC HAND CONTROL: AN EVALUATION , 1991, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.