Stratified aboveground forest biomass estimation by remote sensing data

Abstract Remote sensing-assisted estimates of aboveground forest biomass are essential for modeling carbon budgets. It has been suggested that estimates can be improved by building species- or strata-specific biomass models. However, few studies have attempted a systematic analysis of the benefits of such stratification, especially in combination with other factors such as sensor type, statistical prediction method and sampling design of the reference inventory data. We addressed this topic by analyzing the impact of stratifying forest data into three classes (broadleaved, coniferous and mixed forest). We compare predictive accuracy (a) between the strata (b) to a case without stratification for a set of pre-selected predictors from airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral data obtained in a managed mixed forest site in southwestern Germany. We used 5 commonly applied algorithms for biomass predictions on bootstrapped subsamples of the data to obtain cross validated RMSE and r2 diagnostics. Those values were analyzed in a factorial design by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) to rank the relative importance of each factor. Selected models were used for wall-to-wall mapping of biomass estimates and their associated uncertainty. The results revealed marginal advantages for the strata-specific prediction models over the unstratified ones, which were more obvious on the wall-to-wall mapped area-based predictions. Yet further tests are necessary to establish the generality of these results. Input data type and statistical prediction method are concluded to remain the two most crucial factors for the quality of remote sensing-assisted biomass models.

[1]  B. Koch,et al.  Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors , 2010 .

[2]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[3]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[4]  Alain Baccini,et al.  yaImpute: An R Package for kNN Imputation , 2007 .

[5]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  kernlab - An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R , 2004 .

[6]  C. Chen,et al.  Rice area mapping, yield, and production forecast for the province of Nueva Ecija using RADARSAT imagery , 2011 .

[7]  D. Roberts,et al.  Estimation of tropical rain forest aboveground biomass with small-footprint lidar and hyperspectral sensors , 2011 .

[8]  M. Heurich,et al.  Estimation of forestry stand parameters using laser scanning data in temperate, structurally rich natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests , 2008 .

[9]  M. Vastaranta,et al.  Predicting individual tree attributes from airborne laser point clouds based on the random forests technique , 2011 .

[10]  Yuri A. Gritz,et al.  Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. , 2003, Journal of plant physiology.

[11]  Fabian Ewald Fassnacht,et al.  Forest structure modeling with combined airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data , 2012 .

[12]  Robert A. Lordo,et al.  Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models , 2005, Technometrics.

[13]  H. Andersen,et al.  Predicting live and dead tree basal area of bark beetle affected forests from discrete-return lidar , 2013 .

[14]  Jungho Im,et al.  ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 2022 .

[15]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Fusion of Small-Footprint Lidar and Multispectral Data to Estimate Plot- Level Volume and Biomass in Deciduous and Pine Forests in Virginia, USA , 2004, Forest Science.

[16]  Barbara Koch,et al.  Status and future of laser scanning, synthetic aperture radar and hyperspectral remote sensing data for forest biomass assessment , 2010 .

[17]  Hailemariam Temesgen,et al.  A Comparison of Selected Parametric and Non-Parametric Imputation Methods for Estimating Forest Biomass and Basal Area , 2014 .

[18]  Trevor J. Hastie,et al.  Confidence intervals for random forests: the jackknife and the infinitesimal jackknife , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[20]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing , 2005 .

[21]  Barbara Koch,et al.  Evaluation of most similar neighbour and random forest methods for imputing forest inventory variables using data from target and auxiliary stands , 2012 .

[22]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Machine learning regression algorithms for biophysical parameter retrieval: Opportunities for Sentinel-2 and -3 , 2012 .

[23]  I. Burke,et al.  Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests , 2005 .

[24]  A. Bloom,et al.  Are Inventory Based and Remotely Sensed Above-Ground Biomass Estimates Consistent? , 2013, PloS one.

[25]  J. Heikkinen,et al.  Stratification of regional sampling by model-predicted changes of carbon stocks in forested mineral soils , 2007 .

[26]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Sampling Techniques, 3rd Edition , 1963 .

[27]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[28]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Model effects on GLAS-based regional estimates of forest biomass and carbon , 2010 .

[29]  E. Næsset,et al.  Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data , 2010 .

[30]  Sandra Eckert,et al.  Improved Forest Biomass and Carbon Estimations Using Texture Measures from WorldView-2 Satellite Data , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[31]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Applied Predictive Modeling , 2013 .

[32]  M. Ashton,et al.  Accuracy assessments of hyperspectral waveband performance for vegetation analysis applications , 2004 .

[33]  Sorin C. Popescu,et al.  Fusion of lidar and multispectral data to quantify salt marsh carbon stocks , 2014 .

[34]  B. Koch,et al.  TREESVIS-A SOFTWARE SYSTEM FOR SIMULTANEOUS 3 D-REAL-TIME VISUALISATION OF DTM , DSM , LASER RAW DATA , MULTISPECTRAL DATA , SIMPLE TREE AND BUILDING MODELS , 2004 .

[35]  D. Pitt,et al.  Parametric vs. nonparametric LiDAR models for operational forest inventory in boreal Ontario , 2013 .

[36]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  Stratification by ancillary data in multisource forest inventories employing k-nearest-neighbour estimation , 2002 .

[37]  H. Andersen,et al.  Using multilevel remote sensing and ground data to estimate forest biomass resources in remote regions: a case study in the boreal forests of interior Alaska , 2011 .

[38]  R. Fournier,et al.  A comparison of four methods to map biomass from Landsat-TM and inventory data in western Newfoundland , 2006 .

[39]  M. Maltamo,et al.  The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2007 .

[40]  M. Neteler,et al.  Fusion of airborne LiDAR and satellite multispectral data for the estimation of timber volume in the Southern Alps , 2011 .

[41]  R. Jenssen,et al.  1 THE HYMAP TM AIRBORNE HYPERSPECTRAL SENSOR : THE SYSTEM , CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[42]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Inference for lidar-assisted estimation of forest growing stock volume , 2013 .

[43]  J. Breidenbach,et al.  Comparison of nearest neighbour approaches for small area estimation of tree species-specific forest inventory attributes in central Europe using airborne laser scanner data , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[45]  Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.  Model Assisted Survey Sampling , 1997 .

[46]  G. Asner,et al.  Fusing small-footprint waveform LiDAR and hyperspectral data for canopy-level species classification and herbaceous biomass modeling in savanna ecosystems , 2011 .

[47]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures , 2005 .

[48]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Evaluating the Remote Sensing and Inventory-Based Estimation of Biomass in the Western Carpathians , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[49]  Mark H. Hansen,et al.  The forest inventory and analysis sampling frame , 2005 .

[50]  E. Næsset,et al.  Post-stratified estimation of forest area and growing stock volume using lidar-based stratifications , 2012 .

[51]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[52]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimation of above- and below-ground biomass across regions of the boreal forest zone using airborne laser , 2008 .

[53]  J. Swenson,et al.  A comparison of lidar, radar, and field measurements of canopy height in pine and hardwood forests of southeastern North America , 2009 .

[54]  Henning Buddenbaum,et al.  Comparison of Feature Reduction Algorithms for Classifying Tree Species With Hyperspectral Data on Three Central European Test Sites , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[55]  James A. Westfall,et al.  Post-stratified estimation: with-in strata and total sample size recommendations , 2011 .

[56]  F. Breidt,et al.  Nonparametric endogenous post-stratification estimation , 2013 .

[57]  M. Ashton,et al.  Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM+ sensors in the study of African rainforests , 2004 .

[58]  F. Rosillo-calle,et al.  The biomass assessment handbook : bioenergy for a sustainable environment , 2008 .

[59]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Using multi-frequency radar and discrete-return LiDAR measurements to estimate above-ground biomass and biomass components in a coastal temperate forest , 2012 .

[60]  Kenneth B. Pierce,et al.  Quantification of live aboveground forest biomass dynamics with Landsat time-series and field inventory data: A comparison of empirical modeling approaches , 2010 .