Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia

It has long been argued that face processing requires disproportionate reliance on holistic or configural processing, relative to that required for non-face object recognition, and that a disruption of such holistic processing may be causally implicated in prosopagnosia. Previously, we demonstrated that individuals with congenital prosopagnosia (CP) did not show the normal face inversion effect (better performance for upright compared to inverted faces) and evinced a local (rather than the normal global) bias in a compound letter global/local (GL) task, supporting the claim of disrupted holistic processing in prosopagnosia. Here, we investigate further the nature of holistic processing impairments in CP, first by confirming, in a large sample of CP individuals, the absence of the normal face inversion effect and the presence of the local bias on the GL task, and, second, by employing the composite face paradigm, often regarded as the gold standard for measuring holistic face processing. In this last task, we show that, in contrast with controls, the CP group perform equivalently with aligned and misaligned faces and was impervious to (the normal) interference from the task-irrelevant bottom part of faces. Interestingly, the extent of the local bias evident in the composite task is correlated with the abnormality of performance on diagnostic face processing tasks. Furthermore, there is a significant correlation between the magnitude of the local bias in the GL and performance on the composite task. These results provide further evidence for impaired holistic processing in CP and, moreover, corroborate the critical role of this type of processing for intact face recognition.

[1]  D. Navon What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind? , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Does response interference contribute to face composite effects? , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Susanne Huber,et al.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[5]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[6]  B. Stephan,et al.  Aberrant pattern of scanning in prosopagnosia reflects impaired face processing , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect , 1995 .

[8]  Tobias Elze,et al.  Deficits in Long-Term Recognition Memory Reveal Dissociated Subtypes in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  B. Duchaine,et al.  Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processing , 2000, Neuroreport.

[10]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Functional MRI Reveals Compromised Neural Integrity of the Face Processing Network in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, Current Biology.

[11]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Congenital prosopagnosia: face-blind from birth , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study , 2012, Cortex.

[13]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[14]  Christian Dobel,et al.  Prosopagnosia Without Apparent Cause: Overview and Diagnosis of Six Cases , 2007, Cortex.

[15]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Allison B Sekuler,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.

[17]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise Effects Are Not All or None: Spatially Limited Perceptual Expertise for Faces in a Case of Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does Prosopagnosia Take the Eyes Out of Face Representations? Evidence for a Defect in Representing Diagnostic Facial Information following Brain Damage , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[20]  Nouchine Hadjikhani,et al.  Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Face-selective Activation in a Congenital Prosopagnosic Subject , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Avi Chaudhuri,et al.  The influence of attention on holistic face encoding , 2002, Cognition.

[27]  C. Macrae,et al.  Processing style and person recognition: Exploring the face inversion effect , 2010 .

[28]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  A bilateral occipitotemporal network mediates face perception , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  A comparative case study of face recognition: The contribution of configural and part-based recognition systems, and their interaction , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  V. Bruce,et al.  Local and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness , 1998, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Effects of processing bias on the recognition of composite face halves , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  Ruth Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[35]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[38]  B. Rossion Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[39]  D. Bub,et al.  Is the loss of diagnosticity of the eye region of the face a common aspect of acquired prosopagnosia? , 2009, Journal of neuropsychology.

[40]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Too Many Trees to See the Forest: Performance, Event-related Potential, and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Manifestations of Integrative Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic processing impairment can be restricted to faces in acquired prosopagnosia: evidence from the global/local Navon effect. , 2011, Journal of neuropsychology.

[42]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise: Bridging Brain and Behavior , 2009 .

[43]  D. Levine,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A defect in visual configural processing , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[45]  Douglas Martin,et al.  Some witnesses are better than others , 2009 .

[46]  S. Bentin,et al.  Priming global and local processing of composite faces: revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[47]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Mariya V. Cherkasova,et al.  Impaired spatial coding within objects but not between objects in prosopagnosia , 2005, Neurology.

[49]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  What is Meant by Impaired Configural Processing in Acquired Prosopagnosia? , 2009, Perception.

[50]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Implicit familiarity processing in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[51]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.

[52]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[53]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  B. Rossion,et al.  Impaired processing of relative distances between features and of the eye region in acquired prosopagnosia—Two sides of the same holistic coin? , 2010, Cortex.

[56]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Regional Variation in the Inversion Effect for Faces: Differential Effects for Feature Shape, Feature Configuration, and External Contour , 2004, Perception.

[57]  F. Mast,et al.  Configural and featural processing in humans with congenital prosopagnosia. , 2010, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[58]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Cognitive Neuropsychology Family Resemblance: Ten Family Members with Prosopagnosia and Within-class Object Agnosia , 2022 .

[59]  Michael L. Mack,et al.  Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance , 2009, Vision Research.

[60]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[61]  G. Yovel,et al.  Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[62]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect , 2010, Cortex.

[63]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Preservation of mouth region processing in two cases of prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[64]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[65]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .

[66]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Fusiform Gyrus Face Selectivity Relates to Individual Differences in Facial Recognition Ability , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Denise A. Minnebusch,et al.  Event‐related potentials reflect heterogeneity of developmental prosopagnosia , 2007, European Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[69]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Specialized Face Perception Mechanisms Extract Both Part and Spacing Information: Evidence from Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[71]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Impairments of Biological Motion Perception in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, PloS one.

[72]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  R. Kimchi Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.