Approach to Model Interest for a Planetary Rover through Dezert-Smarandache Theory

In this paper, we propose an approach for assigning an interest level to the goals of a planetary rover. Assigning an interest level to goals allows the rover autonomously to transform and reallocate the goals. The interest level is defined by data-fusing payload and navigation information. The fusion yields an “interest map” that quantifies the level of interest of each area around the rover. In this way the planner can choose the most interesting scientific objectives to be analyzed, with limited human intervention, and reallocates its goals autonomously. The Dezert–Smarandache Theory of Plausible and Paradoxical Reasoning was used for information fusion: this theory allows dealing with vague and conflicting data. In particular, it allows us directly to model the behavior of the scientists that have to evaluate the relevance of a particular set of goals. The paper shows an application of the proposed approach to the generation of a reliable interest map.

[1]  Florentin Smarandache,et al.  On the generation of hyper-powersets for the DSmT , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[2]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  WISDOM: An Advanced Intelligent, Fault-Tolerant System for Autonomy in Risky Environments , 2006 .

[3]  Albena Tchamova,et al.  Estimation of target behavior tendencies using dezert-smarandache theory , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[4]  Jorge L. Vago,et al.  The Mars exploration plans of ESA , 2006, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  L. Hubert-Moy,et al.  Land cover change prediction with a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[6]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[7]  Lucien Wald,et al.  Some terms of reference in data fusion , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Artificial curiosity based on discovering novel algorithmic predictability through coevolution , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[9]  Mauro Massari,et al.  A non-deterministic planner for planetary rover autonomy , 2006 .

[10]  Jean Dezert,et al.  Foundations for a new theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning , 2002 .

[11]  Steve Hanks,et al.  Optimal Planning with a Goal-directed Utility Model , 1994, AIPS.

[12]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A complete navigation system for goal acquisition in unknown environments , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[13]  Manuela Veloso,et al.  Goal Transformations in Continuous Planning , 1998 .

[14]  Eugene Fink,et al.  Integrating planning and learning: the PRODIGY architecture , 1995, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..