A comparative analysis on how different governance contexts may influence Strategic Environmental Assessment

Abstract This paper explores the relationship between governance contexts and the development and outcomes of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). The main objective of this paper is to understand if, and how, the governance context may influence the system and institutionalisation of SEA, and the capacity of SEA to reach its objectives. The research methodology is based on the comparison of six country-cases that have an established SEA system, including three European countries, two Asian countries and one in Latin American, with distinct national culture and political-administrative setting. Results show that cultural and institutional values impact how SEA is interpreted and carried out, and that SEA systems are facing constraints of a more normative and cognitive nature. Connecting governance contexts and patterns in the SEA systems confirm that SEA is not ‘context free’, but instead ‘context-influenced’, while its capacity is dependent on its level of adaptation to the governance environment.

[1]  Paola Gazzola,et al.  SEA effectiveness criteria—equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy , 2006 .

[2]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  A STRATEGIC ADVOCACY ROLE IN SEA FOR SUSTAINABILITY , 2015 .

[3]  Arend Lijphart.  Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[4]  P. Agamuthu,et al.  Policy trends of strategic environmental assessment in Asia , 2014 .

[5]  E. João,et al.  Sustainability approaches and strategic environmental assessment in small islands: An integrative review , 2014 .

[6]  Tuija Hilding-Rydevik,et al.  Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation , 2007 .

[7]  Daniel Slunge,et al.  Challenges to institutionalizing strategic environmental assessment: The case of Vietnam , 2014 .

[8]  G. Hofstede.  Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context , 2011 .

[9]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making , 2007 .

[10]  P. Hall,et al.  Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms , 1996 .

[11]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[12]  Juan Azcarate,et al.  Beyond impacts : Contextualizing strategic environmental assessment to foster the inclusion of multiple values in strategic planning , 2015 .

[13]  Anne Merrild Hansen,et al.  The Paradox of Strategic Environmental Assessment , 2014 .

[14]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment: Key issues emerging from recent practice , 1996 .

[15]  Olivia Bina,et al.  Context and Systems: Thinking More Broadly About Effectiveness in Strategic Environmental Assessment in China , 2008, Environmental management.

[16]  D. B. Dalal-Clayton,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment: A Sourcebook and Reference Guide to International Experience , 2005 .

[17]  W. Thissen,et al.  Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment , 2000 .

[18]  Robert B. Gibson,et al.  Strengthening Strategic Environmental Assessment in Canada: An Evaluation of Three Basic Options , 2010 .

[19]  A. Ogihara,et al.  Potentialities for a regional public participation framework in Asia: An environmental assessment perspective , 2016 .

[20]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: Principles, approaches and research directions , 2017 .

[21]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Scales and associated data — What is enough for SEA needs? , 2007 .

[22]  P. Driessen,et al.  The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries: towards a better understanding , 2009 .

[23]  Tomás B. Ramos,et al.  Towards effective scoping in strategic environmental assessment , 2015 .

[24]  S. Bulmer.  INSTITUTIONS AND POLICY CHANGE IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES: THE CASE OF MERGER CONTROL1 , 1994 .

[25]  Hens Runhaar,et al.  Putting SEA in context: A discourse perspective on how SEA contributes to decision-making , 2009 .

[26]  Philip Selznick.  Leadership in administration , 1957 .

[27]  M. Pedrono,et al.  An evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Vietnam: The gap between theory and practice , 2011 .

[28]  Daniel Slunge,et al.  GREENING GROWTH THROUGH STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF SECTOR REFORMS , 2012 .

[29]  M. Partidário.  Capacity-Building and SEA , 2005 .

[30]  B. Peters.  Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism , 1999 .

[31]  He Xu,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment performance factors and their interaction: An empirical study in China , 2016 .

[32]  GETTING EA RESEARCH OUT OF THE COMFORT ZONE: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS FROM THE NETHERLANDS , 2015 .

[33]  Donato Di Ludovico,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment, key issues of its effectiveness. The results of the Speedy Project , 2018 .

[34]  Jing Wu,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment implementation in China — Five-year review and prospects , 2011 .

[35]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues , 2010 .

[36]  Xiuzhen Che,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of planning EIA (PEIA) in China: Integrating planning and assessment during the preparation of Shenzhen's Master Urban Plan , 2011 .

[37]  Thomas Fischer,et al.  HAVING AN IMPACT? CONTEXT ELEMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE SEA APPLICATION IN TRANSPORT POLICY, PLAN AND PROGRAMME MAKING ∗ , 2005 .

[38]  Marie Hanusch,et al.  Strategic environmental assessment: the state of the art , 2012 .

[39]  O. Bina.  A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment , 2007 .

[40]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada , 2009 .

[41]  Arwin van Buuren,et al.  Evaluating strategic environmental assessment in The Netherlands: content, process and procedure as indissoluble criteria for effectiveness , 2009 .

[42]  P. Driessen,et al.  Overcoming low EIA performance - A diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries , 2018 .

[43]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Purposes, paradigms and pressure groups: Accountability and sustainability in EU environmental assessment, 1985–2010 , 2012 .

[44]  Maria Rosário Partidário,et al.  Elements of an SEA framework— improving the added-value of SEA , 2000 .

[45]  Ivar Lyhne,et al.  Theorising EIA effectiveness : A contribution based on the Danish system , 2017 .

[46]  He Xu,et al.  AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN CHINA , 2010 .

[47]  Sibout Nooteboom,et al.  The success of SEA in the Dutch planning practice: How formal assessments can contribute to collaborative governance , 2010 .

[48]  Nowarat Coowanitwong,et al.  Importance of context in adoption and progress in application of strategic environmental assessment: Experience of Thailand , 2011 .

[49]  Ernesto Sánchez-Triana,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment for Policies: An Instrument for Good Governance , 2008 .

[50]  Minna Kaljonen,et al.  Views on planning and expectations of SEA: the case of transport planning , 2004 .

[51]  M. Partidário,et al.  Theory versus practice in Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) , 2014 .

[52]  M. Fragkou,et al.  Coal mining on pastureland in Southern Chile; challenging recognition and participation as guarantees for environmental justice , 2017 .

[53]  P. Christensen,et al.  Indicators' role: How do they influence Strategic Environmental Assessment and Sustainable Planning - The Chinese experience. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[54]  L. Meuleman.  Owl meets beehive: how impact assessment and governance relate , 2015 .

[55]  P. Gazzola,et al.  Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment - the significance of learning , 2009 .

[56]  Bo Elling,et al.  The misleading of public participation in environmental assessment – exploring four infrastructure cases in Denmark , 2017 .