Unpacking and repacking the factors affecting students' perceptions of the use of classroom communication systems (CCS) technology
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. Anthis,et al. Is It the Clicker, or Is It the Question? Untangling the Effects of Student Response System Use , 2011 .
[2] Carl E. Wieman,et al. Why Not Try a Scientific Approach to Science Education? , 2007 .
[3] Jill A. Marshall,et al. Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature , 2006 .
[4] N. Lasry,et al. Peer instruction: From Harvard to the two-year college , 2008 .
[5] Michael E. Lantz,et al. The use of 'Clickers' in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[6] Michele E Barbour,et al. Electronic voting in dental materials education: the impact on students' attitudes and exam performance. , 2008, Journal of dental education.
[7] R. Kay,et al. Exploring Individual Differences in Attitudes toward Audience Response Systems , 2009 .
[8] Alfred Joseph Lizzio,et al. University Students' Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for theory and practice , 2002 .
[9] J. Burkell,et al. The dilemma of survey nonresponse , 2003 .
[10] P. Petegem,et al. The impact of instructional development in higher education: the state-of-the-art of the research , 2010 .
[11] A. Biglan. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .
[12] Bruce Thompson,et al. Psychometric Properties of Scores from the Web-based LibQUAL+ Study of Perceptions of Library Service Quality , 2001, Libr. Trends.
[13] Margaret I. Brown,et al. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[14] Robert J. Dufresne,et al. Assessing-To-Learn: Formative Assessment in Physics Instruction , 2004 .
[15] Bill Rogers,et al. Context matters: increasing understanding with interactive Clicker Case studies , 2011 .
[16] Gene G. Byrd,et al. Exploring the Universe Together: Cooperative Quizzes with and without a Classroom Performance System in Astronomy 101. , 2004 .
[17] Mark C. James. The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction , 2006 .
[18] C. Teddlie,et al. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .
[19] Katharine D. Owens,et al. Using Conceptests to Assess and Improve Student Conceptual Understanding in Introductory Geoscience Courses , 2006 .
[20] Anne Foegen,et al. Group Response Technology in Lecture-Based Instruction: Exploring Student Engagement and Instructor Perceptions , 1999 .
[21] Carla Carnaghan,et al. Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning and Engagement in Accounting Education , 2007 .
[22] N. Entwistle,et al. Taking stock: An overview of research findings , 2010 .
[23] Helena Seli,et al. "Clickers" and metacognition: A quasi-experimental comparative study about metacognitive self-regulation and use of electronic feedback devices , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[24] Ian D. Beatty,et al. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching , 2005, physics/0508114.
[25] B. Tabachnick,et al. Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .
[26] Jane E Caldwell,et al. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.
[27] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.
[28] D. Hosmer,et al. Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .
[29] Kirsten Crossgrove,et al. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.
[30] Michele H. Jackson,et al. The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university‐level courses using student response systems , 2007 .
[31] William J. Gerace,et al. Technology-Enhanced Formative Assessment: A Research-Based Pedagogy for Teaching Science with Classroom Response Technology , 2009 .
[32] Robin H. Kay,et al. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..
[33] Adrian Kirkwood,et al. The influence upon design of differing conceptions of teaching and learning with technology , 2012 .
[34] B. Ashar,et al. Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals , 2003, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.
[35] Lorena Blasco-Arcas,et al. Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[36] Scott R. Homan,et al. Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes , 2008 .
[37] Eric Mazur,et al. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .
[38] Anna Genell,et al. Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.
[39] G. Boulton‐Lewis. Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .
[40] J. P. Rushton,et al. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses , 1990 .
[41] Lisa Greer,et al. Real-Time Analysis of Student Comprehension: An Assessment of Electronic Student Response Technology in an Introductory Earth Science Course , 2004 .
[42] Adam Finkelstein,et al. Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[43] Russel L. Thompson,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .
[44] J. Fereday,et al. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development , 2006 .
[45] D. Kember. Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university , 2009 .
[46] A. Biglan. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .
[47] W. G. Perry. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .
[48] Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun,et al. Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data , 2014, Comput. Educ..
[49] Federica Barbieri,et al. What Are They Talking about? Lessons Learned from a Study of Peer Instruction. , 2008 .
[50] Erika G. Offerdahl,et al. Changes in instructors' assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies , 2011 .
[51] Daniel Zingaro,et al. Peer Instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention , 2014, Comput. Educ..
[52] Matthew J. Koehler,et al. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[53] Abbas Tashakkori,et al. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .
[54] Carlos Gonzalez,et al. Conceptions of, and approaches to, teaching online: a study of lecturers teaching postgraduate distance courses , 2009 .
[55] Peter White,et al. Clicking for grades? Really? Investigating the use of clickers for awarding grade-points in post-secondary education , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..
[56] Marcie N. Desrochers,et al. Effect of answer format and review method on college students' learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[57] J. Biggs,et al. Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .
[58] Shannon D. Willoughby,et al. Technology talks: Clickers and grading incentive in the large lecture hall , 2009 .
[59] Frederick Reif,et al. Scientific approaches to science education , 1986 .