Human cognitive and perceptual factors in JDL level 4 hard/soft data fusion

Utilization of human participants as "soft sensors" is becoming increasingly important for gathering information related to a wide range of phenomena including natural and man-made disasters, environmental changes over time, crime prevention, and other roles of the "citizen scientist." The ubiquity of advanced mobile devices is facilitating the role of humans as "hybrid sensor platforms", allowing them to gather data (e.g. video, still images, GPS coordinates), annotate it based on their intuitive human understanding, and upload it using existing infrastructure and social networks. However, this new paradigm presents many challenges related to source characterization, effective tasking, and utilization of massive quantities of physical sensor, human-based, and hybrid hard/soft data in a manner that facilitates decision making instead of simply amplifying information overload. In the Joint Directors of Laboratories (JDL) data fusion process model, "level 4" fusion is a meta-process that attempts to improve performance of the entire fusion system through effective source utilization. While there are well-defined approaches for tasking and categorizing physical sensors, these methods fall short when attempting to effectively utilize a hybrid group of physical sensors and human observers. While physical sensor characterization can rely on statistical models of performance (e.g. accuracy, reliability, specificity, etc.) under given conditions, "soft" sensors add the additional challenges of characterizing human performance, tasking without inducing bias, and effectively balancing strengths and weaknesses of both human and physical sensors. This paper addresses the challenges of the evolving human-centric fusion paradigm and presents cognitive, perceptual, and other human factors that help to understand, categorize, and augment the roles and capabilities of humans as observers in hybrid systems.

[1]  E. Paulos,et al.  RE: REempower and REcycle , 2007 .

[2]  David L. Hall,et al.  A multi-agent infrastructure for hard and soft information fusion , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Fareena Sultan,et al.  Tuning in and tuning out: media multitasking among young consumers , 2010 .

[4]  Daniel J. Simons,et al.  Current Approaches to Change Blindness , 2000 .

[5]  David L. Hall,et al.  Human-Centered Information Fusion: Artech House Electronic Warfare Library , 2010 .

[6]  Christoph Stasch,et al.  New Generation Sensor Web Enablement , 2011, Sensors.

[7]  P. Viviani,et al.  The effect of movement velocity on form perception: Geometric illusions in dynamic displays , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Ann M. Bisantz,et al.  Human Engineering Factors in Distributed and Net-Centric Fusion Systems , 2012 .

[9]  Mark H. Hansen,et al.  Urban sensing: out of the woods , 2008, CACM.

[10]  Ronald A. Rensink Change detection. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  David Whitaker,et al.  Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[12]  Jeffrey C. Rimland Service-Oriented Architecture for Human-Centric Information Fusion , 2012 .

[13]  Leonid I. Perlovsky,et al.  Cognitive high level information fusion , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[14]  James T. Enns,et al.  Visualizing real-time multivariate data using preattentive processing , 1995, TOMC.

[15]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science , 2003 .

[16]  James Llinas,et al.  A framework for dynamic hard/soft fusion , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[18]  S. Werner,et al.  Is "Change Blindness" Attenuated by Domain-specific Expertise? An Expert-Novices Comparison of Change Detection in Football Images , 2000 .

[19]  Ann M. Bisantz,et al.  Towards context-aware hard/soft information fusion: Incorporating situationally qualified human observations into a fusion process for intelligence analysis , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[20]  R. Becklen,et al.  Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events , 1983 .

[21]  Moshe Kam,et al.  Evidence combination for hard and soft sensor data fusion , 2011, 14th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[22]  David L. Hall,et al.  Test and evaluation of soft/hard information fusion systems: A test environment, methodology and initial data sets , 2010, 2010 13th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[23]  A. Møller Sensory systems : anatomy and physiology , 2003 .

[24]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  James T. Enns,et al.  Attention and Visual Memory in Visualization and Computer Graphics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[27]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Actionable Cultural Understanding for Support to Tactical Operations (ACUSTO): Toward a New Methodological Template for Spatial Decision Support System , 2009 .

[28]  I. Gilchrist,et al.  Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search , 2006 .

[29]  Leysia Palen,et al.  "Voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis , 2011, CHI.

[30]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking , 2003 .