Policies for patient access to clinical data via PHRs: current state and recommendations

OBJECTIVE Healthcare delivery organizations are increasingly using online personal health records (PHRs) to provide patients with direct access to their clinical information; however, there may be a lack of consistency in the data made available. We aimed to understand the general use and functionality of PHRs and the organizational policies and decision-making structures for making data available to patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cross-sectional survey was administered by telephone structured interview to 21 organizations to determine the types of data made available to patients through PHRs and the presence of explicit governance for PHR data release. Organizations were identified based on a review of the literature, PHR experts, and snowball sampling. Organizations that did not provide patients with electronic access to their data via a PHR were excluded. RESULTS Interviews were conducted with 17 organizations for a response rate of 81%. Half of the organizations had explicit governance in the form of a written policy that outlined the data types made available to patients. Overall, 88% of the organizations used a committee structure for the decision-making process and included senior management and information services. All organizations sought input from clinicians. Discussion There was considerable variability in the types of clinical data and the time frame for releasing these data to patients. Variability in data release policies may have implications for PHR use and adoption. CONCLUSIONS Future policy activities, such as requirement specification for the latter stages of Meaningful Use, should be leveraged as an opportunity to encourage standardization of functionality and broad deployment of PHRs.

[1]  Charles Safran,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Governance for Personal Health Records , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Early Experiences with Personal Health Records , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Kevin J O'Leary,et al.  Hospitalized patients' understanding of their plan of care. , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. , 2010, Health affairs.

[5]  Charles Safran,et al.  Telematics In The Neonatal ICU And Beyond: Improving Care, Communication and Information Sharing , 1998, MedInfo.

[6]  William R Doucette,et al.  Family physician perceptions of personal health records. , 2010, Perspectives in health information management.

[7]  C. Mundie,et al.  Personal health management systems: applying the full power of software to improve the quality and efficiency of care. , 2009, Health affairs.

[8]  Brahm Goldstein,et al.  Interactive Web sites for families and physicians of pediatric intensive care unit patients: A preliminary report* , 2004, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[9]  Paul C. Tang,et al.  Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[10]  Ethan Cumbler,et al.  Lack of patient knowledge regarding hospital medications. , 2009, Journal of hospital medicine.

[11]  Hugo Sax,et al.  Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. , 2010, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[12]  Kenneth D Mandl,et al.  Acceptability of a Personally Controlled Health Record in a Community-Based Setting: Implications for Policy and Design , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Denise Polit-O'Hara,et al.  Nursing Research: Principles and Methods , 1978 .

[14]  R. Harvey,et al.  Decision-making preference and opportunity in VA ambulatory care patients: association with patient satisfaction. , 1999, Research in nursing & health.

[15]  David W. Bates,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs) , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Teresa Zayas-Cabán,et al.  Information gap: can health insurer personal health records meet patients' and physicians' needs? , 2009, Health affairs.

[17]  Leslie R. Martin,et al.  Facilitation of Patient Involvement in Care: Development and Validation of a Scale , 2001, Behavioral medicine.

[18]  Ted Cooper,et al.  Case report: Breaching the Security of the Kaiser Permanente Internet Patient Portal: the Organizational Foundations of Information Security , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Felicia M Bowens,et al.  Health information technology: integration of clinical workflow into meaningful use of electronic health records. , 2010, Perspectives in health information management.

[20]  Lena Sorensen,et al.  Patient Portals: Survey of Nursing Informaticists , 2009, Nursing Informatics.

[21]  S. Compton,et al.  Nursing research. Principles and methods: 7th edition , 2005 .

[22]  D. Lansky,et al.  The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. , 2005, Health affairs.

[23]  David O Meltzer,et al.  Does doctor-patient communication affect patient satisfaction with hospital care? Results of an analysis with a novel instrumental variable. , 2008, Health services research.

[24]  Adam Bosworth,et al.  What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. , 2009, Health affairs.

[25]  Charles Safran,et al.  Improving personal health records for patient-centered care , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[26]  Joann G. Elmore,et al.  Open Notes: Doctors and Patients Signing On , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.