Linguistic alignment between people and computers

[1]  A. Mulac,et al.  Lexical diversity and magnitude of convergent versus divergent style shifting-: Perceptual and evaluative consequences , 1988 .

[2]  Nigel Ward,et al.  Automatic User-Adaptive Speaking Rate Selection for Information Delivery , 2004 .

[3]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  Per Linell,et al.  Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives , 1998 .

[6]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[7]  J. Bavelas,et al.  "I show how you feel": Motor mimicry as a communicative act. , 1986 .

[8]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  A. Bell Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.

[10]  M. Pickering,et al.  Alignment in second language dialogue , 2008 .

[11]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  C. Fowler,et al.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[13]  Jennifer S. Pardo,et al.  On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. Paus,et al.  Modulation of Motor Excitability during Speech Perception: The Role of Broca's Area , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[17]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[18]  SUSAN E. BRENNAN,et al.  Conversation with and through computers , 1991, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[19]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[22]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[23]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[24]  R. J. Lickley,et al.  Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. , 1992 .

[25]  H. H. Clark,et al.  References in Conversation Between Experts and Novices , 1987 .

[26]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[29]  S. Gries Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[30]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[31]  M. F. Schober Spatial perspective-taking in conversation , 1993, Cognition.

[32]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  M. Pickering,et al.  The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .

[34]  R. Baaren,et al.  Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation , 2003 .

[35]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[36]  B. Danet,et al.  ’Baby’ or ’fetus’?: Language and the construction of reality in a manslaughter trial , 1980 .

[37]  Ass,et al.  Can computers be teammates? , 1996 .

[38]  M. Pickering,et al.  Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992 .

[40]  S. Brennan,et al.  When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions , 2003 .

[41]  S Oviatt,et al.  Linguistic Adaptations During Spoken and Multimodal Error Resolution , 1998, Language and speech.

[42]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Talking voices: Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk , 1987 .

[43]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[44]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[45]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry , 2003 .

[46]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Toward adaptive conversational interfaces: Modeling speech convergence with animated personas , 2004, TCHI.

[47]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Emotional Contagion , 1993 .

[48]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do Speakers Avoid Ambiguities During Dialogue? , 2005, Psychological science.

[49]  R. Gerrig,et al.  The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production , 2005, Cognition.

[50]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Syntactic alignment between computers and people: The role of belief about mental states , 2003 .

[51]  Richard E. Maurer,et al.  Effect of Postural Congruence on Client's Perception of Counselor Empathy. , 1983 .

[52]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001 .

[53]  Richard E. Maurer Effect of Postural Congruence on Client ' s Perception of Counselor Empathy , 2005 .

[54]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Development of Dialogue Co-ordination Skills in Schoolchildren. , 1993 .

[55]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages , 2004 .

[56]  C. Nass,et al.  How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .

[57]  H. Giles,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics , 2010 .

[58]  M. Pickering,et al.  Alignment of reference frames in dialogue , 2004 .

[59]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996 .

[60]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  Stephanie Kelter,et al.  Surface form and memory in question answering , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[62]  C. Nass,et al.  Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .

[63]  Yasuhiro Katagiri,et al.  Prosodic alignment in human–computer interaction , 2007, Connect. Sci..

[64]  H. Giles,et al.  Speech style and social evaluation , 1975 .

[65]  Heather Bortfeld,et al.  Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non‐native speakers , 1997 .

[66]  Susan E. Brennan,et al.  LEXICAL ENTRAINMENT IN SPONTANEOUS DIALOG , 1996 .

[67]  Bucciarelli,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[68]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction , 2003 .

[69]  Jiang Hu,et al.  Adaptive language behavior in HCI: how expectations and beliefs about a system affect users' word choice , 2006, CHI.

[70]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[71]  M. Pickering,et al.  Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. , 2002 .

[72]  G. Dell,et al.  Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.