BOCR Framework for Decision Analysis

This paper considers establishing a framework for modellig decision analysis problems where the analyst must cope with uncertainty, multiple objectives, multiple attributes and multiple actors. These probems rise when considering large scale and complex decision problems encountered in real world applications in domains such as risk assessment and managment, infrastrucutres planning, complex process monitoring, supply chain planning, etc. To tackle this modelling chalenges, we propose to use BOCR (benefit, opportunity, cost, and risk) paradigm to identify attributes that must characterize an alternative with regard to a given objective. Then Bayesian network and/or AHP (analytic hierrarchy process) analysis can be used to assess the values of these later attributes. Finally an aggregation method based on satisficing game is developed that permit to evaluate each alternative by two measures: selectability degree constructed using “positive” attributes (benefit and opportunity) and the rejectability degree built on “negative” attributes (cost and risk).

[1]  Roger M. Y. Ho,et al.  Goal programming and extensions , 1976 .

[2]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Aide multicritère à la décision : méthodes et cas , 1993 .

[3]  Ivan Leudar,et al.  Plans and situated actions. The problem of human machine communication by Lucy A Suchman, 203 pages, Cambridge University Press 1987, £22.50 (hardback), £7.95 (paperback) , 1988, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[4]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1965 .

[5]  Ayeley P. Tchangani,et al.  Evaluation Model for Multiattributes-multiagents Decision Making: Satisficing Game Approach , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[6]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Goal programming for decision analysis , 1972 .

[7]  Silja Renooij,et al.  Probability elicitation for belief networks: issues to consider , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[8]  Giuseppe Carenini,et al.  Dealing with the Expert Inconsistency in Probability Elicitation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[9]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Optimization Software Guide , 1987 .

[10]  Ayeley P. Tchangani A satisficing game theory approach for group evaluation of production units , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[13]  Judith L. Anderson Embracing Uncertainty: The Interface of Bayesian Statistics and Cognitive Psychology , 1998 .

[14]  Ayeley P. Tchangani,et al.  Modeling selecting and ranking alternatives characterized by multiple attributes to satisfy multiple objectives , 2009 .

[15]  Chalee Asavathiratham,et al.  The influence model: a tractable representation for the dynamics of networked Markov chains , 2001 .

[16]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[17]  Marek J. Druzdzel,et al.  Elicitation of Probabilities for Belief Networks: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information , 1995, UAI.

[18]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[19]  Wynn C. Stirling Satisficing Games and Decision Making: With Applications to Engineering and Computer Science , 2003 .

[20]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .