Shifting from an audience to an active public in social viewing: Focusing on the discussion network

Abstract The use of online media to talk with co-viewers while watching television, is dramatically increasing. The current study assesses the relationship between social viewing and cognitive elaboration of television content, particularly focusing on the discussion network (social capital and cross-cutting talk) with co-viewers. Results from an online survey among South Koreans ( N  = 500) suggest that the amount of social viewing does not directly increase cognitive elaboration; but bridging social capital mediates the relationship. As predicted, a positive relationship was shown between social viewing and cross-cutting talk (i.e., talking with others who have opposing opinions), and moreover, cross-cutting talk mediated the relationship between social viewing and cognitive elaboration. This study is expected to open the gateway for discussions on social viewing in the context of the discussion network.

[1]  J. Carey.  Communication as culture: Essays on media and society , 1989 .

[2]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[4]  D. Dayan.  Mothers, midwives and abortionists: genealogy, obstetrics, audiences and piblics , 2005 .

[5]  Christopher Buschow,et al.  Tweeting television: Exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV , 2014 .

[6]  S. Livingstone.  Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere , 2005 .

[7]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[8]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  Watching Television Without Pity , 2008 .

[9]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement? , 2009 .

[10]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[11]  Pablo Barberá.  How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization . Evidence from Germany , Spain , and the U . S . , 2014 .

[12]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion , 1995 .

[13]  Jennifer Brundidge.  Encountering "Difference" in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks , 2010 .

[14]  R. Putnam.  Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[15]  Nick Geidner,et al.  Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed From Something Blue: Experiments on Dual Viewing TV and Twitter , 2014 .

[16]  Jason Martin,et al.  Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Elizabeth L. Cohen,et al.  Individual Differences in In-Person and Social Media Television Coviewing: The Role of Emotional Contagion, Need to Belong, and Coviewing Orientation , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  M. Defleur,et al.  Theories of mass communication , 1968 .

[19]  J. Habermas.  The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere , 1962 .

[20]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[21]  Greg Elmer,et al.  Live research: Twittering an election debate , 2013, New Media Soc..

[22]  M. Winn.  Plug-in Drug: Television, Computers, and Family Life , 2002 .

[23]  N. Anstead,et al.  The Emerging Viewertariat and BBC Question Time , 2011 .

[24]  J. Horrigan.  Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties , 2001 .

[25]  Sha Yang,et al.  Modeling the Intrahousehold Behavioral Interaction , 2010 .

[26]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How "social" is Social TV? The influence of social motives and expected outcomes on the usage of Social TV applications , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Michael Rich,et al.  Is television viewing associated with social isolation? Roles of exposure time, viewing context, and violent content. , 2006, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[28]  L CohenElizabeth,et al.  Individual Differences in In-Person and Social Media Television Coviewing: The Role of Emotional Contagion, Need to Belong, and Coviewing Orientation , 2014 .

[29]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[30]  Z. Wang,et al.  Co-Viewing Effects of Ethnic-Oriented Programming , 2015 .

[31]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign , 2012, New Media Soc..

[32]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Democracy Based on Difference: Examining the Links Between Structural Heterogeneity, Heterogeneity of Discussion Networks, and Democratic Citizenship , 2006 .

[33]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[34]  BarabasJason.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. , 2015 .

[35]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[37]  Paul Coulton,et al.  Sharing the viewing experience through second screens , 2012, EuroITV.

[38]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits , 2013 .

[39]  Donatella Selva.  Social Television , 2016 .

[40]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[41]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[42]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks , 2005 .

[43]  Harvey Sacks,et al.  Lectures on Conversation , 1995 .

[44]  Axel Bruns,et al.  TWITTER AS A TECHNOLOGY FOR AUDIENCING AND FANDOM , 2013 .

[45]  Katherine Cramer Walsh,et al.  Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life , 2003 .

[46]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Understanding Deliberation , 1999 .

[47]  Konstantinos Chorianopoulos,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Human-computer Interaction Introduction to Social Tv: Enhancing the Shared Experience with Interactive Tv Introduction to Social Tv: Enhancing the Shared Experience with Interactive Tv Introduction to Social Tv Chorianopoulos and Lekakos , 2022 .

[48]  Joon Soo Lim,et al.  The impact of engagement motives for social TV on social presence and sports channel commitment , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[49]  Lora Oehlberg,et al.  Social TV: Designing for Distributed, Sociable Television Viewing , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[50]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[51]  A. Ruddock.  Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method , 2000 .

[52]  E. J. Paavonen,et al.  Do parental co-viewing and discussions mitigate TV-induced fears in young children? , 2009, Child: care, health and development.

[53]  Y Kano,et al.  Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  Brandon Van Der Heide,et al.  Social Media as Information Source: Recency of Updates and Credibility of Information , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[55]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Adoption of the Semantic Web for overcoming technical limitations of knowledge management systems , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  Matthew Barnidge,et al.  Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings , 2017 .

[57]  Sejung Marina Choi,et al.  Motivations and Social Relationships: A Comparative Study of Social Network Sites in the U.S. and Korea , 2008 .

[58]  Todd Graham.  Beyond “Political” Communicative Spaces: Talking Politics on the Wife Swap Discussion Forum , 2012 .

[59]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  Co-viewing live TV with digital backchannel streams , 2011, EuroITV '11.

[60]  Jean-Baptiste Harguindéguy,et al.  Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring participatory culture , 2015 .

[61]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[62]  Aaron Smith and Jan Lauren Boyles.  The Rise of the “Connected Viewer” , 2012 .

[63]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse , 2006, The Journal of Politics.

[64]  Sanna Malinen.  "Unsociability" as Boundary Regulation on Social Network Sites , 2015, ECIS.

[65]  R. Kline.  Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research. , 2010 .

[66]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media, and Citizen Engagement , 2015 .

[67]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[68]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Defining sociability and social presence in Social TV , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[69]  J. Lull.  THE SOCIAL USES OF TELEVISION , 1980 .

[70]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[71]  Matthias Hofer,et al.  Perceived bridging and bonding social capital on Twitter: Differentiating between followers and followees , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[72]  E. Rogers,et al.  Research methods and the new media , 1988 .

[73]  Diana C. Mutz.  The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation , 2002 .

[74]  Nicholas A. John,et al.  “I Don't like You Any More”: Facebook Unfriending by Israelis during the Israel–Gaza Conflict of 2014 , 2015 .

[75]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Watching together: integrating text chat with video , 2007, CHI.

[76]  Pablo César,et al.  Past, present, and future of social TV: A categorization , 2011, 2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC).

[77]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[78]  谷藤 悦史,et al.  Theories of Mass Communication,5th edition/Melvin L.Defleur,Sandora Ball-Rokeach(1989) , 1992 .

[79]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  Who is on your sofa?: TV audience communities and second screening social networks , 2012, EuroITV.

[80]  B. Byrne.  Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[81]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization , 2014 .

[82]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[83]  M. R. Levy,et al.  AUDIENCE ACTIVITY AND GRATIFICATIONS , 1984 .

[84]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[85]  Jason M. Simmons,et al.  Understanding Professional Athletes' Use of Twitter: A Content Analysis of Athlete Tweets , 2010 .

[86]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[87]  Matthew Barnidge,et al.  The role of news in promoting political disagreement on social media , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[88]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[89]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[90]  Michele Sorice.  Sociologia dei mass media , 2009 .

[91]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[92]  E. Perse.  Involvement with Local Television News Cognitive and Emotional Dimensions , 1990 .