Investigation of filter sets for supervised pixel classification of cephalometric landmarks by spatial spectroscopy.

The diagnostic process of orthodontics requires the analysis of a cephalometric radiograph. Image landmarks on this two-dimensional lateral projection image of the patient's head are manually identified and spatial relationships are evaluated. This method is very time consuming. A reliable method for automatic computer landmark identification does not exist. Spatial Spectroscopy is a proposed method of automatic landmark identification on cephalometric radiographs, that decomposes an image by convolving it with a set of filters followed by a statistical decision process. The purpose of this paper is to discuss and test appropriate filter sets for the application of Spatial Spectroscopy for automatic identification of cephalometric radiographic landmarks. This study evaluated two different filter sets with 15 landmarks on fourteen images. Spatial Spectroscopy was able to consistently locate landmarks on all 14 cephalometric radiographs tested. The mean landmark identification error of 0.841 +/- 1.253 pixels for a Multiscale Derivative filter set and 0.912 +/- 1.364 pixels for an Offset Gaussian filter set was not significantly different. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between identification of individual landmarks for the Multiscale Derivative and the Offset Gaussian filter set (P > 0.05). These results suggest that Spatial Spectroscopy may be useful in landmark identification tasks.

[1]  James M. Coggins,et al.  A multiscale description of image structure for segmentation of biomedical images , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the First Conference on Visualization in Biomedical Computing.

[2]  Sheldon Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements , 1971 .

[3]  J M Coggins,et al.  Development and application of a three-dimensional artificial visual system. , 1985, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[4]  R. Young.  GAUSSIAN DERIVATIVE THEORY OF SPATIAL VISION: ANALYSIS OF CORTICAL CELL RECEPTIVE FIELD LINE-WEIGHTING PROFILES. , 1985 .

[5]  James M. Coggins,et al.  Supervised pixel classification using a feature space derived from an artificial visual system , 1991, Other Conferences.

[6]  R A Young,et al.  The Gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. Retinal mechanisms. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[7]  S T Nugent,et al.  Automatic landmarking of cephalograms. , 1989, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[8]  John K. Tsotsos,et al.  Knowledge-based landmarking of cephalograms. , 1986, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[9]  Y A Mostafa,et al.  Automated cephalographic soft-tissue analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[10]  J. M. Coggins.  Measuring image structures using a multiscale orientation field , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[11]  J M Coggins,et al.  Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  Richard A. Young,et al.  SIMULATION OF HUMAN RETINAL FUNCTION WITH THE GAUSSIAN DERIVATIVE MODEL. , 1986 .

[13]  Richard A. Young,et al.  The Gaussian Derivative Model for Machine and Biological Image Processing , 1985 .