IS Success Model in E-Learning Context Based on Students' Perceptions

1. INTRODUCTION Both undergraduate and graduate courses are experiencing a migration away from the traditional classroom and toward a greater emphasis for electronic delivery of content (Allen and Seaman, 2008). This trend cuts across all departments and schools in the university system but is especially critical in business schools, since the preparation of students for successful business careers will rely on the students' abilities to accurately assess the quality of and rapidly adapt to the changing systems that reflect radical technological advances. The Information Systems Success (ISS) model focuses attention on the information and system quality of specific IT systems. The expanded use of electronic means of course delivery results in different IT systems in which students develop various views of the system quality and information quality that may affect their educational outcomes. In a graduate online information management course, feedback provided in the e-learning environment affected student satisfaction, the typical outcome measure for the ISS model (Rossin, et al., 2008). Feedback, in the context of an e-learning environment, is a measure of the information quality provided by the instructor during course delivery. In addition, the perceived balance of challenge and skill necessary to be successful in the course also affected the satisfaction with the course. The balance of challenge and skill necessary for the online delivery of the e-learning experience is a measure of the system quality. Information quality can also be electronically delivered and assessed by individuals with an information system being absent from the process. In a business environment, the information needs of managers in different functional areas are critical aspects during the evaluation of information and subsequently its quality (Beard and Peterson, 2003). For students, information needs may vary from course to course as well as among various homework assignment styles (e.g. quizzes, short-answer questions, and case studies). The concluding goal of this study ends with a discussion of how an information system can facilitate the delivery of the required information. While the ISS model is used in many instances, a basic assumption of the model is one of voluntary use by the user. This assumption is incorrect in the context of university e-learning courses where usage of the system is required to complete the coursework. Usage of a non-voluntary system is not without its parallels in industry. The implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems for many companies requires the usage of these systems by employees. This industry need has translated these requirements into ERP system courses (Davis and Comeau, 2004). Since the usage of e-learning systems in academic settings is not voluntary, the application and possible changes to the ISS model to an online course environment is a necessary and critical extension of the study of information systems. This study applies the ISS model to study e-learning systems (ELS) in the context of individual impact for a student online environment. The remainder of this article presents the ISS model with its standard constructs. The methodology used to assess the study is reviewed. The data analysis and results are then addressed. Finally, a discussion of the conclusions along with limitations are presented. 2. LITERATURE REVIEW The ISS model (DeLone and McLean, 1992) is among the most influential theories in predicting and explaining system use, user satisfaction, and IS success (Halawi, McCarthy, & Aronson, 2008; Guimaraes, Armstrong, & Jones, 2009). The ISS model can be used to assess ELS success due to the solid theoretical foundation and the numerous, successful empirical studies. The base ISS model consists of six constructs or dimensions: (1) system quality, (2) information quality, (3) systems use, (4) user satisfaction, (5) individual impact and (6) organizational impact. …

[1]  B. Price A First Course in Factor Analysis , 1993 .

[2]  Charles H. Davis,et al.  Enterprise Integration in Business Education: Design and Outcomes of a Capstone ERP-based Undergraduate e-Business Management Course , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[3]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Sean B. Eom,et al.  The Determinants of Students' Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in University Online Education: An Empirical Investigation* , 2006 .

[5]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Graham C. Low,et al.  Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[7]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[8]  T. Grandon Gill Asynchronous Discussion Groups: A Use-Based Taxonomy with Examples , 2006, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[9]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Towards adaptive Web sites: Conceptual framework and case study , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Richard V. McCarthy,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Knowledge Management Systems' Success , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A First Course in Factor Analysis 2nd Ed , 1973 .

[12]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[13]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Important human factors for systems development success: a user focus , 2004 .

[14]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[16]  Jon W. Beard,et al.  Coming to Grips with the Management of Information: A Classroom Exercise , 2003, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[17]  Barbara D. Klein,et al.  The Effects of Flow on Learning Outcomes in an Online Information Management Course , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[18]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[19]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean's Model , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[22]  Ali F. Farhoomand,et al.  A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[23]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[25]  Gerardine L DeSanctis,et al.  An examination of an expectancy theory model of decision support system use , 1982 .

[26]  Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh,et al.  The content and design of web sites: an empirical study , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[27]  Samar I. Swaid,et al.  Measuring the Quality of E-Service: Scale Development and Initial Validation , 2009 .

[28]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1994, ICIS.

[29]  G. Dickson,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems: An Exploratory Investigation , 1982 .

[30]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[31]  Pratyush Bharati,et al.  People and Information Matter: Task Support Satisfaction from the other Side , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction , 1989 .

[33]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Use of Management Information Systems: An Empirical Study , 1981, ICIS.

[34]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Attitudes and Management Information System Use , 1979 .

[35]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Distance education theory , 1991 .

[36]  C. Schewe The Management Information System User: An Exploratory Behavioral Analysis , 1976 .

[37]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  An empirical study of the performance impact of computerization in the retail industry , 1998 .

[38]  Allan Kuchinsky,et al.  Integrating user-perceived quality into Web server design , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[39]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Empirically Testing Some Important Factors for Expert Systems Quality , 2006 .

[40]  Waiman Cheung,et al.  Determinants of the intention to use Internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.