Linguistic alignment between people and computers
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Mulac,et al. Lexical diversity and magnitude of convergent versus divergent style shifting-: Perceptual and evaluative consequences , 1988 .
[2] Nigel Ward,et al. Automatic User-Adaptive Speaking Rate Selection for Information Delivery , 2004 .
[3] B. J. Fogg,et al. Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[4] G. Rizzolatti,et al. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: a TMS study , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.
[5] Per Linell,et al. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives , 1998 .
[6] Alexandra A. Cleland,et al. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.
[7] J. Bavelas,et al. "I show how you feel": Motor mimicry as a communicative act. , 1986 .
[8] M. Pickering,et al. Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.
[9] A. Bell. Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.
[10] M. Pickering,et al. Alignment in second language dialogue , 2008 .
[11] A. van Knippenberg,et al. Mimicry and Prosocial Behavior , 2004, Psychological science.
[12] C. Fowler,et al. Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.
[13] Jennifer S. Pardo,et al. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] T. Paus,et al. Modulation of Motor Excitability during Speech Perception: The Role of Broca's Area , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[15] R. Schvaneveldt,et al. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.
[16] Alexandra A. Cleland,et al. The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .
[17] S. Goldinger. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.
[18] SUSAN E. BRENNAN,et al. Conversation with and through computers , 1991, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.
[19] M. Pickering,et al. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[20] Holly P Branigan,et al. Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[21] B. Keysar,et al. When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.
[22] T. Chartrand,et al. Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.
[23] J. Bailenson,et al. Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.
[24] R. J. Lickley,et al. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. , 1992 .
[25] H. H. Clark,et al. References in Conversation Between Experts and Novices , 1987 .
[26] H. H. Clark,et al. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] B. J. Fogg,et al. Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[28] C. Nass,et al. Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .
[29] S. Gries. Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[30] A. Gouldner. THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .
[31] M. F. Schober. Spatial perspective-taking in conversation , 1993, Cognition.
[32] T. Chartrand,et al. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[33] M. Pickering,et al. The Representation of Verbs: Evidence from Syntactic Priming in Language Production , 1998 .
[34] R. Baaren,et al. Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation , 2003 .
[35] S. Garrod,et al. Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.
[36] B. Danet,et al. ’Baby’ or ’fetus’?: Language and the construction of reality in a manslaughter trial , 1980 .
[37] Ass,et al. Can computers be teammates? , 1996 .
[38] M. Pickering,et al. Structural priming: a critical review. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.
[39] Susan R. Fussell,et al. Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992 .
[40] S. Brennan,et al. When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions , 2003 .
[41] S Oviatt,et al. Linguistic Adaptations During Spoken and Multimodal Error Resolution , 1998, Language and speech.
[42] Deborah Tannen,et al. Talking voices: Repetition in conversation: toward a poetics of talk , 1987 .
[43] H. Giles,et al. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .
[44] C. Nass,et al. Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[45] T. Chartrand,et al. The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry , 2003 .
[46] Sharon L. Oviatt,et al. Toward adaptive conversational interfaces: Modeling speech convergence with animated personas , 2004, TCHI.
[47] J. Cacioppo,et al. Emotional Contagion , 1993 .
[48] M. Pickering,et al. Do Speakers Avoid Ambiguities During Dialogue? , 2005, Psychological science.
[49] R. Gerrig,et al. The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production , 2005, Cognition.
[50] Clifford Nass,et al. Syntactic alignment between computers and people: The role of belief about mental states , 2003 .
[51] Richard E. Maurer,et al. Effect of Postural Congruence on Client's Perception of Counselor Empathy. , 1983 .
[52] C. Nass,et al. Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001 .
[53] Richard E. Maurer. Effect of Postural Congruence on Client ' s Perception of Counselor Empathy , 2005 .
[54] S. Garrod,et al. The Development of Dialogue Co-ordination Skills in Schoolchildren. , 1993 .
[55] Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al. Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages , 2004 .
[56] C. Nass,et al. How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .
[57] H. Giles,et al. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics , 2010 .
[58] M. Pickering,et al. Alignment of reference frames in dialogue , 2004 .
[59] H. H. Clark,et al. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996 .
[60] Susan R. Fussell,et al. Coordination of knowledge in communication: effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[61] Stephanie Kelter,et al. Surface form and memory in question answering , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[62] C. Nass,et al. Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1 , 1999 .
[63] Yasuhiro Katagiri,et al. Prosodic alignment in human–computer interaction , 2007, Connect. Sci..
[64] H. Giles,et al. Speech style and social evaluation , 1975 .
[65] Heather Bortfeld,et al. Use and acquisition of idiomatic expressions in referring by native and non‐native speakers , 1997 .
[66] Susan E. Brennan,et al. LEXICAL ENTRAINMENT IN SPONTANEOUS DIALOG , 1996 .
[67] Bucciarelli,et al. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .
[68] Mattias Heldner,et al. Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction , 2003 .
[69] Jiang Hu,et al. Adaptive language behavior in HCI: how expectations and beliefs about a system affect users' word choice , 2006, CHI.
[70] Clifford Nass,et al. The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .
[71] M. Pickering,et al. Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. , 2002 .
[72] G. Dell,et al. Becoming syntactic. , 2006, Psychological review.