Which sperm parameter limits could really guide the clinical decision in assisted reproduction?
暂无分享,去创建一个
D. Santi | G. Spaggiari | M. Simoni | L. Aguzzoli | M. Villani | D. Morini | B. Melli | L. Valentina
[1] M. B.,et al. Which sperm parameter limits could really guide the clinical decision in assisted reproduction? , 2022, Endocrine Abstracts.
[2] D. Santi,et al. Real-world evidence analysis of the follicle-stimulating hormone use in male idiopathic infertility. , 2022, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.
[3] G. Corona,et al. The impact of male factors and their correct and early diagnosis in the infertile couple's pathway: 2021 perspectives , 2022, Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.
[4] A. Bruno,et al. Challenges in Interpreting Obstetrics and Gynecology Literature , 2022, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.
[5] E. Stachowska,et al. Human live spermatozoa morphology assessment using digital holographic microscopy , 2022, Scientific Reports.
[6] Y. Yogev,et al. Twinning in ART: Single embryo transfer policy. , 2022, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.
[7] K. Pantos,et al. Reporting on the Value of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting the Optimal Embryo for Transfer: A Systematic Review including Data Synthesis , 2022, Biomedicines.
[8] E. Baldi,et al. What advances may the future bring to the diagnosis, treatment, and care of male sexual and reproductive health? , 2022, Fertility and sterility.
[9] D. Santi,et al. The (decision) tree of fertility: an innovative decision-making algorithm in assisted reproduction technique , 2022, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
[10] Mario Festin,et al. Evolution of the WHO “Semen” processing manual from the first (1980) to the sixth edition (2021) , 2022, Fertility and sterility.
[11] D. Santi,et al. Are sperm parameters able to predict the success of assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of over 22,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles , 2021, Andrology.
[12] O. Ishihara,et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†. , 2021, Human reproduction.
[13] G. Letterie,et al. An artificial intelligence platform to optimize workflow during ovarian stimulation and IVF: process improvement and outcome-based predictions. , 2021, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[14] G. Uncu,et al. Supernumerary embryos, do they show the cycle success in a fresh embryo transfer? A retrospective analysis , 2021, Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.
[15] J. Singh,et al. Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles. , 2021, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[16] N. Spies,et al. Machine-learning algorithm incorporating capacitated sperm intracellular pH predicts conventional in vitro fertilization success in normospermic patients. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.
[17] P. Santulli,et al. The freeze-all strategy after IVF: which indications? , 2020, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[18] Yuan-zhen Zhang,et al. The effect of ICSI in infertility couples with non-male factor: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
[19] Wim Goettsch,et al. Improving transparency to build trust in real‐world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing—Why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the real‐world evidence transparency initiative , 2020, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.
[20] J. Bajpai,et al. “Petite” p value: A Researchers’ Dream! Readers, Beware of the Pit … , 2020, Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine.
[21] D. Santi,et al. Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Action on Spermatogenesis: A Focus on Physiological and Therapeutic Roles , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.
[22] G. Balercia,et al. Use of follicle‐stimulating hormone for the male partner of idiopathic infertile couples in Italy: Results from a multicentre, observational, clinical practice survey , 2019, Andrology.
[23] D. Santi,et al. FSH treatment of male idiopathic infertility: Time for a paradigm change , 2019, Andrology.
[24] L. Rienzi,et al. Contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate: a large multicentric cycle-based data analysis from the Italian National Registry , 2019, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.
[25] C. Farquhar,et al. Cumulative live birth rates following a ‘freeze-all’ strategy: a population-based study , 2019, Human reproduction open.
[26] V. Korsak,et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care , 2019, Problemy reproduktsii.
[27] S. Geber,et al. Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, JBRA assisted reproduction.
[28] L. Rienzi,et al. The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017 , 2017, Human reproduction.
[29] David Madigan,et al. Good practices for real‐world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR‐ISPE Special Task Force on real‐world evidence in health care decision making , 2017, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.
[30] J. Bogstad,et al. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen–thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols , 2017, Human reproduction.
[31] H. Tournaye,et al. A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis. , 2016, Human reproduction.
[32] E. Sullivan,et al. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. , 2014, Human reproduction.
[33] Osamu Ishihara,et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. , 2013, Human reproduction.
[34] S. Bhattacharya,et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.
[35] D. Mortimer,et al. ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance. , 2011, Human reproduction.
[36] G. L. La Sala,et al. Analysis of pronuclear zygote configurations in 459 clinical pregnancies obtained with assisted reproductive technique procedures , 2010, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.
[37] G. L. La Sala,et al. The effect of the 2004 Italian law on outcomes of assisted reproduction technology in severe male factor infertility. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.
[38] O. Ishihara,et al. The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. , 2009, Human reproduction.
[39] L. Garrison,et al. Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report. , 2007, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.
[40] C. Farquhar,et al. Gonadotrophins for idiopathic male factor subfertility. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[41] E. Nieschlag,et al. Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone for treatment of male idiopathic infertility: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. , 1998, Human reproduction.
[42] Christopher Chen. PREGNANCY AFTER HUMAN OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION , 1986, The Lancet.
[43] Alan Trounson,et al. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo , 1983, Nature.