Investigation of energy, emission, and cost advantages of energy hubs: A simulation case study for Toronto

This work uses TRNSYS simulations with archetypal residential and commercial building energy demand data to evaluate the performance of a multi-building energy hub with a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system. Within this framework, conventional and combined heat and power (CHP) energy generation technologies are implemented in different scenarios to meet the cooling, heating, and domestic hot water demands of the energy hub system. Detailed system performances over the year are simulated using an annual simulation. The energy generation, environmental impact, and economic implications of the energy hub simulation results are analyzed and compared against the same multi-building system with independent heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The results indicate that a combined system has potential benefits in local energy security, in emission reduction, and in lowering the operating costs of CHP systems in an energy hub as compared to independent systems. The results also indicate that application of CHP technology in a Toronto scenario results in a decrease in operational costs compared to a conventional HVAC system. Lastly, evaluation of the environmental impact of each simulated system indicates that the CHP system would increase emissions in an Ontario scenario.

[1]  Josep M. Guerrero,et al.  Stochastic analysis of residential micro combined heat and power system , 2017 .

[2]  Donald G. Fink,et al.  Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers , 1978 .

[3]  Jean-Louis Scartezzini,et al.  Electrical hubs: An effective way to integrate non-dispatchable renewable energy sources with minimum impact to the grid , 2017 .

[4]  Frank Fuller Fowle,et al.  Standard handbook for electrical engineers , 2012 .

[5]  Kurt Roth,et al.  Using CHP Systems In Commercial Buildings , 2005 .

[6]  Bohumil Horák,et al.  A review of micro combined heat and power systems for residential applications , 2016 .

[7]  Mari Sepponen,et al.  Business concepts for districts’ Energy hub systems with maximised share of renewable energy , 2016 .

[8]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  An energy systems engineering approach for the design and operation of microgrids in residential applications , 2013 .

[9]  Samaneh Pazouki,et al.  Optimal planning and scheduling of energy hub in presence of wind, storage and demand response under uncertainty , 2016 .

[10]  Zhiqiang Zhai,et al.  Performance comparison of combined cooling heating and power system in different operation modes , 2011 .

[11]  G. Andersson,et al.  Energy hubs for the future , 2007, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[12]  Daniel Daví Arderius,et al.  CO2 Content of Electricity Losses , 2016 .

[13]  Peter Tzscheutschler,et al.  Modeling of industrial-scale hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) – The profitability of decentralized supply for industry , 2017 .

[14]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues , 2005 .

[15]  T. C. Kandpal,et al.  Financial attractiveness of decentralized renewable energy systems - A case of the central Himalayan state of Uttarakhand in India , 2017 .