Bridging Cognitive Models and Recommender Systems

Intelligent systems must be designed to interact with human beings. Hence, ideal systems for interacting with people would be those capable of interpreting their environment cognitively, that is, similarly to how people do it. This special issue proposed a space for researchers to discuss the issues and advantages of bridging different fields for the study of cognitive approaches for recommendation [1–4], and for the development of recommender systems shaping cognitive architectures [5, 6]. In recent conferences and meetings [7, 8], we realized that the link between these fields has not received sufficient attention. In our opinion, recommendations should also be designed and evaluated considering cognitive factors. The level of cognitive reasoning in a system or the number of creative solutions that a system can provide can be considered as a measure to evaluate the intelligence of that system [9, 10]. This issue is closely related with key trends for emerging technologies such as cognitive expert advisors, machine learning or smart robots. This bridge should be travelled in both sides. From one side, cognition represents an ideal model to link different disciplines, such as robotics, interaction studies, decision support systems and information retrieval. Cognitive architectures are providing recommendations to agents (a human or a robot) in order to interact with the environment (perceived environment or collected data). Furthermore, by getting assessment from collaborative human expertise, expert recommender systems can automate procedures and tasks in a cognitive way, for physical agents, like robots or soft agents to collect information from databases or Internet. Hence, topics covered by this special issue are related with cognitive approaches to data decision-making that are context-aware and employ reasoning in several application domains [11]. In this special issue, four papers have been selected out of all the received submissions. These proposals are briefly summarized as follows. The paper “Perceptions or Actions? Grounding How Agents Interact Within a Software Architecture for Cognitive Robotics” by R. Marfil, A. Romero-Garces, J. P. Bandera, L. J. Manso, L. V. Calderita, P. Bustos, A. Bandera, J. Garcia-Polo, F. Fernandez and D. Voilmy proposes to join the perceptual and acting perspectives in cognitive robotics via a unique representation where the responses of all software modules in the architecture are generalized using the same set of tokens. In this form, the cognitive architecture establishes a close coupling between deliberative and reactive control flows, and robots can react properly upon encountering unexpected changes in their environment that are not part of their planned course of actions. In the paper “Doctor Recommendation Based on an Intuitionistic Normal Cloud Model Considering Patient Preferences” by Y. Yang, J. Hu, Y. Liu and X. Chen, Chinese medical websites helping patients search for satisfactory doctors via the Internet regardless of time and location are considered. Authors propose a systematic decision support model to improve standard recommendations using intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) with the Bonferroni mean (BM) to address interdependencies. The obtained system accommodates patient preferences using multiple intuitionistic normal clouds (INCs). A case study is provided using production data from haodf.com, the largest Chinese medical website. The paper “Creating, Interpreting and Rating Harmonic Colour Palettes Using a Cognitively Inspired Model” by L.Museros, I. Sanz, Z. Falomir and L. Gonzalez-Abril introduces a cognitively inspired qualitative theory, QCharm, which defines five operators for colour combination based on the qualitative colour descriptor (QCD) and applies these * Cecilio Angulo cecilio.angulo@upc.edu

[1]  Quan Pan,et al.  Learning binary codes with neural collaborative filtering for efficient recommendation systems , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[2]  Núria Agell,et al.  A transformational creativity tool to support chocolate designers , 2015, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Fuzzy decision-making and consensus: New trends and real-life applications , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[4]  Cecilio Angulo,et al.  Using a cognitive architecture for general purpose service robot control , 2015, Connect. Sci..

[5]  Luis González Abril,et al.  Obtaining Discriminative Colour Names According to the Context: Using a Fuzzy Colour Model and Probabilistic Reference Grounding , 2019, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Zoe Falomir Towards Cognitive Image Interpretation - Qualitative Descriptors, Domain Knowledge and Narrative Generation , 2013, CCIA.

[7]  Cecilio Angulo,et al.  Completing Ambiguous Plans in Cognitive Robotics with Delayed Information , 2016, CCIA.

[8]  Zoe Falomir,et al.  Object replacement and object composition in a creative cognitive system. Towards a computational solver of the Alternative Uses Test , 2016, Cognitive Systems Research.

[9]  Zoe Falomir,et al.  Special issue on problem-solving, creativity and spatial reasoning , 2019, Cognitive Systems Research.

[10]  Zoe Falomir,et al.  Artificial Cognitive Systems That Can Answer Human Creativity Tests: An Approach and Two Case Studies , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[11]  Zoe Falomir,et al.  The logical style painting classifier based on Horn clauses and explanations (ℓ-SHE) , 2019, Log. J. IGPL.