Influence of Probability of Variation Operator on the Performance of Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm for 0/1 Knapsack Problem

Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm (QEA) has been shown to be better performing than classical Ge- netic Algorithm based evolutionary techniques for combinatorial optimization problems like 0/1 knapsack problem. QEA uses quantum computing-inspired representation of solution called Q-bit individual consisting of Q-bits. The probability amplitudes of the Q-bits are changed by application of Q-gate operator, which is classical analogous of quantum rotation operator. The Q-gate operator is the only variation operator used in QEA, which along with some problem specific heuris- tic provides exploitation of the properties of the best solutions. In this paper, we analyzed the characteristics of the QEA for 0/1 knapsack problem and showed that a probability in the range 0.3 to 0.4 for the application of the Q-gate variation operator has the greatest likelihood of making a good balance between exploration and exploitation. Experimental results agree with the analytical finding.

[1]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Parallel quantum-inspired genetic algorithm for combinatorial optimization problem , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).

[2]  Kyu Ho Park,et al.  A Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Computing Algorithm for Disk Allocation Method , 2003 .

[3]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  On setting the parameters of quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for practical application , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[4]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithm for a class of combinatorial optimization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[5]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Genetic quantum algorithm and its application to combinatorial optimization problem , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[6]  Deeparnab Chakrabarty,et al.  Knapsack Problems , 2008 .

[7]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Algorithms With a New Termination Criterion , H Gate , and Two-Phase Scheme , 2009 .

[9]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[10]  Seth Stovack Kessler Piezoelectric-based in-situ damage detection of composite materials for structural health monitoring systems , 2002 .

[11]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[12]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Quantum-inspired evolutionary algorithms with a new termination criterion, H/sub /spl epsi// gate, and two-phase scheme , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Ajit Narayanan,et al.  Quantum computing for beginners , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[14]  Jong-Hwan Kim,et al.  Quantum-Inspired Evolutionary Algorithm-Based Face Verification , 2003, GECCO.

[15]  Ajit Narayanan,et al.  Quantum-inspired genetic algorithms , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 2000, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.