T‐cell receptor affinity in thymic development

Understanding the thymic processes that support the generation of functionally competent and self‐tolerant lymphocytes requires dissection of the T‐cell receptor (TCR) response to ligands of different affinities. In spatially segregated regions of the thymus, with unique expression of proteases and cytokines, TCR affinity guides a number of cell fate decisions. Yet affinity alone does not explain the selection paradox. Increasing evidence suggests that the ‘altered peptide’ model of the 1980s together with the affinity model might best explain how the thymus supports conventional and regulatory T‐cell development. Development of new tools to study the strength of TCR signals perceived by T cells, novel regulatory T‐cell transgenic mice, and tetramer enrichment strategies have provided an insight into the nature of TCR signals perceived during thymocyte development. These topics are discussed and support for the prevailing hypotheses is presented.

[1]  Nicole R. Cunningham,et al.  T cell receptor signal strength in Treg and iNKT cell development demonstrated by a novel fluorescent reporter mouse , 2011, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  L. Klein,et al.  Regulatory T‐cell differentiation versus clonal deletion of autoreactive thymocytes , 2011, Immunology and cell biology.

[3]  M. Ciofani,et al.  Determining γδ versus αβ T cell development , 2010, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[4]  S. Kaufmann,et al.  Lysosomal alpha-galactosidase controls the generation of self lipid antigens for natural killer T cells. , 2010, Immunity.

[5]  Ming O. Li,et al.  Transforming growth factor-beta signaling curbs thymic negative selection promoting regulatory T cell development. , 2010, Immunity.

[6]  D. Godfrey,et al.  Raising the NKT cell family , 2010, Nature Immunology.

[7]  K. Hogquist,et al.  Why CD8+ T cells need diversity when growing up. , 2010, Immunity.

[8]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Thymoproteasome shapes immunocompetent repertoire of CD8+ T cells. , 2010, Immunity.

[9]  D. Kovalovsky,et al.  A Novel TCR Transgenic Model Reveals That Negative Selection Involves an Immediate, Bim-Dependent Pathway and a Delayed, Bim-Independent Pathway , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  Q. Hu,et al.  Bim-Mediated Apoptosis Is Not Necessary for Thymic Negative Selection to Ubiquitous Self-Antigens1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[11]  L. Klein,et al.  Antigen presentation in the thymus for positive selection and central tolerance induction , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[12]  M. Gross,et al.  An endogenous peptide positively selects and augments the activation and survival of peripheral CD4+ T cells , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[13]  M. Davis,et al.  An endogenous positively selecting peptide enhances mature T cell responses and becomes an autoantigen in the absence of microRNA miR-181a , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[14]  J. Lafaille,et al.  TCR-dependent differentiation of thymic Foxp3+ cells is limited to small clonal sizes , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[15]  R. Flavell,et al.  Thymic self-reactivity selects natural interleukin 17-producing T cells that can regulate peripheral inflammation , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[16]  S. Jameson,et al.  Positive selection optimizes the number and function of MHCII-restricted CD4+ T cell clones in the naive polyclonal repertoire , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  A. Rudensky,et al.  Intraclonal competition limits the fate determination of regulatory T cells in the thymus , 2009, Nature Immunology.

[18]  A. Carrier,et al.  Thymus‐specific serine protease regulates positive selection of a subset of CD4+ thymocytes , 2009, European journal of immunology.

[19]  Rainer A Böckmann,et al.  Low-affinity peptides and T-cell selection. , 2009, Trends in immunology.

[20]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Digital Signaling and Hysteresis Characterize Ras Activation in Lymphoid Cells , 2009, Cell.

[21]  A. Singer,et al.  Lineage fate and intense debate: myths, models and mechanisms of CD4- versus CD8-lineage choice , 2008, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[22]  L. Gapin The making of NKT cells , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[23]  A. Krueger,et al.  T cell receptor–instructed αβ versus γδ lineage commitment revealed by single-cell analysis , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  Matthew A Burchill,et al.  Interleukin-2 receptor signaling in regulatory T cell development and homeostasis. , 2007, Immunology letters.

[25]  Nagendra Singh,et al.  Nonself-antigens are the cognate specificities of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. , 2007, Immunity.

[26]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Regulation of CD8+ T Cell Development by Thymus-Specific Proteasomes , 2007, Science.

[27]  Barbara Hausmann,et al.  Thymic selection threshold defined by compartmentalization of Ras/MAPK signalling , 2006, Nature.

[28]  A. Rudensky,et al.  An intersection between the self-reactive regulatory and nonregulatory T cell receptor repertoires , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[29]  K. Hogquist,et al.  A requirement for sustained ERK signaling during thymocyte positive selection in vivo. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D. Pellicci,et al.  The Influence of CD1d in Postselection NKT Cell Maturation and Homeostasis1 , 2005, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  M. Carleton,et al.  Attenuation of γδTCR Signaling Efficiently Diverts Thymocytes to the αβ Lineage , 2005 .

[32]  A. Hayday,et al.  Gammadelta T cell development--having the strength to get there. , 2005, Current opinion in immunology.

[33]  B. Beutler,et al.  Exogenous and endogenous glycolipid antigens activate NKT cells during microbial infections , 2005, Nature.

[34]  R. Proia,et al.  Lysosomal Glycosphingolipid Recognition by NKT Cells , 2004, Science.

[35]  S. Jameson,et al.  The Fourth Way? Harnessing Aggressive Tendencies in the Thymus1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[36]  M. Smyth,et al.  Antigen-induced tolerance by intrathymic modulation of self-recognizing inhibitory receptors , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[37]  C. Benoist,et al.  Self-reactivity in thymic double-positive cells commits cells to a CD8αα lineage with characteristics of innate immune cells , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[38]  A. Rudensky,et al.  Molecular aspects of regulatory T cell development. , 2004, Seminars in immunology.

[39]  Timothy K Starr,et al.  Positive and negative selection of T cells. , 2003, Annual review of immunology.

[40]  M. J. Page,et al.  CD1d-expressing Dendritic Cells but Not Thymic Epithelial Cells Can Mediate Negative Selection of NKT Cells , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[41]  Mark S. Anderson,et al.  Projection of an Immunological Self Shadow Within the Thymus by the Aire Protein , 2002, Science.

[42]  Stuart M. Brown,et al.  Rare, structurally homologous self-peptides promote thymocyte positive selection. , 2002, Immunity.

[43]  L. Teyton,et al.  A Thymic Precursor to the NK T Cell Lineage , 2002, Science.

[44]  H. Macdonald,et al.  Precursors of Functional MHC Class I- or Class II-Restricted CD8αα+ T Cells Are Positively Selected in the Thymus by Agonist Self-Peptides , 2002 .

[45]  E. Reinherz,et al.  A Naturally Processed Mitochondrial Self-Peptide in Complex with Thymic Mhc Molecules Functions as a Selecting Ligand for a Viral-Specific T Cell Receptor , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  A. Naji,et al.  Thymic selection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells induced by an agonist self-peptide , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[47]  Kristin A. Hogquist,et al.  Receptor editing in developing T cells , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[48]  P. Allen,et al.  A Kinetic Threshold between Negative and Positive Selection Based on the Longevity of the T Cell Receptor–Ligand Complex , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[49]  R. Germain,et al.  Divergent changes in the sensitivity of maturing T cells to structurally related ligands underlies formation of a useful T cell repertoire. , 1999, Immunity.

[50]  S. Jameson,et al.  Preselection Thymocytes Are More Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Stimulation Than Mature T Cells , 1998, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[51]  K. Hogquist,et al.  Development of peptide-selected CD8 T cells in fetal thymic organ culture occurs via the conventional pathway. , 1998, Journal of immunology.

[52]  A. Rudensky,et al.  Cathepsin L: critical role in Ii degradation and CD4 T cell selection in the thymus. , 1998, Science.

[53]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  Specific recognition of thymic self-peptides induces the positive selection of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. , 1997, Immunity.

[54]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Identification of a naturally occurring ligand for thymic positive selection. , 1997, Immunity.

[55]  S. Jameson,et al.  T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection , 1996, Nature.

[56]  M. Bevan,et al.  Strong agonist ligands for the T cell receptor do not mediate positive selection of functional CD8+ T cells. , 1995, Immunity.

[57]  P. Ohashi,et al.  Positive and negative thymocyte selection induced by different concentrations of a single peptide. , 1994, Science.

[58]  Kristin A. Hogquist,et al.  T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection , 1994, Cell.

[59]  J. Freed,et al.  Comparison of peptides bound to spleen and thymus class II , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[60]  S. Tonegawa,et al.  Peptide contributes to the specificity of positive selection of CD8+ T cells in the thymus , 1993, Cell.

[61]  F. Ramsdell,et al.  Clonal deletion versus clonal anergy: the role of the thymus in inducing self tolerance. , 1990, Science.

[62]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  [The T cell receptor]. , 1985, Harefuah.

[63]  Stanford Peng The Thymus , 1965, The Australian nurses' journal. Royal Australian Nursing Federation.