Exploring the Role of Infographics for Summarizing Medical Literature

Abstract Purpose To investigate differences in (1) reader preference, (2) cognitive load during summary review, and (3) delayed information retention between infographic article summaries and traditional text-only research abstracts. Methods The three study outcomes were assessed using a two-phase within-subjects experiment. In phase 1, participants rated cognitive load as the mental effort they invested in reviewing eight article summaries (four in infographic format and four in text-only abstract format) on the 9-point Paas scale (1=low mental effort, 9=high mental effort) and indicated their preferred summary format on a 9-point preference scale (1=preferred infographics, 9=preferred text-only abstracts). Four weeks later, phase-2 tested delayed information retention via two free-recall and two cued-recall questions per article. Results Participants preferred infographic summaries to traditional text-only research abstract summaries as evidenced by a mean format preference score (mean±standard deviation) of 3.97±2.48 ( t (71)=13.6, p =0.01) which was significantly more positive than the neutral score of 5 on the 9 point preference scale. Mean mental effort during summary review was lower for infographics (4.30±1.34) than for text-only abstracts (5.06±1.35, t (70)=4.41, p =0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in delayed information retention. Discussion This study suggests that infographics could play a role in summarizing medical research literature. While no difference was found in delayed information retention, infographics were associated with higher reader preference and lower cognitive load during summary review. Further research should clarify the practical implications of these findings.

[1]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving college students’ evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  M. Fischer,et al.  The use of Facebook in medical education – A literature review , 2014, GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung.

[3]  D L Sackett,et al.  Evidence-based medicine. , 1997, Seminars in perinatology.

[4]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 1st Edition , 2005 .

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? , 1973 .

[6]  John Greco,et al.  Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism , 2013 .

[7]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[8]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Terry Kind,et al.  Twelve tips for using social media as a medical educator , 2014, Medical teacher.

[10]  B. Druss,et al.  Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[11]  Brent Thoma,et al.  CJEM and the changing landscape of medical education and knowledge translation. , 2015, CJEM.

[12]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education , 2006, BMC medical education.

[13]  Irene W. Y. Ma,et al.  Feasibility of scenario-based simulation training versus traditional workshops in continuing medical education: a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Medical education online.

[14]  Lynsey J. Martin,et al.  The impact of social media promotion with infographics and podcasts on research dissemination and readership. , 2018, CJEM.

[15]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[16]  J. Wanderer,et al.  Infographics in Anesthesiology , 2013 .

[17]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies , 2010, Medical education.

[18]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[19]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals , 2015, BJU international.

[20]  F. Paas Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[21]  L. Hartling,et al.  Preferences of Knowledge Users for Two Formats of Summarizing Results from Systematic Reviews: Infographics and Critical Appraisals , 2015, PloS one.

[22]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting , 2007 .

[23]  Matthew A. Silva,et al.  A Preliminary Study of Health Care Professionals’ Preferences for Infographics Versus Conventional Abstracts for Communicating the Results of Clinical Research , 2014 .

[24]  Joanna C. Dunlap,et al.  Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics , 2016 .

[25]  R. Mayer Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[26]  G G Koch,et al.  The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. The case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. , 1996, Medical care.

[27]  Brent Thoma,et al.  Evidence-based medicine in the era of social media: Scholarly engagement through participation and online interaction. , 2017, CJEM.

[28]  J. Durlak How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. , 2009, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[29]  M. F. Khaliq,et al.  Physicians reading and writing practices: a cross-sectional study from Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan , 2012, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.