Occupational exposure measurements of static and pulsed gradient magnetic fields in the vicinity of MRI scanners

Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have increased occupational exposure to magnetic fields. In this study, we examined the assessment of occupational exposure to gradient magnetic fields and time-varying magnetic fields generated by motion in non-homogeneous static magnetic fields of MRI scanners. These magnetic field components can be measured simultaneously with an induction coil setup that detects the time rate of change of magnetic flux density (dB/dt). The setup developed was used to measure the field components around two MRI units (1 T open and 3 T conventional). The measured values can be compared with dB/dt reference levels derived from magnetic flux density reference levels given by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The measured motion-induced dB/dt values were above the dB/dt reference levels for both MRI units. The measured values for the gradient fields (echo planar imaging (EPI) and fast field echo (FFE) sequences) also exceeded the dB/dt reference levels in positions where the medical staff may have access during interventional procedures. The highest motion-induced dB/dt values were 0.7 T s(-1) for the 1 T scanner and 3 T s(-1) for the 3 T scanner when only the static field was present. Even higher values (6.5 T s(-1)) were measured for simultaneous exposure to motion-induced and gradient fields in the vicinity of the 3 T scanner.

[1]  J. Patrick Reilly,et al.  Applied Bioelectricity: From Electrical Stimulation to Electropathology , 1998 .

[2]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[3]  K Jokela,et al.  Restricting exposure to pulsed and broadband magnetic fields. , 2000, Health physics.

[4]  Guidance on determining compliance of exposure to pulsed and complex non-sinusoidal waveforms below 100 kHz with ICNIRP guidelines. , 2003, Health physics.

[5]  M O Leach,et al.  Electromagnetic field exposure limitation and the future of MRI. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  IEEE COMMITTEE ON MAN AND RADIATION (COMAR) TECHNICAL INFORMATION STATEMENT “EXPOSURE OF MEDICAL PERSONNEL TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS FROM OPEN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING SYSTEMS” , 2005, Health physics.

[7]  Kate McLeish,et al.  Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe? , 2005, Academic radiology.

[8]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Numerical study of currents in occupational workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets , 2007 .

[9]  Hannah Heinrich,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF NON-SINUSOIDAL, PULSED, OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURE TO LOW FREQUENCY ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS , 2007, Health physics.

[10]  John G R Jefferys,et al.  A NEUROBIOLOGICAL BASIS FOR ELF GUIDELINES , 2007, Health physics.

[11]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Magnetic‐field‐induced vertigo: A theoretical and experimental investigation , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[12]  Martin O Leach,et al.  Measurements of occupational exposure to switched gradient and spatially‐varying magnetic fields in areas adjacent to 1.5T clinical MRI systems , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Penny A Gowland,et al.  Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic field , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  D J Collins,et al.  EU Directive 2004/40: field measurements of a 1.5 T clinical MR scanner. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[15]  K. Jokela ASSESSMENT OF COMPLEX EMF EXPOSURE SITUATIONS INCLUDING INHOMOGENEOUS FIELD DISTRIBUTION , 2007, Health physics.

[16]  Jill K Bradley,et al.  Occupational exposure to static and time‐varying gradient magnetic fields in MR units , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  E. Scurr,et al.  British association of MR radiographers (BAMRR) safety survey 2005: Potential impact of European Union (EU) Physical Agents Directive (PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF) , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  E. Scurr,et al.  British association of MR radiographers (BAMRR) safety survey 2005: Potential impact of European Union (EU) Physical Agents Directive (PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF) , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Exposure of workers to pulsed gradients in MRI , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Norbert Leitgeb,et al.  Assessment of multiple frequency ELF electric and magnetic field exposure , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  R Bowtell,et al.  Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Analysis and Measurements of Magnetic Field Exposures for Healthcare Workers in SelectedMR Environments , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.