SMEs and Environmental Regulations: A Study of the UK Screen-Printing Sector

In the literature of corporate greening, the regulatory domain has been identified as a key influence on the environmental behaviour of firms and has been linked to actions beyond compliance and to the pursuit of competitive advantage. That said, studies of the environmental performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) suggest that, on the whole, smaller firms tend to take a more reactive and compliant stance with regard to environmental legislation, with little evidence existing to suggest that regulation provides a strong baseline for internally driven change. The authors report the findings from empirical research undertaken to assess the impact of environmental legislation upon the activities of SMEs within the screen-printing sector in the United Kingdom and explore the motivations that have driven responses to such legislation. The aim of the research was to examine the extent to which regulation was a factor in explaining SME environmental behaviour, and to identify the nature of corporate responses to environmental change. In addressing these issues a hybrid methodology was adopted, based on a quantitative survey of 200 firms in the UK screen-printing industry and a qualitative analysis of five organisations chosen from the survey respondents. The results of the survey—which had a usable response rate of 33%—and from the case-study interviews shed important light on SME attitudes, awareness, and responses to existing regulatory requirements. The authors comment on how far the evidence supports the propositions in the extant literature and examine possible policy implications of the findings.

[1]  C. P. McLaughlin,et al.  TQM and Environmental Excellence in Manufacturing , 1993 .

[2]  Peter Dobers,et al.  Legislation-induced bubble markets: Driving forces of air pollution control technology in the field of waste incineration , 1996 .

[3]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Greening the firm : the politics of corporate environmentalism , 2000 .

[4]  Emiel Wubben What's in it for us? Or: the impact of environmental legislation on competitiveness , 1999 .

[5]  L. Zhuang,et al.  Legislation for the environment: does it work? ‐ an empirical study into selected UK‐based chemical manufacturing firms , 1997 .

[6]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[7]  Fiona Tilley,et al.  The gap between the environmental attitudes and the environmental behaviour of small firms , 1999 .

[8]  A. Schaefer,et al.  Stage models of corporate 'greening': a critical evaluation , 1998 .

[9]  Julie L. Hass ENVIRONMENTAL (‘GREEN’) MANAGEMENT TYPOLOGIES: AN EVALUATION, OPERATIONALIZATION AND EMPIRICAL DEVELOPMENT , 1996 .

[10]  Martin Lindell,et al.  Environmental Management: Testing the Win‐Win Model , 2000 .

[11]  Nigel Roome,et al.  Developing environmental management strategies , 1992 .

[12]  J. Merritt,et al.  EM into SME won't go? Attitudes, awareness and practices in the London Borough of Croydon , 1998 .

[13]  R. Handfield,et al.  The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes , 1998 .

[14]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach , 1996 .

[15]  N. Karagozoglu,et al.  Corporate environmental behaviour – a comparison between Nordic and US firms , 2001 .

[16]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework , 1998 .

[17]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[18]  Noan Walley,et al.  It's not easy being green , 1994 .

[19]  Judith Petts,et al.  THE CLIMATE AND CULTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE WITHIN SMEs , 1999 .