Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: perceptible progress.

PURPOSE All cooperative group studies performed in North America for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were evaluated to determine the pattern of the clinical trials and the outcome of patients over the past 20 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS Phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage SCLC were identified through a search of the National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program database from 1972 to 1993. Patients with extensive-stage SCLC treated during a similar time interval listed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were also examined. Trends were tested in the number of trials over time, the number and sex of patients entered onto the trials, and the survival time of patients treated over time. RESULTS Twenty-one phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage SCLC were initiated between 1972 and 1990. The median of the median survival times of patients treated on the control arms of the phase III trials initiated between 1972 and 1981 was 7.0 months; for those patients enrolled onto control arms between 1982 and 1990, the median survival time was 8.9 months (P =.001). Analysis of the SEER database of patients with extensive-stage SCLC over the same time period shows a similar 2-month prolongation in median survival time. CONCLUSION Analysis of 21 phase III trials initiated in North America and the SEER database from 1972 to 1994 demonstrates that there has been a modest improvement in the survival time of patients with extensive-stage SCLC.

[1]  K. Kelly,et al.  New chemotherapeutic agents prolong survival and improve quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the literature and future directions. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  P. Okunieff,et al.  Outcome of patients with small-cell lung cancer during 20 years of clinical research at the US National Cancer Institute. , 1997, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[3]  R. Simon,et al.  18 The use of a statistical model to help predict the outcome of phase III trials of patients (pts) with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) , 1997 .

[4]  J. Minna,et al.  Chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer , 1995, BMJ.

[5]  O. Brodin,et al.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials , 1995 .

[6]  L. Einhorn,et al.  Cisplatin plus etoposide with and without ifosfamide in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group study. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  J. Herndon,et al.  Schedule dependency of 21-day oral versus 3-day intravenous etoposide in combination with intravenous cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  R. Souhami,et al.  Assessment of 'quality of life' using a daily diary card in a randomised trial of chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. , 1995, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  J. Aisner Extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: the thrill of victory; the agony of defeat. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  D. Ihde,et al.  Chemotherapy of Lung Cancer , 1992 .

[11]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Justification for evaluating new anticancer drugs in selected untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  J. Crawford,et al.  Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  H. Earl,et al.  A randomised trial of planned versus as required chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer: a Cancer Research Campaign trial. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  K. Suemasu,et al.  Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus cisplatin and etoposide versus alternation of these regimens in small-cell lung cancer. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  J. Crowley,et al.  Determinants of improved outcome in small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of the 2,580-patient Southwest Oncology Group data base. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  D. Ettinger,et al.  A randomized comparison of standard chemotherapy versus alternating chemotherapy and maintenance versus no maintenance therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase III study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  K. Propert,et al.  A randomized trial of anticoagulation with warfarin and of alternating chemotherapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  J. O'fallon,et al.  Alternating Chemotherapy With or Without VP‐16 in Extensive‐Stage Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 1989, American journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  W. Hong,et al.  Etoposide combined with cyclophosphamide plus vincristine compared with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide plus vincristine and with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus vincristine in the treatment of small-cell carcinoma of the lung: a randomized trial of the Bristol Lung Cancer Study Group. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  D. Spiegelman,et al.  Prognostic factors in small-cell carcinoma of the lung: an analysis of 1,521 patients. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  L. Case,et al.  Improvement of long-term survival in extensive small-cell lung cancer. , 1988, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Perez,et al.  A randomized comparison of high-dose versus conventional-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  D. Osoba,et al.  Superiority of alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 1987, Annals of internal medicine.

[24]  C. Coltman,et al.  Combined alkylators and multiple-site irradiation for extensive small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. , 1986, Cancer treatment reports.

[25]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  D. Gandara,et al.  Chemotherapy of small-cell carcinoma of lung: a randomized comparison of alternating and sequential combination chemotherapy programs. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  R. Livingston,et al.  Combined modality treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 1984, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Phase III study of CCNU, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and VP‐16 in small‐cell carcinoma of the lung , 1982, Cancer.

[29]  R. Livingston,et al.  Combination chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and BCG immunotherapy in extensive (metastatic) small cell carcinoma of the lung. A southwest oncology group study , 1980, Cancer.

[30]  A. Bartolucci,et al.  The superiority of combination chemotherapy over single agent chemotherapy in small cell lung carcinoma , 1979, Cancer.

[31]  E. Shaw,et al.  Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cisplatin and etoposide plus megestrol acetate/placebo in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  J. Earle,et al.  Sequencing and schedule effects of cisplatin plus etoposide in small-cell lung cancer: results of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group randomized clinical trial. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  T. Pajak,et al.  A randomized combined modality trial in small cell carcinoma of the lung comparison of combination chemotherapy‐radiation therapy versus cyclophosphamide‐radiation therapy effects of maintenance chemotherapy and prophylactic whole brain irradiation , 1980, Cancer.