The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study, Part 3: Continuous Measurements of Fine Particulate Matter Mass and Composition

Abstract Deployment of continuous analyzers in the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study (SEARCH) network began in 1998 and continues today as new technologies are developed. Measurement of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) mass is performed using a dried, 30 °C tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM). TEOM measurements are complemented by observations of light scattering by nephelometry. Measurements of major constituents include: (1) SO4 2− via reduction to SO2; (2) NH4 + and NO3 − via respective catalytic oxidation and reduction to NO, (3) black carbon (BC) by optical absorption, (4) total carbon by combustion to CO2, and (5) organic carbon by difference between the latter two measurements. Several illustrative examples of continuous data from the SEARCH network are presented. A distinctive composite annual average diurnal pattern is observed for PM2.5 mass, nitrate, and BC, likely indicating the influence of traffic-related emissions, growth, and break up of the boundary layer and formation of ammonium nitrate. Examination of PM2.5 components indicates the need to better understand the continuous composition of the unmeasured “other” category, because it contributes a significant fraction to total mass during periods of high PM2.5 loading. Selected episodes are presented to illustrate applications of SEARCH data. An SO2 conversion rate of 0.2%/hr is derived from an observation of a plume from a coal-fired power plant during early spring, and the importance of local, rural sources of NH3 to the formation of ammonium nitrate in particulate matter (PM) is demonstrated.

[1]  J. Turner,et al.  Real-time Carbon and Sulfate Measurements from the MANE-VU Rural Aerosol Intensive Network (RAIN): Design, Methods and Early Data , 2004 .

[2]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Semicontinuous PM2.5 Sulfate and Nitrate Measurements at an Urban and a Rural Location in New York: PMTACS-NY Summer 2001 and 2002 Campaigns , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  Cliff I. Davidson,et al.  Semi-continuous PM2.5 inorganic composition measurements during the Pittsburgh air quality study , 2004 .

[4]  B. Turpin,et al.  Evaluation of time-resolved PM2.5 data in urban/suburban areas of New Jersey. , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  J. Schauer,et al.  Validation of a semi-continuous instrument for elemental carbon and organic carbon using a thermal-optical method , 2004 .

[6]  R. Klemm,et al.  Daily Mortality and Air Pollution in Atlanta: Two Years of Data from ARIES , 2004, Inhalation toxicology.

[7]  T. Novakov,et al.  The aethalometer — An instrument for the real-time measurement of optical absorption by aerosol particles , 1983 .

[8]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  R. Weber,et al.  Short-Term Temporal Variation in PM2.5 Mass and Chemical Composition during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment, 1999 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[11]  C. Sioutas,et al.  Field Evaluation of the Differential TEOM Monitor for Continuous PM2.5 Mass Concentrations Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[12]  A. Haines.  Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Book review] , 2003 .

[13]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[14]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments , 2004 .

[16]  G. Hidy,et al.  The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: Part 1—Overview , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  Measurement of real-time PM2.5 mass, sulfate, and carbonaceous aerosols at the multiple monitoring sites , 2004 .

[18]  B. Turpin,et al.  Origins of primary and secondary organic aerosol in Atlanta: results of time-resolved measurements during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  D. Dockery,et al.  Increased Particulate Air Pollution and the Triggering of Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Circulation.

[20]  A. Northcross,et al.  Semiempirical model for organic aerosol growth by acid-catalyzed heterogeneous reactions of organic carbonyls. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  W. Wilson,et al.  Semi-Volatile Species in PM2.5: Comparison of Integrated and Continuous Samplers for PM2.5Research or Monitoring , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[22]  D. Eatough,et al.  The measurement of PM2.5, including semi-volatile components, in the EMPACT program: results from the Salt Lake City Study , 2003 .

[23]  S. Warren,et al.  Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate , 1987, Nature.

[24]  Rodney J. Weber,et al.  A Particle-into-Liquid Collector for Rapid Measurement of Aerosol Bulk Chemical Composition , 2001 .

[25]  A. Heber,et al.  Air Quality Measurements at a Laying Hen House : Ammonia Concentrations and Emissions Control # 686 , 2004 .

[26]  B. Turpin,et al.  Evaluation of Time-Resolved PM2.5 Data in Urban/Suburban Areas of New Jersey , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[27]  P. Hopke,et al.  The comparison between thermal-optical transmittance elemental carbon and Aethalometer black carbon measured at multiple monitoring sites , 2004 .

[28]  J. S. Quinn,et al.  Reduction of Particulate Air Pollution Lowers the Risk of Heritable Mutations in Mice , 2004, Science.

[29]  F. Drewnick,et al.  Intercomparison and evaluation of four semi-continuous PM2.5 sulfate instruments , 2003 .

[30]  M. Kleeman,et al.  Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used To Monitor Airborne Particulate Matter , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[31]  W. Wilson,et al.  Semi-volatile species in PM2.5: comparison of integrated and continuous samplers for PM2.5 research or monitoring. , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[32]  P. Solomon,et al.  Semicontinuous aerosol carbon measurements: Comparison of Atlanta Supersite measurements , 2003 .

[33]  Susanne V. Hering,et al.  Method for the Automated Measurement of Fine Particle Nitrate in the Atmosphere , 2000 .

[34]  H. Frumkin,et al.  Ambient Air Pollution and Respiratory Emergency Department Visits , 2005, Epidemiology.

[35]  J. R. Pearson,et al.  Intercomparison of ground‐based NO y measurement techniques , 1998 .

[36]  J. Schauer,et al.  Hourly and Daily Patterns of Particle-Phase Organic and Elemental Carbon Concentrations in the Urban Atmosphere , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[37]  W. Wilson,et al.  Integrated and real-time diffusion denuder sample for PM2.5 , 1999 .

[38]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .