Is it feasible to estimate radiosonde biases from interlaced measurements

Abstract. Upper-air measurements of essential climate variables (ECVs), such as temperature, are crucial for climate monitoring and climate change detection. Because of the internal variability of the climate system, many decades of measurements are typically required to robustly detect any trend in the climate data record. It is imperative for the records to be temporally homogeneous over many decades to confidently estimate any trend. Historically, records of upper-air measurements were primarily made for short-term weather forecasts and as such are seldom suitable for studying long-term climate change as they lack the required continuity and homogeneity. Recognizing this, the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN) has been established to provide reference-quality measurements of climate variables, such as temperature, pressure, and humidity, together with well-characterized and traceable estimates of the measurement uncertainty. To ensure that GRUAN data products are suitable to detect climate change, a scientifically robust instrument replacement strategy must always be adopted whenever there is a change in instrumentation. By fully characterizing any systematic differences between the old and new measurement system a temporally homogeneous data series can be created. One strategy is to operate both the old and new instruments in tandem for some overlap period to characterize any inter-instrument biases. However, this strategy can be prohibitively expensive at measurement sites operated by national weather services or research institutes. An alternative strategy that has been proposed is to alternate between the old and new instruments, so-called interlacing, and then statistically derive the systematic biases between the two instruments. Here we investigate the feasibility of such an approach specifically for radiosondes, i.e. flying the old and new instruments on alternating days. Synthetic data sets are used to explore the applicability of this statistical approach to radiosonde change management.

[1]  Ulrich Leiterer,et al.  Pressure and Temperature Differences between Vaisala RS80 and RS92 Radiosonde Systems , 2008 .

[2]  S. Sherwood,et al.  Radiosonde Daytime Biases and Late-20th Century Warming , 2005, Science.

[3]  Alan Y. Chiang,et al.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  Thomas C. Peterson,et al.  Tropospheric temperature trends: history of an ongoing controversy , 2011 .

[5]  Raisa Lehtinen,et al.  Comparison of Vaisala radiosondes RS41 and RS92 at the ARM Southern Great Plains site , 2015 .

[6]  S. Saito,et al.  Comparison of Meisei RS2-91 Rawinsondes and Vaisala RS92-SGP Radiosondes at Tateno for the Data Continuity for Climatic Data Analysis , 2012 .

[7]  D. Seidel,et al.  Measurement Requirements for Climate Monitoring of Upper-Air Temperature Derived from Reanalysis Data , 2006 .

[8]  Robert E. Eskridge,et al.  Use of Radiosonde Temperature Data in Climate Studies , 1998 .

[9]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[10]  Leopold Haimberger,et al.  Homogenization of the Global Radiosonde Temperature Dataset through Combined Comparison with Reanalysis Background Series and Neighboring Stations , 2012 .

[11]  H. Storch,et al.  Statistical Analysis in Climate Research , 2000 .

[12]  W. Briggs.  Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences , 2007 .

[13]  Craig S. Long,et al.  The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc , 2010 .

[14]  The GCOS Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN) , 2009 .

[15]  Fei Wu,et al.  Biases in Stratospheric and Tropospheric Temperature Trends Derived from Historical Radiosonde Data , 2006 .

[16]  Henning W. Rust,et al.  Fewer jumps, less memory: Homogenized temperature records and long memory , 2008 .

[17]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[18]  S. Wood.  Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R , 2006 .

[19]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[20]  J. Timmer,et al.  Tempting long-memory - on the interpretation of DFA results , 2004 .