Perception of artificial stereoscopic stimuli from an incorrect viewing point

The present study investigates the distortions in the perception of artificial stereoscopic displays seen from an inappropriate distance and/or orientation. Stereoscopic displays represent 3-D information correctly, provided they are seen from the correct station point. The viewing point may differ from the correct station point in its distance or in its orientation to the screen. These differences lead to distortions that can be predicted mathematically. However, the perceptual function may be different from the predictions, since people may possibly compensate for the distortions. To test the degree of this compensation, participants saw anaglyphic stereoscopic stimuli that showed angles in the horizontal plane, and their perception of the configuration was tested for various orientations and distances. The estimates were compared with the values predicted from the mathematical functions, and participants’ virtual positions were reconstructed via nonlinear regressions. The analyses revealed a moderate compensation for viewing orientations and a systematically overestimation of the viewing distances. These results indicate that people compensate partially for distortions in stereopsis, given that the relevant information is available.

[1]  Margaret A. Hagen,et al.  Where's the Camera? , 1993 .

[2]  M. Ritter,et al.  Effect of disparity and viewing distance on perceived depth , 1977 .

[3]  J. M. Foley.  Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[4]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  A mathematical model for spatial orientation from pictorial perspective displays , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  E. Johnston.  Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[6]  R. Cormack.  Stereoscopic depth perception at far viewing distances , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Patterson,et al.  Factors that Affect Depth Perception in Stereoscopic Displays , 1992, Human factors.

[8]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect measure of perceived distance from oculomotor cues , 1977 .

[9]  W. D. Wright.  Optics Painting and Photography , 1971 .

[10]  R. R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  E. Goldstein,et al.  Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. Holly.  The psychology of perspective and renaissance art , 1989 .

[13]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Exocentric Judgements in Real Environments and Stereoscopic Displays , 1991 .

[14]  S R Ellis,et al.  The Effect of Perspective Geometry on Judged Direction in Spatial Information Instruments , 1986, Human factors.

[15]  Goldstein Eb.  Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle. , 1987 .

[16]  John M. Kennedy,et al.  Optics Painting and Photography , 1970 .

[17]  Hans Wallach,et al.  Some consequences of stereoscopic depth constancy , 1979 .

[18]  M Ritter,et al.  Perception of depth: Processing of simple positional disparity as a function of viewing distance , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Avraham A. Melkman,et al.  Minimizing distortions : seating requirements for stereo projection rooms , 1995 .

[20]  J. Todd,et al.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J T Todd,et al.  Distortions of Three-Dimensional Space in the Perceptual Analysis of Motion and Stereo , 1995, Perception.