Full suppression of viral load is needed to achieve an optimal CD4 cell count response among patients on triple drug antiretroviral therapy

ObjectiveTo characterize the relationship between plasma viral load (pVL) suppression and triple drug antiretroviral therapy, and the accompanying changes in CD4 cell counts. MethodRetrospective study of 465 participants in a HIV/AIDS Treatment Program who initiated triple drug therapy between August 1996 and May 1998. Participants were divided into three groups according to their pVL response: (i) non-responders (NR; n = 112) exhibited pVL persistently > 500 copies/ml over the study period; (ii) partial responders (PR; n = 100) achieved a pVL < 100 copies/ml at least once and subsequently rebounded to > 500 copies/ml; and (iii) full responders (FR; n = 253) achieved a pVL < 500 copies/ml and sustained this level for the remainder of the study period. For each group, the accompanying changes in absolute and fractional CD4 cell counts were evaluated. ResultsThe median net change in pVL per person from baseline to the end of the observation period was −0.37, −2.27, and −2.56 log10 copies/ml for NR, PR and FR, respectively. During weeks 68–83, the median CD4 cell count (× 106 cells/l) was 150 [interquartile range (IQR) 90–370], 380 (IQR 300–480) and 525 (IQR 305–705) for NR, PR and FR, respectively. Median changes in CD4 cells (× 106 cells/l) were −20 (IQR −90 to 40), 150 (IQR 30–250) and 240 (IQR 110–365) for NR, PR, and FR, respectively. The net percentage change in CD4 cells per person was 0% (IQR -34–31), 54% (IQR 6–160), and 83% (IQR 39–173) for NR, PR, and FR, respectively. By weeks 68–83, the median fractional CD4 cells was 0.16 (IQR 0.07–0.22), 0.22 (IQR 0.15–0.28), and 0.26 (IQR 0.17–0.34) for NR, PR and FR respectively. ConclusionsAn optimal CD4 cell count response appears to be coupled with continued pVL suppression. Our data indicate that maximal suppression of viral replication should remain the primary goal of therapy.

[1]  R. Grant,et al.  Sustained CD4+ T cell response after virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based regimens in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. , 2000, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  R. Hogg,et al.  Antiretroviral treatment in 1998 , 1998, The Lancet.

[3]  P. Bonfanti,et al.  Virological treatment failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy in an unselected cohort of HIV-infected patients. , 1998, AIDS.

[4]  S. Levitz Improvement in CD4+ cell counts despite persistently detectable HIV load. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Amalio Telenti,et al.  CD4-cell count in HIV-1-infected individuals remaining viraemic with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  B. Yip,et al.  Antiviral effect of double and triple drug combinations amongst HIV‐infected adults: lessons from the implementation of viral load‐driven antiretroviral therapy , 1998, AIDS.

[7]  R. Hogg,et al.  Improved survival among HIV-infected individuals following initiation of antiretroviral therapy. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  J. Rockstroh,et al.  Reply: Virological treatment failure of protease inhibitor therapy in an unselected cohort of HIV-infected patients. , 1997, AIDS.

[9]  M. Gil Fortuño,et al.  [Antiretroviral treatment]. , 1998, Medicina clinica.

[10]  B. Yip,et al.  Decline in deaths from AIDS due to new antiretrovirals , 1997, The Lancet.

[11]  R. Hogg,et al.  Emerging international consensus for use of antiretroviral therapy , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  Douglas D. Richman,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996 : Recommendations of an international panel , 1996 .

[13]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1996. Recommendations of an international panel. International AIDS Society-USA. , 1996, JAMA.