Effect of day and night temperature on internode and stem length in chrysanthemum: is everything explained by DIF?

In many plant species, including chrysanthemum, a strong positive correlation between internode length and DIF [difference between day (DT) and night (NT) temperature] has been observed. However, Langton and Cockshull (1997. Scientia Horticulturae 69: 229-237) reported no such relationship and showed that absolute DT and NT explained internode length rather than DIF. To investigate these conflicting results and to clarify the validity of the DIF concept, cut chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum 'Reagan Improved') were grown in growth chambers at all 16 combinations of four DT and four NT (16, 20, 24 and 28 degrees C) with a 12 h day length. Length of internode 10, number of internodes and stem length were measured on days 5, 10, 17, 22 and 27 after starting the temperature treatments. Internode length on day 10 showed a positive linear relationship with DIF (R2 = 0.64). However, when internodes had reached their final length in all treatments (day 27), a much stronger positive linear relation was observed (R2 = 0.81). A model to predict final internode length was developed based on the absolute DT and NT responses: both responses were optimum curves and no significant interaction between DT and NT occurred [final internode length (mm) = -32.23 + 3.56DT + 1.08NT - 0.0687DT2 - 0.0371NT2; R2 = 0.91, where TD is day temperature and TN is night temperature]. It is shown that DIF can predict final internode length only within a temperature range where effects of DT and NT are equal in magnitude and opposite in sign (18-24 degrees C). Internode appearance rate, as well as stem length formed during the experiment, showed an optimum response to DT.

[1]  K. Cockshull,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DIF TREATMENTS ON CHRYSANTHEMUM AND POINSETTIA , 1995 .

[2]  Brian Thomas,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Manipulation of Horticultural Crops , 1997 .

[3]  L. Smeets,et al.  Effect of day and night temperatures during short photoperiods on growth and flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat , 1984 .

[4]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Crop growth and development. , 1995 .

[5]  R. Larsen,et al.  Predicting leaf unfolding in flower induced shoots of greenhouse grown chrysanthemum , 1995 .

[6]  Patterns in stem elongation rate in chrysanthemum and tomato plants in relation to irradiance and day/night temperature , 1994 .

[7]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Influence of greenhouse climate and plant density on external quality of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura): First steps towards a quality model , 2001 .

[8]  F. Went.  Plant growth under controlled conditions. II. Thermoperiodicity in growth and fruiting of the tomato , 1944 .

[9]  R. Heins,et al.  Thermomorphogenesis in Lilium longiflorum , 1989 .

[10]  H. Challa,et al.  Greenhouse Climate Control: An Integrated Approach , 2001 .

[11]  E. Heuvelink.  Influence of day and night temperature on the growth of young tomato plants. , 1989 .

[12]  R. Heins,et al.  A Model of Chrysanthemum Stem Elongation , 1994 .

[13]  R. Heins,et al.  Thermomorphogenic Responses in Stem and Leaf Development , 1995 .

[14]  Roar Moe,et al.  Effect of diurnal temperature alternations on plant morphology in some greenhouse crops. A mini review , 1995 .

[15]  Royal D. Heins,et al.  Temperature and Photosynthetic Photon Flux Influence Chrysanthemum Shoot Development and Flower Initiation under Short-day Conditions , 1989, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.